Trigger the Bloodshed
Purgation


3.5
great

Review

by Phantom USER (19 Reviews)
January 9th, 2009 | 27 replies


Release Date: 2008 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Summary: Purgation displays Trigger The bloodshed's potential. If they continue to improve on their next album, and add some variation, it is very possible that they will become a force to reckon within the death metal scene.

Trigger The Bloodshed: Purgation


+Lineup at the time of recording:

Charlie Holmes – Vocals
Robert Purnell – Lead Guitar
Martyn Evans – Guitar
Jamie O’Rourke – Bass
Max Blunos - Drums


+Current lineup:

Johnny Burgan – Vocals
Robert Purnell – Lead Guitar
Martyn Evans – Guitar
Dave Purnell – Bass
Max Blunos - Drums




In the days when the current metal scene is repeatedly over-saturating itself with bastardised creations such as 'metalcore' and then 'deathcore', it is refreshing to see that there are still a number of bands who are willing to buck the trend and risk losing popularity by sticking to their roots and relying on sheer musicianship and talent rather than gimmicks or fashions.

Trigger The Bloodshed (TTB) are one such band.

Formed in the UK, TTB are a plain and simple death metal band. They have forged a tight knit playing style honed through endless touring. This is clearly showcased on the album Purgation.

“Purgation” is the band’s debut release, however upon first listen you are attacked by a heavy and relentless assault which bands with a number of albums under their belts would be jealous of. The album starts with the intro track “Inception” which only last for 18 seconds, morphing from an atmospheric fade-in to a walls of guitars and blast beating ending in a growl which flows into the next track. It only really serves as an introduction to the album. However it is reasonably effective and prepares the listener for what is to follow. In fact, what follows is 16 tracks of unrelenting death metal. Whilst the devoted approach to pure death metal is welcome to hear, it does become rather stale by the middle of the album. Not to say that the tracks are weak, all of the tracks are of a high standard, they just follow the same blueprint and more or less blend into one another.

With regards to the instrumentation, all members perform to a high level.

Firstly the guitars:

Tracks such as "Laceration" and "The Abortive Becoming" feature precision riffing by both the guitarists Jamie and Martyn with a large number of tremolo picked riffs and some hard chugging sections. There are also a number of breakdowns, but these mainly serve as breaks in the tracks, rather than focal points around which the songs are built. There are also a number of solos scattered through the album. They are usually rather tasteful and fit the context of the track. They are of standard each metal style, sweep picking, scale runs, tapping etc. Clearly Jamie earns his title as lead guitarist.

As expected with modern death metal the drums are of very good quality. Heavy amounts of blast beats and double bass patterns abound. There are also a number of decent fills which help to keep the tracks fresh and keep the listener on their toes. My one major gripe with this album is the lack of bass. This is not usually very common with death metal albums, and those au fait with predominant bass will be disappointed, however Jamie does a good job of keeping the low end of the rhythm section and matching the guitarists’ riffs, whilst complimenting the drums as well.

The vocals by Charlie are your standard death metal fare. The majority being low end growls and grunts, with some occasional mid to slightly high screaming, however no high pitched vocals (a la the Black Dahlia Murder ) are featured at all. However I did not expect these so was not disappointed. The album also does not contain any “pig squeals” or “brees” another clear sign that the band wants to distance themselves from being lumped into the deathcore scene. The final track on the album “A Perfect Casket” features some female intro vocals but then reverts to Charlie’s standard style. The lyrics cover subjects such as death, politics and love, nothing incredibly groundbreaking, but good enough to work with the instrumentation. Whilst being a solid and competent performance by the vocalist, the lack in vocal variety keeps the whole album from being fully engaging.

There are also two instrumental interludes on the album: “Hollow” and “Domicile”. Both of these tracks are nothing but atmospheric filler, clearly put in to break up the album and possibly to take up some disc time. These work quite well and give the listener some breathing space between each album third. However, be warned, one instrumental track features some pig squeals, literally. The album's production is pretty much clean and crisp, with all instruments and vocals at the same level (a little less so with the bass) and makes the album easy to listen to. Overall, Trigger The Bloodshed have produced a very promising debut which is miles ahead of any recent UK output, and which will fit in perfectly with US acts such as Suffocation (with whom the band have toured). It also shows that TTB have great potential and if they continue to improve on their next album, and possibly vary their style on a few tracks , it is very possible that they will become a force to reckon within the metal scene, and possibly saviours of UK and worldwide death metal .

[+] Pros:
-Good musicianship
-Effective drumming
-Well constructed tracks
-Interesting solos
-Solid Vocals

[-] Cons:
-Album becomes repetitive towards the end
-Lack of audible bass
-Whilst solid, there is a lack of vocal variation

Recommended Tracks:
-Merciless Ignorance
-Laceration
-Lovers
-A Perfect Casket



Recent reviews by this author
Tom Waits Closing TimeNazi Dust Nazi Dust
Black Ships OmensColdworker Rotting Paradise
Assuck Misery IndexThe Black Dahlia Murder Deflorate
user ratings (44)
3.3
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
bastard
January 10th 2009


3432 Comments


review is better than your last few, but try to combine a few of these paragraphs smoothly with maybe some transition sentences or some commas. yada yada yada. otherwise good review. blah blah blah

Phantom
January 10th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Thanks. Does that mean my last few have been bad? or is this just an improvement?

I understand what you mean with the transition sections, I'll try and sort it.



Album is pretty great, if a little too long...

bastard
January 10th 2009


3432 Comments


your last few are sort of mixed imo. This is good content-wise though.

Phantom
January 10th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Fair enough. I'm still finding my feet review wise, so I'm hoping that I'm at least getting a little better with each new one.This Message Edited On 01.09.09

rasputin
January 10th 2009


14967 Comments


Your writing is quite good, but the format of the review is a little annoying. Breaking it up into sections is fine for the time being, at least until you can get your own thing going with your reviews, but try and move away from it and into a more essay like format. Another thing I noticed, which is something I was picked out on when I first started reviewing, is how you often skip to a new line without making a new paragraph, such as this bit:

The lyrics cover subjects such as death, politics and love, nothing incredibly groundbreaking, but good enough to work with the instrumentation.
Overall a competent job by the vocalist
, however the lack in vocal variety keeps the whole album from being fully engaging.

That really hinders the flow of your writing, so just keep it in nice, tidy chunks, broken up only by paragraphs. Otherwise, good job, and it's good to see some of the newer users getting more into writing.

Phantom
January 10th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Again, thanks. I've made some changes to the section you mentioned, let me know if it's an improvement.

I think I have a weird habit of writing short paragraphs because I feel writing large chunks will put readers off.

rasputin
January 10th 2009


14967 Comments


Okay, I think you didn't quite understand me. The review looks a lot more aesthetically pleasing when you have a couple of solid paragraphs rather than lots of little one or two sentence paragraphs. The last four paragraphs before 'Pros' could be joined for example. And with the thing I mentioned before, you have done it in a number of places, such as the paragraph that begins with 'The album starts with the intro track “Inception”' and the paragraph that begins with 'As expected with modern death metal', as well as the paragraph after that. See what I mean? You skip a line mid-paragraph, but you aren't actually making a new paragraph and it makes the review look a little awkward.

Phantom
January 10th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Sorry, it's like 4am here so I'm a little slow.



So what you're saying is that it's more the spacing of the review rather than the content? Because I don't see any other way to go into the "The album starts with" paragraph, so I think it could be pushed up to join with the section before which could be repeated throughout the rest of the review.



Am I correct or just stupidly tired/drunk?

rasputin
January 10th 2009


14967 Comments


Yeah, it's the spacing. For example, you have:

As expected with modern death metal the drums are of very good quality. Heavy amounts of blast beats and double bass patterns abound. There are also a number of decent fills which help to keep the tracks fresh and keep the listener on their toes.
My one major gripe with this album is the lack of bass. This is not usually very common with death metal albums, and those au fait with predominant bass will be disappointed, however Jamie does a good job of keeping the low end of the rhythm section and matching the guitarists’ riffs, whilst complimenting the drums as well.

The line break before 'my one major' shouldn't be there.This Message Edited On 01.09.09

Phantom
January 10th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Ok, I'll give it a edit through now.

DaveBum69
January 10th 2009


699 Comments


Heard these guys a few months back they didn't sound to bad

Essence
January 10th 2009


6694 Comments


Purgaytion

Phantom
January 10th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

;)

hellohelicopter
January 10th 2009


23 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I got this album for free haha. For me its decidedly average. The vocals are fairly poor, guitars have a horrible sound, the songs are largely boring. Does have a few good moments admittedly, but not enough to justify that many songs, they could have halved the number of tracks and it would have been a better album.

Zippermouth
January 10th 2009


1305 Comments


^16 tracks does seem a bit ridiculous to me.

foreverendeared
January 10th 2009


14720 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

most tracks are pretty short though. this just get's old after a while. Even with a lot of one and a half to two minute tracks, it's hard to get all the way through this album. It works better in short bursts.

fix the spacing issues that Rasputin brought up and i'll pos

Phantom
January 10th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

It deifnitely is hard to get through towards the end. A shorter running time would probably make this better.



Oh and are the spacing issues sorted now? Or have I missed some...

foreverendeared
January 10th 2009


14720 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

ahh yes they are fixed now. good stuff

Phantom
January 10th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Thanks. I'm glad the content is good. I just need to work on my layout.

I think it's the transition between word and on here. I'll bear the comments in mind for future reviews though.

foreverendeared
January 10th 2009


14720 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

i'm a bit confused about what happened to the other review of this that was here before. well, this one is better anyways



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy