I give it a 3 on first listen. It's really short.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah but quality over quantity.
Get Nuclear.Sad.Nuclear.
|
| |
I just got this and I'm excited to hear it. Sounds good.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yep, it's good. Surprised me alot. Which next SNS or POYRRG?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
whatever you want, if you want a more refined sound, go with Sad, Nuclear, Sad. If you want their roots and a gritty sounding recording, go with the other.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Which is more Grind?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Their music really isn't grind, it just an assortment of different genres, but I guess you could say Rosy Red Glasses is more 'grind.'
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
It is pretty difficult to classify the band. They have a lot of spazzy moments though.
|
| |
I see them as Grind/Mathcore, just like I see Dillinger as Grind/Mathcore, but I think TN12 focuses more on the Grind aspect and Dillinger the Mathy aspect.
|
| |
Nah I think Number 12's more mathy then DEP. Go with Nuclear.Sad.Nuclear.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
have you even heard Calculating Infinity? There is no such thing as math metal anyway.
|
| |
Of course I have, I own it,and I love Dillinger. But the DEP that is now Vs current Number 12?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
well at least you clarified this time. Still, just because they are playing with varied time-signatures and creative rhythm arrangements doesn't warrent a label under math-metal or whatever. I mean they are both doing their own things, and Dillinger still has their time signature and rhythm manipulation going, just not as noticable as the #12 looks like you. So each is to their own. If anything I would say Dillinger structured better than #12, and that's the reason you can blatently see the #12's quirky-ness as compared to Dillinger's latest work.
|
| |
I do agree that Dillinger is more structured. #12 sometimes feels like a spazzfest.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Should i get some Dillinger if i like #12 alot?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
you could give it a shot. couldn't hurt.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
Dillinger > #12.
Fan of both.
|
| |
Oh, easily.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
Dillinger is fast and technical but it's not as musical as this, if that makes sense. Both are great bands though, can't wait for ire works.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
as a matter of fact i read an interview from dillinger in a guitar magazine talking about how they don't know what they're playing musically, they just try to play what sounds good.
|
| |
|
|
