Album Rating: 4.0
some of the synth sounds on this are just wonderful
|
| |
This album could have been so much better if his voice wasn't completely unlistenable and grating.
|
| |
yea some of the synths on this are so good
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
you gotta admit it's better than the first though
|
| |
This album could have been so much better if his voice wasn't completely unlistenable and grating.
r u nuts
|
| |
couldnt agree more funeral
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
more importantly what do u guys think of his hair cut. i say 4.1/5
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
this made up for your wolf review
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
golf
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
earl
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
great review man, agree completely
Love Remains ended up being a really influential record, much more than it seemed at the time when it came out
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
yeah HTDW > all tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
yea no doubt
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Both this and Lucidity's reviews are excellent
first quick listen gave the impression of an overextension of blake's mellow vein, but, fuck, just gave it some attention and it's beautiful
|
| |
Nice review, liked the paragraph defending Blake as soul music the best. Had to grit my teeth through the criticism of s/t (trite? in what world), but it's all good.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
ha - i actually wrote that after our discussion!
my issue with S/T was that i felt it was a bit ADD with all of the ideas. solid and i could definitely see the potential, but i couldn't get into it. probably the only 3/5 record i've listened to as much as i have.
|
| |
I think I'm gonna hate this again.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Pitchfork with the pan, surprising.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
BLAKE IS RECKED
|
| |
They spent the whole review mocking his opinions and his sound (they didn't even clearly praise an aspect of the album until the 6th paragraph). Reads more like a 6.0 than an 8.0 review. Lots of artist name-dropping, genre-flaunting and condescension instead of actual analysis. Honestly the most off-the-mark review I've seen them publish in ages.
|
| |
|