got no issue with you personally dude but the review hmm i don't even know where to start
|
| |
"The band had effectively pulled the sheets from under themselves"
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
its a metaphor. a poorly set up one maybe but pretty obvious. maybe "out from under" would make more sense
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
read:metaphor
picture a table with a bunch of glass on it and you pull the sheets out. thats what i was implying
|
| |
"its a metaphor"
you don't say?!
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
the band = the table
the sheet being pulled = we rule the night
the glass = their reputation
better?
|
| |
wat
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
how about you point out the error and save us both some time
|
| |
ins i think you got confused with the idiom of pulling the rug out from under something, which means taking away any help or support
|
| |
jac its a metaphor! don't you get it?? hey ins sorry for being such a stupid ivan. are there any other shitty albums that you're going to review?
|
| |
smoke weed
|
| |
snort blow
|
| |
LOL butts
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
okay i changed it a bit maybe its easier to understand. its supposed to be as if their reputation is synonymous with the band itself, which yes i agree is vague but it made sense to me at the time. i can remove it altogether if its that confusing
thanks for elaborating though jac, honestly. im not sure what tommy and puddles were trying to accomplish aside being purposefully vague and not so subtly trying to start a pissing match
bach: thats likely what caused the problem in the first place
|
| |
Ah
|
| |
i want bjork to pee on me
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
the technique actually is possible keyblade. nice ninjedit tho
|
| |
not lookin for a pissing match i just had some spare time and was reading some staff and contrib reviews for y'know, entertainment
usually i don't comment on em but this one stuck out like a sore thumb
|
| |
If you have 3 arms sure. You haven't changed anything in the review btw :/
|
| |
i want bjork to pee on me
tell me more
|
| |
|