Album Rating: 5.0
joshuatree---was that sarcasm? i assume it was...
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
haha I've been waiting since sunday for this review
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
jerrydavidson---does it live up to your expectations? how so?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
this review was really needed!
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
It pretty much lived up to them. It contradicted a lot of people here, which could be bad for you. But at least you defended what you like.
I do have to say, Many bands have tried to reinvent themselves ( like you were saying in the closing), and it just didn't work. Every now and then it did such as on Ok computer or even Rubber soul for the beatles, but most of the time it probably won't.
|
| |
Sorry, your review was a poor description of a very poor album. Its not because I disagree with your descriptions, its that your descritions were vague. This is probably one of the worst albums Ive ever listened to.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
What a bunch of jackasses. The guy wrote a moderately good review, worthy of one or two negs at most, but because you don't like the album, you neg the crap out of it.
|
| |
I agree, whoever negged this for the wrong reason should be shot. He just needs to clean it up a bit. I could care less if he liked the album, its just the review wasn't really thought out. This Message Edited On 12.05.07
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
What a bunch of jackasses. The guy wrote a moderately good review, worthy of one or two negs at most, but because you don't like the album, you neg the crap out of it. Sure, most everyone doesn't like it. But it got so many negs cause a bunch of people saw it and decided to vote on the review. The review was almost decent, but needed to be way more descriptive.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Album's terrible, dude. I don't see how anyone in their right mind can give this a 3, let alone a 5.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Great review dude, but you kind of ruined it with the last sentenceThis Message Edited On 12.07.07
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
well nice that you stuck to what u think of the album, but there is no way it is a five, a five is an album that is so good that it will be remembered for years, and this just isnt. I think you kinda just love it because it has linkin park's name on it. I'm also interested how old oyu are, cuz if oyur like 10 or 11, i can understand why u might think this album could be thought has a classic.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
oh ya but its no where near hybrid theory.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
The more I think about it, one could possibly call Hybrid Theory classic. But not because of how good it is, and therefore not worth that rating.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
everyone wants to know how old i am so here it is, Altairschaos is 19, almost 20. there it is. happy?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
really? i thought you were already 20
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Michael joined sputnik
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
I don't mean to be entirely rude, altair, but I got the sense you were 15. Turns out you're a year older than me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
no offense taken, ninjuice. scars, what's michaels tag name?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I have no idea? he's supposed to have commented on my paramour sessions review
|
| |
|
|
