The Faceless Planetary Duality
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
charlesfishowitz
November 12th 2008


1792 Comments


rasputin

iamthenightmare
November 12th 2008


755 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Maybe because the drumming is ridiculously annoying, and consistently so. Even ignoring that, the album doesn't really have any redeeming factors.
You have a very negative view sir. Not understanding the double bass thing, and to say this has absolutely NO redeemable factors to make up for a "bad" double bass sound is too pessimistic to bear. i get this is not your cup of tea but god damn its not an average album.



Sec2ndComing
November 12th 2008


18 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Wow, you guys have some extremely high standards in tech metal, if you don't like the album you must not be very interested in

the genre as a whole, which is understandable. Because its obvious, that "the faceless" is the best thing to happen to the genre

and if you guys don't agree your all in denial.



Of course people are gonna argue and say .."no blah blah blah, btbam are far better and beneath the massacre did this, this, and

that" But at the end of the day, "the faceless" still pummels them all into the dirt plain and simple.



Which bring me to something else, it sickens me when people assume that because a band or artist started a genre they are

automatically the best. There can be a trillion other bands that do it way better but they don't get recognition, its simply arrogant

and stupid. This Message Edited On 11.11.08

marksellsuswallets
November 12th 2008


4884 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

lawl

rasputin
November 12th 2008


14967 Comments


You have a very negative view sir. Not understanding the double bass thing, and to say this has absolutely NO redeemable factors to make up for a "bad" double bass sound is too pessimistic to bear. i get this is not your cup of tea but god damn its not an average album.

Well actually, my view is indifferent and not negative, hence my rating. This is an album that doesn't do a single thing new, is ridiculously overbearing, and does not warrant further listening. I listened to it enough to make a judgment and I have absolutely no intention of listening to it again. Saying it isn't my cup of tea is pretty stupid as well, because you obviously have no idea how much death metal I listen to.

charlesfishowitz
November 12th 2008


1792 Comments


this pummels though

rasputin
November 12th 2008


14967 Comments


pummels my bummels

Sec2ndComing
November 12th 2008


18 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Calling this album average, is simply a cry for attention imo. Also known as "trolling".This Message Edited On 11.11.08

charlesfishowitz
November 12th 2008


1792 Comments


[quote=Sec2ndComing]Wow, you guys have some extremely high standards in tech metal, if you don't like the album you must
not be very interested in
the genre as a whole, which is understandable. Because its obvious, that "the faceless" is the best thing to happen to the genre

and if you guys don't agree your all in denial.

Of course people are gonna argue and say .."no blah blah blah, btbam are far better and beneath the massacre did this, this,
and
that" But at the end of the day, "the faceless" still pummels them all into the dirt plain and simple.

Which bring me to something else, it sickens me when people assume that because a band or artist started a genre they are

automatically the best. There can be a trillion other bands that do it way better but they don't get recognition, its simply
arrogant
and stupid. [/quote]

this. he's rightThis Message Edited On 11.11.08

rasputin
November 12th 2008


14967 Comments


rofl yeah man, i base all my ratings on the amount of attention it brings me, because absolutely nobody could think this album isn't that good!

charlesfishowitz
November 12th 2008


1792 Comments


fuck you sputin go listen to your shitty gay doom

rasputin
November 12th 2008


14967 Comments


People are only 'crazy' from the outside, but from the inside, it's really quite a beautiful thing

charlesfishowitz
November 12th 2008


1792 Comments


clever.

rasputin
November 12th 2008


14967 Comments


i kno rite

Sec2ndComing
November 12th 2008


18 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Uhmm...ok if this is average? what would you consider "above average" tech metal.

rasputin
November 12th 2008


14967 Comments


Gorod

charlesfishowitz
November 12th 2008


1792 Comments


edit: to Sec2ndComing

dont listen to him man...he doesnt know what hes talking about. hes high all the timeThis Message Edited On 11.11.08

rasputin
November 12th 2008


14967 Comments


high on LIFE with JESUS

charlesfishowitz
November 12th 2008


1792 Comments


you fucking liar/blasphemer

marksellsuswallets
November 12th 2008


4884 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This is a pretty ok album but you just really can't compare this with BTBAM...maybe these guys wank more frequently but even though its "technical" metal there's still something to be said for having the ability to show some restraint and still be awesome...



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy