My Chemical Romance Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Angmar
August 22nd 2006


2688 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"I think its brilliant gerards voice has grew so much on this album and the lyrics are all great.the guitar actaves work really well with mcrs sound"



IMO gerards voice is as annoying as hell. But these guys are no acception to many of the terrible Pop Punk bands today. As for the lyrics, they could not be stupider. "Im Not ******* ok!!!" man that pisses me off.



RazorBladeLight
August 22nd 2006


258 Comments


HA HA HA HA HA HA I thought Iluvatar's icon was David Bowie as Ziggy Stardust... I just noticed it's not.
Anyway, I liked the album but it seemed that it was too much contradiction with the words use such as "it's fairly superior to, but less fulfilling than (insert MCR's first album here)." Most of the review was like that so I dunno if you were trying to not bash it too much for the sake of that has been done WAY TOO MUCH before or if you like the album and was trying not to say it was TOO GREAT at once.
As for my opinion on the album-- The first to singles are great but the best song will always be THANK YOU FOR THE VENOM... other than that I have totally forgotten what the rest of the sonsg sound like because like the review stated with full truthiness: it's boring.

AND I DREAMT OF YOU
August 27th 2006


54 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

IMO its an amazing album

i cant choose a favourite track or tracks

shadowstlker
September 10th 2006


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Ok first off, Necrophagist you really are a closed minded person aren't you. If you listened to it and have that opinoin then good for you but if you didn't listen to this album and started dissing them then you need to stop judging things from the cover and what other people think of it and actually listen to the album. Next guitarchick is right on the fact that the song they did at the VMA's did kinda suck so yeah i hope Black Parade is going to be good because if it isn't then i'll just salute them for their artistic expression cause either way i think they're an awsome band.This Message Edited On 09.10.06

shadowstlker
September 10th 2006


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Yeah the song had good lyrics and all i just thought it kinda sounded like Gerard wasn't all there at the time.

labonza01
September 10th 2006


546 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

ok, shadowstlker, any time MCR performs live, it's going to suck, its like 2+2=4, that is how bad their live show is. also, if you like this album, then you will most likely like their next album and any other album after that because it they will all probably sound the same.

shadowstlker
September 10th 2006


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Alright yeah i get your meaning cause most bands that i've seen live did suck. I just think it seems like they really dont want to be there and that could be the reason but thats just my opinion.

EastBayKittie
September 10th 2006


15 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

^yeh it sounded like 'We are the Champions' in the begining.

I thought it was stupid.

shadowstlker
September 10th 2006


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

lol yeah it did kinda sound like that.

jon16
September 16th 2006


19 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

mcr are not good... they're just trying to be emo but the truth is they're not and when they're live, gerard is just saying bad words so that people cannot hear his lame voice...

RottedFlesh
September 16th 2006


213 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Man I'd listen to this album more but theres so many better things to do with an hour of my day. Like...making a good egg-salad sandwhich.

shadowstlker
September 22nd 2006


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Why do you people go dissing bands. I mean if its your opinion then fine but seriously guys, dont go around and diss bands like that just keep your dislike to yourself.

shadowstlker
September 22nd 2006


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

And one more thing MCR is not emo they're more of a pop/punk genere.

Pwntendo
September 22nd 2006


70 Comments


Keep your liking to yourself, then.

XembraceX
September 28th 2006


32 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Wow...I like how extremly biased you people are...



For one...to say that they fashioned their music to appease to the media is a stupid thing to say. And by saying it...you do take sides. This CD isn't any different than their previous efforts. The only real difference is in Gerard's voice.



You my friend are stupid.



XembraceX
September 28th 2006


32 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

And jon16...you are retarded.

TheMisterBungle
September 28th 2006


861 Comments


i think theres more different on this album than his voice.
this bad is really bad IMO

The Jungler
September 28th 2006


4826 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This album isn't one material. Its catchy and (sort of) cool, that and its pretty well written as far as this new Pop-Punk stuff goes. Its not really 2.5 material either, IMO.

XembraceX
September 29th 2006


32 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Oh...for the love of christ. I think the term "pop-punk" is the new emo.





The Jungler
September 29th 2006


4826 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

What the hell are you talking about?



at embrace. not iluvatarThis Message Edited On 09.28.06



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy