I'll change it. you guys really are right... I was a little hesitant when it was just chan, but since Kirgasm suggested it... I will, next time I get on Sputnik (maybe tomorrow)

idk nothing personal I trust your judgment you're a great writer it's just that you've always been a dick to me so it's kinda hard to take you 100% seriously

crumbling under pressure

Okay he used a questionable term but did that really call for epic menstruation in this thread

but seriously, not trying to start genre wars, my intro is definitely questionable at best, but when did "pop-punk" become a forbidden term?

i think chan just wanted to assert his alpha dog status and basically tried to slap you across the face with his dick by picking up on a triviality

you see i can say this stuff like i see it unlike the other people here who will just agree with everything he says. aaah its nice to be a sputnik outsider

I must acquire this

brylawski give it a fucking rest

aaah its nice to be a sputnik outsider

o noes its the sputnik staff posse

staffattaxx

watch urself!

whole review paints a really pessimistic view of music should probably be taken down

bfff

best fucking friends forever

ew thats gross you guys

3 pages into the thread and there's been no real discussion of the album

refer to chan's plans #2, he explains it better than I did, except I think the general use of the term is necessary, I just don't like
the negative connotation

It's only necessary when the band is strictly pop meets punk. I wouldn't consider this one of those cases.

I'd rewrite the intro, considering all it does is immediately sway readers away from this because it's "pop-punk."

3 pages into the thread and there's been no real discussion of the album

there was been discussion about the review itself which is acceptable

It's like a writing a review for a romantic comedy. You're not going to attract a new audience whatsoever.

this rules