">
 

Future Leaders of the World
LVL IV


2.5
average

Review

by astrel USER (11 Reviews)
July 2nd, 2006 | 24 replies


Release Date: 2004 | Tracklist


Oh my…this band is bad, really, really, bad. I should have noticed by the warning signs.

First of all, they are a Nirvana wanna be band. It isn’t that I absolutely hate Nirvana, but I just don’t want to be exposed more than I really have to. Vary rarely do wanna be band’s work out, because they don’t really bring anything musically to the world, just rehash old concepts.

Secondly, I decided to borrow the album from a friend, so that I could rip it onto my hard-drive. (Jesus, I am such a music stealing bastard) When I asked him if I could borrow it he said sure. So, I ripped the music, not listening to a single song, and planned on giving it to him the next day. Just when I had my hand outstretched with the cd, my friend said, “Yeah, actually you can keep it.” That guy just doesn’t usually go around giving albums away, probably because he is quite the penny pincher.

Thirdly, the name of the album is level 4. Have any of you ever played RPG’s? That is just about the lamest possible level to be at. We all know that it is the buffer level before level 5, where you learn your next cool technique or spell. Being level 4 sucks, just like this album, so, at the very least, the name suits well.

Despite all of the warning signs, I listened to the whole album straight, and boy do I feel like a masochist after that torture.

I think the most adequate way to explain this album would be to separate it according to the instruments. I will start out with what I will always notice first in music, the drumming. It is actually pretty good. The beats are diggable, but the fills seem really uninspired. I would go with saying that the drummer is slightly above average. The songs Everyday and Kill Pop really showcase some talent that is brought down severely by a crappy band.

Next, let’s move on to the bass. Oh wait there is a bass? Actually the bass is pretty prominent throughout the album, it just seems pretty boring to me. It is like I only hear three notes played over and over again on each song.

The guitar, an instrument that can make an infinite amount of different riffs, which I presume the guitarist never learned. The only song that sounds different is Kill Pop. In fact, most songs sound the same because of this goofball, thanks for making the others sound bad…erm…worse.

I saved the best for last. Except by best I mean the absolute worst. These vocals are like a cat on crack scratching a chalkboard. Kurt Cobain’s voice was appreciated because it was unique. It was just how he sounded. Kurt could put emotion into his voice and it was pretty real. The vocals in this album are bad, and are really forced. You can tell the vocalist is trying so hard to have a cool Nirvana voice, but failing miserably. It is just plain intolerable after a full cd listen, and it almost makes me dislike Nirvana for giving them material for them to rip off of.

The musical “experience” as a whole is just downright terrible. Had they ended the cd at about the first 5 tracks and called it an EP, I might have given this a 3 or God-forbid a 3.5. But no, they kept going, extending past all of their creative ideas and just repeat the same songs with different lyrics. Speaking of lyrics, they could have easily been written by a 5 year old. To bring a better metaphor, Blink-182s lyrics seem more mature. Lines like "Your taxes make prisoners of war around the world/They'll mind warp and drug you rape your little girl/Your government loves you so sleep now rest assured" seem like they try to reach RATM's level of a statement against propaganda, but, like the vocals, seem more forced than enjoyable. Most of the songs have something to do with anti-government, love, and love of being anti-government. This album is terrible and should not be listened to, unless you are a band trying to learn what NOT to do as a band, then this album is a great lesson to all.

Recommended Tracks: Everyday, and Kill Pop

Overall: The actual problem with the band is not as much the songs by themselves. The band has developed an okay sound, the songs just mostly all sound the same. The two recommended tracks are highly recommended, as they are quite well done, but the rest of the album seems bland and uninspired.



Recent reviews by this author
The Chemical Brothers Hanna OSTThe Decemberists Castaways and Cutouts
Wesley Willis Greatest HitsFour Tet Rounds
Mindless Self Indulgence Alienating Our AudienceElectric Light Orchestra Time
user ratings (24)
3
good


Comments:Add a Comment 
El_Goodo
July 2nd 2006


1016 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This album isn't nearly as terrible as you say. I like the vocals, sure he's trying to sound like Cobain but he also has a little bit of his own sound in it. And 5 Year olds and Blink-182 writing more mature lyrics? Not true.



There not the best band in the world, or the most original, but this is a solid CD. And this review is totally biased, and you don't explain many reasons why it sucks beyond your own personal opinion.

astrel
July 2nd 2006


2615 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Can't argue with that, I probably did exaggerate my opinion, but isn't by saying that it is a solid CD without any of your own reasons why just as biased as my review? Thanks for the info though, I will try to use a bit less bias in my reviews, if thats at all possible.

slack
July 2nd 2006


249 Comments


The first four paragraphs are unnecessary, and you should back up your comments about the poor lyricism by maybe quoting the lyrics.

For what it's worth I liked the single. I think he has a pretty good voice.

tom79
July 2nd 2006


3937 Comments


I've only heard Let Me Out. It was ok, even if it sounded unoriginal.

Dimes Make Dollars
July 2nd 2006


241 Comments


Judging by your review, this is a horrendous album with no merit, but also an okay album.

Rayne264
July 2nd 2006


64 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

ive listened to most songs, and i liked it. however that was when i had a bad music taste (i think i liked linkin park at the same time). i tried to find some of their songs on my computer, but i guess i deleted them already so i cant really help, but i do remember them being somewhat catchy, but still very unoriginal.

astrel
July 2nd 2006


2615 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Yeah, sorry about it seeming so unclear, its just most of the stuff is not really that good, its ok...that is just listening to one track and then listening to something else. The album together, though, seems like a failure. It feels like they just gave up about halfway through. So yeah some songs are ok, but, overall its a "horrendous album with no merit."

Voodoochild05
July 2nd 2006


34 Comments


I saw these guys opening for Alter Bridge. Man were they horrible. When Myles Kennedy (AB singer) called out the names of the openers, the whole crowd booed.

astrel
July 3rd 2006


2615 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

That is because there is something just unlikeable about this band, but it is hard to point out...like really hot chicks with adams apples...

scpttrerulz
July 3rd 2006


130 Comments


doesn't the name sound a bit pretentious? Like wannabe sellouts .... or is their title supposed to reflect their humour and sarcasm?...

El_Goodo
July 4th 2006


1016 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I saw these guys opening for Alter Bridge. Man were they horrible. When Myles Kennedy (AB singer) called out the names of the openers, the whole crowd booed.




Alter Bridge must have some real stuck-up fans. It's pretty sad that Alter Bridge can headline a concert though, if the members weren't from Creed they'd probably be an opener band.

astrel
July 4th 2006


2615 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

You just might be onto something El_Goodo, I was watching Led Zep covers on YouTube, and there happened to be an Alter Bridge cover of Rock'n'Roll. One person claimed that it was much better than the version performed by Led Zep, and when I said that my opinion differs (especially considering the drumming was nothing to Bonhams) he got all pissy, and sent me a link of a live Zep performance, which just all the more proved how much superior they were. Amazing what being a fanboy does to people. (Even though it might be a tad hypocritical of me to say that, being a Led Zep fanboy, oh well.)

DekWannaBFlea
September 6th 2006


284 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

They were awful opening for Alter bridge. At least Crossfade had a decent live sound. Not saying AB is like the best shit out there but FLW are pretty awful. This Message Edited On 09.05.06

astrel
October 16th 2006


2615 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Okay so AB is slightly overrated by the fans and FLW are absolutely terrible. There, everybody's happy.

minusthebear0
November 22nd 2006


3 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i do not agree with your reveiw at all. I actually like Them dispite what you say.

minusthebear0
November 22nd 2006


3 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i do not agree with your reveiw at all. I actually like Them dispite what you say.

minusthebear0
November 22nd 2006


3 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i do not agree with your reveiw at all. I actually like Them dispite what you say.

AnyColour74
November 22nd 2006


1054 Comments


triple post triple post triple post

helmachelor
June 29th 2007


5 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Not near as bad as you made it sound. Not quite a 5 but a solid 3.5

astrel
June 29th 2007


2615 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I might have been too harsh. Or it could be that the faux-intelligent anti-gov't lyrics covered with boring, repetitive songs that kills it for me. I dislike my writing in this review.This Message Edited On 06.29.07



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy