Linkin Park Reanimation
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
MarktheMusicGuy
June 1st 2006


2 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

When I first listened to this album, I thought it was one of the best albums ever made. The more I listen to it - the more I like it. In over a year - its only left my stereo a couple of times!



Those of you who are slating the album - describing it as 'wrong, they should never have remixed great songs', perhaps you should consider listening to the album again - all the way through. The production on this album is flawless, and the way the songs are arranged is both incredible and unique.



It is NOT hybrid theory, but for the most part - it's better. Its more varied, and it certainly flows better. Almost everyone who I have spoken to that actually owns the album - loves it.



As with all albums, there are a few weaker songs, (X-ecutioner style, Hi-voltage) but they fit well in the context of the album.



Do I like this album? YES I ****** DO!! I'm sure if you actually give it a chance you will too.

CharmlessMan
June 1st 2006


169 Comments


A bit of a waste of time this album.

Acey
June 2nd 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

finally, someone who agrees with me.



MarktheMusicGuy

widen your tastes, you think this album is great, there are better IMO, i respect you for that

Acey
June 2nd 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

i think Meteora was better, but that is just me

FM n LP fan1
June 2nd 2006


21 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I love LP but i think this album s*cks i really love Meteora, Live in Texas and Hybrid Theory.....but this one s*cks. Live In Texas is the best album.

Blood9sugarSEX9Magik
June 2nd 2006


31 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I don't like the album that much. I can't stand how they changed the songs. In the end is annoying as hell, and they streched the genre nu-metal into just "white people rapping with guitars in the background." Don't get me wrong, i like rap, but these songs were just plain wrong The songs were fine before, they didn't have to go and remake them.

Hunter555
July 3rd 2006


424 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

AAAAAAAH what does IMO mean? Ive been trying to figure it out like forever! I'm gonna go crazy!

Acey
July 6th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

^ it is In My Opinion Huter555

Hunter555
July 6th 2006


424 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Ya know these guys gave like 8 mil$ to the Tsunami recovery whatever? They might have made this album so they could do stuff like that. (and of course for people like markthemusicguy who like it)

THanks Seetherrocker



DekWannaBFlea
September 5th 2006


284 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

What a pile of dung.

Acey
September 6th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

this or APC's eMotive, but emotive was somewhat decent.

Acey
September 6th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

what CD are you talking about, this or eMotive by APC?

Acey
September 6th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

doesnt matter either way, they just do it to make money, it is the base of our society. example, we like a band, they release another CD. you buy it, it sucks (ex. APC's eMotive). there goes $15 from your wallet to theirs.



just a basic idea for youThis Message Edited On 09.06.06

Acey
September 6th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

stfu, i never said that anyone of these were great or halfway decent, you bastard

Acey
September 6th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

oh, that one. my bad, sorry. i think it is somewhat decent because it is a political album, where as this was just made for money

Acey
September 6th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

what's wrong with making an album for money? breaking benjamin is obviously making their music for money, since they dont put any effort into it




on their last CD. Ben burnley had four different lyrical options for each song, and put their time into it. now you tell me that they dont do this just for money. they put their time into it.



Etienne
September 17th 2006


4 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I still consider this album was released only for money, but it's not as bad as it could have been, and a lot more creative than Hybrid Theory, even if the result is a lot weaker.This Message Edited On 09.17.06

Acey
September 17th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

you have a point, but i still think it was a waste of time and money. Meteora was a good rebound for these guys though after this

Psyclone
September 24th 2006


432 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

The only good remix album from Linkin Park.


Uhh.. isn't this their only remix album? :confused:



Good review. This album pretty much ruined Hybrid Theory, but made it look better at the same time.

mpage2307
April 30th 2007


1 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

This is a great album,

If you liked hyper theory then you'd like this one too. And as far as them just trying to make money, listen to the album and tell me that its not different, the songs have different verses and there are featured artists. Anyone who dosnt like this album isnt a linkin park fan. KRWLING n MY My_Dsmbr are classics. Please listen to the album agian, and if you don't like it listen to hyper theory. I just cant wait for their new album. PEACE.





You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy