Arcade Fire Reflektor
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
RadicalEd
October 25th 2013


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Just listened to the flac version on my good headphones for the first time. And I gotta say, the attention to detail and the whole production work is pretty superb (that bass on "We exist" and "Here comes the Night Time")

RadicalEd
October 25th 2013


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"How many listens/days is appropriate before it's acceptable to write a review?"



Depends heavily on the album and personal preference. Also your review is not inacceptable.

Yuli
Emeritus
October 25th 2013


10767 Comments


Pavel, there isn't a set amount of time it takes to be able to write something good. Like John said, he'll be covering this soon, and because of his style of writing he'll be covering some important points with it. I guess that in a review like this, where you don't focus too much on the fascination behind Arcade Fire-- besides pointing out that it exists-- it'll likely tell me things I'm bound to realize when I spin the album myself.

ti0n
October 25th 2013


1769 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

still jamming this album. wear out factor = zero. for now at least

RadicalEd
October 25th 2013


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Here comes the night time was my least favorite (beside Joan of Arc) but it actually kicks major ass.

ti0n
October 25th 2013


1769 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

true story

they both do tbh



jammin to you already know hard atm

those climaxes on some songs. just too good to be real O.O

Zeneren
October 25th 2013


1088 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

more fond of the live version of night time

Pavelboca
October 25th 2013


83 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Maybe I need to revise my style a bit, but I generally am uninterested by reviews that harp too much on the band's backstory. I thought I gave some of that- but I didn't want to go overboard.



30secondstocydonia
October 25th 2013


417 Comments


This guy is the best user reviewer on this site. Another great review.

RadicalEd
October 25th 2013


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This album is by:

Arcade Fire feat. James Murphy.



James Murphy clearly was more than just a producer on this.

EaglesBecomeVultures
October 25th 2013


5565 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

:/

Pavelboca
October 25th 2013


83 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Where does it say that Radical?

RadicalEd
October 25th 2013


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Nowhere. But his influence is gigantic.



it sounds like LCD Soundsystem with guest verses sometimes. (Supersymtery anyone?)

ti0n
October 25th 2013


1769 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

dont change your style pavel its great. to the point and without those emotional nonsense shit like some others that clearly has nothing to do with the album itself only the personal experience with it. and who can empathize with that anyway

protonjon
October 25th 2013


110 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

RadicalEd they are both tagged as indie rock, with male vocalists and female backing vocalists.

RadicalEd
October 25th 2013


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

^

what are you talking about protonjon. LCD Soundsystem is tagged as electronic / post punk.

clercqie
October 25th 2013


6525 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Flashbulb Eyes is all kinds of awesome.



To add on the discussion of the review content: while it is true that maybe you should have let the album sink in a bit more, I don't necessarily agree with Omaha that a review should provide deeper insight and/or (over)analysis, aka the Pitchfork style. This reviewing style you adopt right now reads very naturally, flows well and it suits you, so don't change it.



My two cents.

ti0n
October 25th 2013


1769 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Ed is right. The pace and everything reminds me much of Sound of Silver. Especially on the 2nd CD.

InfamousGrouse
October 25th 2013


4378 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

dance-punk amirite

RadicalEd
October 25th 2013


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"To add on the discussion of the review content: while it is true that maybe you should have let the album sink in a bit more, I don't necessarily agree with Omaha that a review should provide deeper insight and/or (over)analysis, aka the Pitchfork style. This reviewing style you adopt right now reads very naturally, flows well and it suits you, so don't change it."



Agree. Don't change your style to much. It's nice to have some variety on the site, most regular reviewers are pretty pitchforky, introspective, searching for the deeper meaning, which is fine as well. But variety is good, and stylistically this review flows well. Just let it sink in a bit longer maybe.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy