Album Rating: 4.0

How does this only have 5 pages of discussion? Sput slept on this big time.



6 now lol

Album Rating: 4.5

I certainly haven't. This is album of the year for me unless something really blows my mind.

Album Rating: 4.0

I suppose it being split into two parts made discussion kinda weird. Oh well



@Prophet totally agreed, this will be up there for sure. Though I might like part 1 a tiiiiiiiny bit more.

This is 100% album of the year unless Make Them Suffer's upcoming album is as good as the singles have been the whole way through

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

yea i'll never understand why they split this into two releases

i think the idea when bands do this is that it'll "prolong" discussion or interest in the band/album as if its like parts 1 & 2 of a tv season, but ultimately feel like it backfires pretty much every time.

only time i can ever remember something like that kinda working is when denzel curry released taboo in three parts three fridays in a row. and even that felt so janky

Album Rating: 4.0

I personally appreciate the fact that they split this album up into two parts. a) more exposure/ working with the algorithm is a smart idea, b) their music is so technically dense that to release it all at once would have been overwhelming, c) I feel like the back half has a distinct, heavier feel to it.

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

hard disagree that just over an hour of music for fans of this type of music would be overwhelming. they also originally advertised it as a "double album" when both parts combined are the same exact length as their last album. which then led to my disappointment over the length. had it been two one hour albums or something, I would be more okay with it.