|
i know what's up He does. Really.
| | | Album Rating: 4.5
stop being so stubborn! sure you say different things in each review, but you also repeat a LOT of the same things. listen, we aren't interested in the cases where you did NOT repeat yourself or when you did NOT just describe something as "good" or "bad," we are concerned about the cases in which you DID do these things, which was a LOT. i've read every single one of your reviews. i know what's up
lol. ok, ok, but the unique thing about reviewing this is to look back to what had happened before, and sometimes I end up thinking, man this is dull and pointless. I think there's only so many words in the thersarous that u can use that for. lol.
Don't worry, you're a long way away from taking the 'most hated user' title away from Hyperboleking!
Ha, well that's refreshing.
My advice would be - If you continue all the Queen reviews in this style, so be it. But, if you plan to continue reviewing, take the whole numerical system away from your reviews, try reviewing an album without actually mentioning a song (good practice, it lets you get the idea of how to describe the overall sound of an album, and even if the review is bad, quite a few people will forgive you because you're taking a step away from your usual review format)
Good, good point, hard to do with Queen (there stuff is disjointed) but with Michael Jackson (Off the Wall, Thriller, Bad) definetly possible.
Yeah, I am gonna change the format, this is I suppose the "Queen Format," then there'll be the Michael Jackson Format, what that is? I don't know yet.
and read over your Freddie Mercury review again, and try and identify why that's at least 5000 times better than any of your other ones.
that and i enjoy the album and i felt something.
But it is interesting to review albums you don't like sometimes too.
Anyway whatever people say I'm gonna stick through with the Queen thing. (Just two to go).
| | |
Great. A Michael Jackson format. What's that gonna have...........? Dance moves?
| | | Album Rating: 4.5
Great. A Michael Jackson format. What's that gonna have...........? Dance moves?
A few moonwalks and spins should do the trick.
| | |
no weaner groping?This Message Edited On 10.24.08
| | | Album Rating: 4.5
^ that too.
| | |
I feel like I missed out on something with all this hyperboleking crap...
Of course that had to happen in the span of time after I quit the site a while ago...
| | | Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
This collection is pretty much what Queen is. Classic
| | |
Oh, it was great Brandon. Just great. Oh, there was flaming, and there was anger, angst, IGN, and threats of hacking Mx and many other things. It was all quite eventful, and to be quite honest, laughably pitiful.
No one yet knows if Tribes and Hyperboleking were the same person.
| | | Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Most of their records have up and downs but here you only can find true classics like Bohemian Rhapsody, Another One Bites The Dust, Killer Queen, Crazy Little Thing Called Love, Flash, We Will Rock You, We Are The Champions, Under Pressure, I Want it All, Innuendo, Show Must Go On, You Don't Fool Me,.... The Disc III has a very cool version of Show Must Go On with Elton John.
Queen's Platinum Collection is essential on any decent playlist.
Any rating below 5/5 here is in my opinion completely unfair.
| | |
All is here
| | | Album Rating: 5.0
"The Beatles made ‘great albums’ whilst Queen did not" - Really? Sheer heart attack? A night at the opera, The Works? I could go on, but to state what you have is mental. I would much rather listen to any Queen album than a Beatles album any day.
| | |
"I would much rather listen to any Queen album than a Beatles album any day. "
Totally agree
| | |
Radio Ga Ga and I Want To Break Free are probably my fav songs by this band.
| | |
"These are the days of our Live"
jesus christ lol
| | | |
|
|
