Album Rating: 4.5
nah man go for it ben, you never know until you sit down and write something out. i wrote this in about 20 minutes lol, you never know. also i'm sure the people on the sputnik discord server would be more than willing to help/motivate (including me)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
this just goes to show Sput could certainly use to implement some sort of "review but not really" option that's more specific than lists and longer than soundoffs
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
maybe "thoughtpieces" ?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
album is gr8
|
| |
I just get sick of people who use the review space to write papers for their community college English class. It's cute and all, but annoying for people who actually give a toss about album reviews.
I saw the title, saw the band name, saw the reviewer gave it a 5, my reaction was "whoa, this album must be awesome, wonder what he has to say..." and I got half-baked poetry. Between this and people who do "ironic" reviews I'm thinking the site in the process of being taken over by memetic trash.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
not to be rude but you're welcome to find a different music community/review website that takes reviews more seriously. what I like about sput is that ANYONE who makes an account can review which means there are going to HUNDREDS of reviewing styles, some that work and some that don't. whenever I see a more experimental review I'm much more excited to read it rather than a run of the mill review. I agree though the site would benefit from a separate "thinkpiece" submission option but this site has so many other problems to worry about
|
| |
I want you to cut my wrists and black my eyes
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
album is ehh hardcore
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
goddammit zip
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
album is nnnnnnngggg hardcore**
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yay ghost negs
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
this review was just asking for controversy.
also yeah any non-serious comment on here I will now report to the mods for the sake of SomeGuyDude's preferences
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
you're right all hail the king of sputnik SomeGuyDude my review/piece is futile and is worthless in the face of our almighty savior, SomeGuyDude.
|
| |
'yay ghost negs'
I'm sorry, did you think you were going to post a *poetry* review and not get negged?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yeah but i figured there'd at least be comments to back it up lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
www.sputnikmusic.com/review/73884/Bjork-Vespertine/
look no negs
inb4 some1 negs for sake of argument
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
wow those ghost negs are really pouring in now aren't they
|
| |
I don't believe poem reviews per se are what's controversial, it's how they're approached. The principle difference is that SoccerRiot's poem more directly addresses the actual music (in terms of sonic characteristics). I understand that this particular write-up is more focussed on evoking a general theme, and that there is disagreement surrounding whether reviews can be that far removed from an established discussion format.
As for whether sputnik should or shouldn't approve, well, con is right; there are far bigger problems to worry about, and I think it's counterproductive to actively discourage honest artistic efforts. The site as it is may not be capable of accommodating "unconventional" pieces, but I fail to see why we shouldn't be able to make some room for them. Experimental reviews as a whole can be valuable in pushing the boundaries and exploring creative ways to tackle reviewing.
|
| |
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/d1/83/84/d18384daaf386a4865e1c46543130354--the-times-glasses.jpg
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
claire's right though
|
| |
|
|
