Album Rating: 4.5
yeah pretty bad comparison
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Thanks slightly. I was going to compare them to PTW but, that wasn't the comparison I was looking for.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Perhaps, but I still think that the vocals are awful
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yet you still consider it 'great', so, ya w/e
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Agree to disagree. Album still rules.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
not if i disagree right lool
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
haha, right.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"yet you still consider it 'great', so, ya w/e"
Yeah because instrumentally it is "great". vocally it is bad, but the instruments make up for it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
But the title track is beautiful.
|
| |
it rules on all fronts
will 4.5 this soon
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Dude, the vocals rip! It's creative for it's time. Listen to anything else that came out around this time. These guys poop all over it.
Nah, Matt's vocals blow. But the music makes them tolerable.
As for saying that these guys poop all over their contemporaries, stop smoking crack.
I looove 7A7P, but like, Converge, Skycamefalling, Botch, Coalesce, Drowningman, Norma Jean, and so many other late '90s/early '00s metalcore bands are on par or better than this.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
I would only take Converge and possibly Botch over this album, and i've heard all of those besides Drowningman.
|
| |
norma jean? better than 7a7p? really mappy?
|
| |
Norma Jean? no fucking way (although I love O God...)
idk the vocals suit the music quite well
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I suppose saying poops all over it's contemporaries is a little harsh. Would you believe throwing a urine soaked napkin at them instead?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I suppose saying poops all over it's contemporaries is a little harsh. Would you believe throwing a urine soaked napkin at them instead?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Especially if I double post?
|
| |
still not correct
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Well, I tried.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
title track is beautiful
|
| |
|
|
