Album Rating: 4.5

Jesus this review reads like you listened to it once while playing Modern Warfare

Album Rating: 4.0

I thought the review was good. You may not agree but that doesn't mean it's not well constructed, unless you simply mean it doesn't go into as much depth as you want it to - but that's a common problem when someone else reviews a band you're very passionate about.

Sputnik summed up beautifully

I'm not getting tricked into reading a trebor review (soundoff) again, so I can't say whether that's true or not.

But I know it's not.

this is like her 4th full release tho

thinking the first sentence maybe two sentence has no been proofread dont staff have editors on this site um there has been no editing

review is k

Album Rating: 4.0

Not liking a writing style is not the same as it not being proofread.

not my opinion k am just talking fax and logic bc um checkin my dictionary nd pleasant is not a noun or emotion plz explain why writing style makes it ok to ignore both of these rules

like i can handle 1 but both is much yeh?

"Went a bit harsh"
*Rates a 3

Did you used to work for IGN?

Review looks good to me

Album Rating: 4.0

Pleasant is certainly a category of emotions so if that's your main problem with the review then you went into it looking to nitpick non-problems.

um but i enjoy most of review and dont feel like nitpickin rest of it - so no? pleasant is adjective dictionary says so, cant be used as Nominative like this without article before it. i no see article. why lying? fax and logic

Album Rating: 4.0

Pleasant clearly refers to the word emotion, and if you enjoyed the rest of the review you wouldn't have made such a demonstrative case of pointing out what is at worst questionable wording (but anyone would immediately understand what's being said without an issue).



This happens almost every time a staff member writes a review; someone decides to point out the most asinine issue and tear it to shreds when all that person is doing is voluntarily writing a higher quality review than you could probably write. If there's a legitimate problem then we're all open to constructive criticism, but piling on just to try to troll an individual into submission is super fucking annoying to anyone who's ever put effort into a review here.

but um grammar is wrong??? like mayb can understand without issue but that doesnt make it gd?? i mean my english is trash and u understand me but i write review like this and you give me pos even if u understand? dont think so um

and it annoy me double bc i like the rest of it, review deserving a bteter start tbhonest

Album Rating: 4.0

It’s not even the kind of thing one would literally say aloud, it comes and goes without words.

Soccer Mommy is too talented to settle in the middle, chalk Color Theory up as a sophomore slump, a misstep she’s not likely to repeat, and the most aggressively OK album of 2020.

Album Rating: 4.0

Okay but here's the thing, language barrier or not you're still being a prick:

"dont staff have editors on this site um there has been no editing"

Grammatical errors - real or perceived - can be pointed out in a constructive way like you see in the post directly above this one.

Neek sheesh ya fuckin bully

well at least the thread is more than pleasant

Lmao

Holy shit lmao