Shadow Gallery
Digital Ghosts


4.5
superb

Review

by x5spoonman USER (1 Reviews)
November 3rd, 2009 | 23 replies


Release Date: 2009 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Shadow Gallery just keep on improving in every aspect. Simply true progreesive metal.

With the tragic passing of Mike Baker almost a year ago, there were doubts that Shadow Gallery could continue to churn out another fine album without their late vocalist. With new vocalist, Brian Ashland, this doubt can be put aside. I would image Mike would be proud of this record as well as all the fans of this criminally under-appreciated band.

Despite rave reviews of their previous works, Shadow Gallery has never had the recognition they deserve. There are many reasons for this, but the main reason is that their name is simply not put out in the market. This may be a shortcoming of the label they are signed to, but also because they are strictly a studio only band. In any case, the quality of the music they create is all that matters. Despite all the setbacks that fall on them, they continue to sit with the best progressive metal bands out there.

From beginning to end, 'Digital Ghosts' seems to flow from track to track. This isn't a run of the mill cliché concept album, but rather a thematic album. The music, the vocals and lyrics intertwine with each other to create a vivid and haunting atmosphere, whilst also keeping the listener entertained. The album bears the hallmarks of Dream Theater's 'Awake'. Although 'Digital Ghosts' will have less of a massive impact as 'Awake' did on the metal scene, it still challenges the genre into being more accepting to bands that create melodic and dare I say it, 'beautiful' music. Shadow Gallery are intelligent enough to know that being labelled a 'Progressive Metal' band means that they have to rock, but also have the guts to try something different by adding various influences and elements into their craft. There are shades of influences ranging from Metallica to Queen to Pink Floyd. The main songwriters, Gary Wehrkamp, Brendt Allman and Carl Cadden-James are on top form here with their virtuostic technical abilities, but their most important contribution to the album is their restraint. Their ability write great songs without resorting to a speed fest is what separates this band from others.

Praise has to be given to Brian Ashland for not attempting to be a Mike Baker clone. His vocals do not have the warmth of Mike, however the strength of his voice is not lacking in any departments. His voice slightly resembles Geoff Tate of Queensryche, which isn’t a bad thing at all.

Apart from a few technical issues, 'Digital Ghosts' is a resounding success because they manage to do something that most progressive metal bands do not; they progress for the better, not for the worse.


user ratings (112)
3.9
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
Vanwarp
November 4th 2009


86 Comments


I enjoyed Room V immensely, can't wait to get my hands on this one. On another note, this was not a very detailed write up of the new album...wish you would have gone into it a little more!

iwrestledabigmaconce
November 4th 2009


251 Comments


Where did you hear this?


x5spoonman
November 4th 2009


2 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I purposely didn't write too much about the album because this is a 'Review', not a video game walkthrough.

If you want a detailed runthrough of the album, you should listen to it yourself. I just gave my impression of the album, which is usually what a music review is.

Thanks for reading it though.



Btw, I did upload a picture, but it not showing up....

AnEpicDeath
November 15th 2009


313 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

No, you should definitely and always give far more detail. The purpose of the review is to help the reader decide whether or not to purchase the album. Music isn't free; that's why sites like this exist.

HorrorBusiness78
December 29th 2009


118 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Best album of 2009 along with the new Redemption. It's tough to replace Mike Baker, but Brian did a great job.

PJIII
December 29th 2009


4 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

This album receives my best of 09' award.

Yazz_Flute
December 31st 2009


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

They released a new album that quickly after Mike's death? I had no idea.



I'll check this out. Review was decent for what it's worth, but more detail would be nice. You don't have to overdo it like say, my review for Room V but if I didn't already know Shadow Gallery well all I really would have gotten out of this was that the genre is Progressive Metal and their new singer resembles Geoff Tate.



It is well written however.

GnarlyShillelagh
January 10th 2010


6385 Comments


I really dig Shadow Gallery. Definitely gonna check this out.

mansondanzels
January 11th 2010


98 Comments


This was a suprise, I knew they were doing a new album but had no idea it was out. Oh yeah, it's great to boot!

Yazz_Flute
January 11th 2010


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

so I don't remember how to upload album art...

Yazz_Flute
January 11th 2010


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This is impressive, i'll say it's second to Tyranny for now. However, it's pretty much stereotypical prog-metal, so anyone who hates prog-metal will dislike this.



Venom is amazing.

Yazz_Flute
February 22nd 2010


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

*triple post



Bumped to a 4.5, i'm gonna say this is their best album. This is pretty much the perfect progressive metal album. They really kicked it up a notch with this one.

amirali
September 29th 2010


1 Comments


I have most of SG's albums. You're gonna hate me for saying this. But what I always disliked about the band was the singer's voice. No doubt a very capable singer, but not hard enough for a band like this.

I will buy this album based on the reviews and hope the singer is a better fit to the great music of SG.

Can anyone tell me who the new singer sounds like?

McCopper
September 29th 2010


1367 Comments


I am sorry to say this but the singer sucks.
Shadow gallery would be one of my favourite bands if they had someone like Oliva singing (that would sound godlike like most power-progressive metal) but right now I can barely stand them.
I own this record anyway.

AnEpicDeath
October 26th 2010


313 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Brian Ashland is no Mike Baker, and is actually kind of annoying at points on the record. His overall performance is quite good, however, and the guest vocals were excellent throughout. This is very different from their usual stuff, much darker and heavier instrumentally for the most part, but really good stuff.

AnEpicDeath
October 26th 2010


313 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Should definitely look for the bonus tracks btw, especially "Two Shadows", which features Mike's vocals, and in top form at that.

jybt
December 16th 2010


359 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

amirali: The new singer sounds somewhat like a bit of Roy Khan invaded Geoff Tate. Much fuller, lower-pitched voice than Geoff, but otherwise sounds quite similar to Mr. Tate. SG were in fact looking for someone like Geoff, and they succeeded - plus, Brian sings Mike's songs so incredibly well live.



This is a fantastic album that could still have used a tiny bit more diversity and atmosphere.

KILL
September 15th 2011


81580 Comments


not that good

BaturTogay
November 24th 2011


164 Comments


What would you suggest me to listen from them?

KjSwantko
July 15th 2012


12082 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

the production on this sucks dick



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy