Green Grass For Miles More Than Months
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Futures
September 1st 2016


10961 Comments


if you're going to give criticism don't half ass it

Asdfp277
September 1st 2016


24389 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

album is bad but good for a debut of course

Asdfp277
September 1st 2016


24389 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah, shit like writing a review. And then getting a ghost neg for it.




Your prerogative.

bakkermaarten007
September 1st 2016


5285 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

@radical ed: I don't agree with your criticism because it is so general, so easily to apply to every review in existence. Therefore it's just something like 'I don't like your style'. And if you would have said that, it'd be fair enough. I know sometimes I make things deliberately hard to decipher to make people think- although here I did my best to be approachable- but that doesn't make something bad.

Asdfp277
September 1st 2016


24389 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

"Undecipherable reviews aren't bad" -- bruhhhh



Although this wasn't a hard read tho radical

bakkermaarten007
September 1st 2016


5285 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

You should check this little ep out Futures, it's quite good. You'll dig it

RadicalEd
September 1st 2016


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

How am I being general. "ofcourse" is not a word.



"These tertiary measures take inspiration from bands like American Football or Hammock and thicken the pudding into something that lasts a little longer on the tongue (or ears)."



This metaphor is confused, the pudding comes out of absolutely nowhere and it is not working because you don't listen to pudding and tasting isn't comperable to listening at all and it get's even worse when you realize it and put "(or ears)" in brackets, because then it just make the reader think: Why would I put thick pudding in my ears?



As for the other points, I don't know what to tell you dude, in my view it's pretty self-evident that your wording is very weird and some of your sentences are structured awkwardly. You're free to disagree.



Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
September 1st 2016


26600 Comments


bakker once again proving to be an absolute retard good job

TheGreatQ
September 1st 2016


3003 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I've got to agree with RadicalEd.

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
September 1st 2016


26600 Comments


neg'd

bakkermaarten007
September 1st 2016


5285 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

" "ofcourse" is not a word.

" Ok, will add a space.



"This metaphor is confused, the pudding comes out of absolutely nowhere and it is not working because you don't listen to pudding and tasting isn't comperable to listening at all "



The metaphor is supposed to allude to making the whole 'stronger', more erect... I thought that was obvious and listening & pudding do not need to be related since it's a metaphor. Not an analogy.



"As for the other points, I don't know what to tell you dude, in my view it's pretty self-evident that your wording is very weird and some of your sentences are structured awkwardly. "



I could point you to some acclaimed authors who really write 'weird wording and awkard structures', if you like.



Anyways, will probably need to delete this. The comment section is derailed and I'm getting negs out of nowhere. You're the only one who gave criticism and you didn't even neg.

Asdfp277
September 1st 2016


24389 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I could point you to some acclaimed authors who really write 'weird wording and awkard structures', if you like.




yea but they know what they're doing, + they don't write half-assed reviews as u did, typos and all



bro, i know it goes against ur principles but listen and learn to chill


bakkermaarten007
September 1st 2016


5285 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Going to delete it, those who ghost neg'd: I hope people won't do the same for your reviews. If anyone did as you do this site wouldn't last much longer. You're destroyers, not builders.

RadicalEd
September 1st 2016


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"I could point you to some acclaimed authors who really write 'weird wording and awkard structures', if you like."



wowzers.

bakkermaarten007
September 1st 2016


5285 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"yea but they know what they're doing, + they don't write half-ass reviews as u did, typos and all"



Ugh, if you'd known the stuff I write aside out of sputnik...

Asdfp277
September 1st 2016


24389 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I can't know what you don't show

RadicalEd
September 1st 2016


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Ugh, if you'd known the stuff I write aside out of sputnik...



wowzers [123]



P.S.: I hope it's not in english.



Futures
September 1st 2016


10961 Comments


angry retards itt

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
September 1st 2016


26600 Comments


'Ugh, if you'd known the stuff I write aside out of sputnik...'

link pls

Jots
Emeritus
September 1st 2016


7562 Comments


"decennia" seems like an odd choice when decade would work and roll of the end of the sentence more naturally.

you entire first paragraph has a weird spacing/formatting that is displeasing to look at.

"The point I want to make, is that Green Grass For Miles on his debut EP, tries his own take at this juxtaposed form of making art."
the commas here are strangely placed.

i like your descriptions in the second (full) paragraph

honestly the review is fine. a little bit messy-ish but i kinda like that once in a while.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy