Cool.. You're awesome
|
| |
One of my favorite things in life are reading Crysis reviews.
Excellent review as always mang. I've enjoyed their earlier work for sure so its a shame this mammoth release didn't live up to the hype I had for it. Gonna jam this out and see how it is.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Thanks man, glad you liked the review. The album is worth a shot, if only for the third LP.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I dug the all the songs the released from each LP, shame that the first two don't really hold up, but then again that's the risk of releasing a double/triple LP.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
pretty exited about this
|
| |
Great review. I don't have high hopes but I'll still check out of curiosity.
|
| |
Really not 100% I'll check this, even though I kinda want to. Everything else they've done is at least a 3.5 in my opinion, but... 2 and a half hours is a lot. Think I'd have to do it LP by LP and do it that way... though I won't be able to treat it as a singular experience, sadly.
Mint review, as per always ^.^
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
However much they aimed for it, this is not a singular experience. I feel as if all three LP's are quite different and the only one that I think is the sound they were going for is the acoustic one.
|
| |
Roads To the North, Songs From the North
see also: I Know What You Did In the North, While You Were In the North, It Happened One Night In the North
|
| |
It's Hard Out Here For the North
The North Is Too Damn High
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
listening to this now and these soulless clean vocals really are ruining this
the fact they're singing about such negativity and yet sound so sterile and soulless utterly destroys the effect of the album
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.8
Did this leak?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
it did indeed
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
tbh, i'm not sure why they didn't just remove a couple of weaker tracks from album 1, take the best couple of tracks from album 2, merge them and make this a double album. then release the other tracks from album 2 as an ep or something later.
there just aren't enough differences in the songwriting between the first two records to really warrant them being apart. both of them strive for a very similar atmosphere, even if one goes down a far more serene route. but then, regarding album 2, it honestly feels like sometimes they just forgot to add the harsh vocals and electric guitar, like, some moments were begging for it. the first two albums make the third, which is the strongest one, seem kind of out of place like some weird anomaly where if the first two were together with only the strongest material from both it would have showed both sides of their composing style far more faithfully.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
agreed on all counts, as i said earlier "This would be excellent if they combined the funeral doom record with a few songs from the first lp and then used acoustic interludes"
his cleans do have some emotion on some tracks i.e. "Heart of a Cold White Land" but 95% of the time it is lifeless. at least on new moon he had some semblance of emotion to make it engaging.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.8
Jamming the first disc now, sounds pretty standard for them but great just as expected. Stoked to hear what discs 2 and 3 sound like.
|
| |
The first album is pretty good. It has some alt metal vibes and very nice production.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
honestly i think the production is one of the worst parts of this, it's pretty overcompressed and kind of sterile
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
depends what you mean by internet rip
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
our promo was 192kbps so it's not like i had something revolutionary
production sounds average to me, neither exceptional nor bad
|
| |
|
|
