Ludwig van Beethoven
Piano Sonata No. 22 in F major, Op. 54


4.5
superb

Review

by Doctuses USER (37 Reviews)
January 5th, 2018 | 17 replies


Release Date: 1804 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Overshadowed yet Brilliant.

In late January 2011, after what must have been an utterly painstaking and fastidious two-week process, the chief music critic for the New York Times, Anthony Tommasini, published an article in which he revealed the top ten classical composers of all time. Admittedly an “absurd” task, Tommasini was drawn to the project as an intriguing mix between the year-end impulse to categorize, think of all the ‘Top ___ of 20__’ lists that swirl around social media around New Year’s, and by a Stuyvestant High School senior curious about why different musical tastes exist.

After J.S. Bach claimed the number one spot, Tommasini hit a wall. How should slots two and three be ordered.. Mozart and Beethoven, or Beethoven and Mozart.. Between the two of them, their outputs in instrumental music rival each other in a quite lovely manner. Yet, Mozart had an unparalleled career as an opera composer. Beethoven on the other hand, whose sole opera, Fidelio, was often ridiculed as tragically dense and quixotic, could never hope to achieve the same clout as a master musical librettist. For all intents and purposes, then, Mozart should obviously claim the higher slot. Yet, Tommasini awarded Beethoven as his number two.

After attending a Harvard Chamber Orchestra concert in the early 1980s, which featured works by the 1950s Neo-Classicist Walter Piston, the late 19th and early 20th century impressionist Claude Debussy, and Herr Ludwig van Beethoven himself, Tommasini was completely awestruck, “the Beethoven sounded like the most radical work in the program by far: unfathomable and amazing.” Thus, Beethoven claimed the no. 2 spot.

I reference all of this in order to lend clarity to Beethoven’s not widely known Sonata No.22 in F Major, Op. 54. Working against its favor is the fact that No. 22 is sandwiched in between the equally titanic, “Waldstein” and “Appassionata”. Only comprised of two movements, both the form and sonorities of No. 22, rival those giants in profundity. Movement one, for example, is not in sonata form, but in ABABA. Not to mention the uplifting sonorities of the A theme, Beethoven composed the first theme as a neatly bookended unit, no frills, no unresolved tension, and no need to look forward. The melody ventures no further from home than the front yard; each of its phrases are of the simplest harmonic progressions, and all end in the tonic.

Quite different in character, theme two looks back towards the days when polyphony plus counterpoint, rather than harmony plus melody, enjoyed preeminence in the music of Europe; theme two is basically a two-line melody underlined almost solely with octaves for emphasis. Yet, the polyphony of Op. 52 yields different results than the polyphony of Bach. Predating the miniatures of Brahms and Chopin by decades, satisfyingly complete, theme two ultimately is a mini character piece. Each line is a series of fast, non-stop, fortissimo, staccato triplets in 3/4. Buoyant and bouncing, theme two is reminiscent of a sinking balloon a child continuously volleyball sets back into the air until it ultimately settles softly back on the ground.

Back home, the repetition of theme A comes off as just that, repetition. Like the theme and variation form of the second movement of the “Appassionata”, aside from some light decoration, we have barely any development typical of sonata form. The same goes for the second iteration of the B theme. The only discernible difference is that now theme B is about one third of the original length. Back to the final iteration of the A theme, we have more florid decoration and some allusions to the buoyancy of the B theme, such as in the syncopation in measure 115, and the triplets that close out the piece from measures 137–149. In those same measures, we get the only drama written into the movement; an ostinato bass in triplets underlies the two beat cubes of the melody which ultimately swells into a shockingly fierce pounding of the diminished chord and then soothingly resolves back to the tonic that satisfyingly closes out the movement.

If the first movement is unique, the second is groundbreaking. Set in sonata form, this movement is unprecedented in two ways. First, is the nature of the movement, it is composed of a single theme. Even the most radical of sonatas were composed of at least two. Second, is the nature of the theme itself. The main line is a literally non-stop 16th note pattern that does not relent for even a single second. The movement begins with a series of F Major arpeggios that climb from left to right hand in four measures, and with each subsequent iteration the melody ascends and descends into the repeat. In the development, using the exact same thematic material, Beethoven introduces a number of increasingly distant modulations that ultimately introduces a syncopated single note motif too small to qualify as a bonafide theme. Further still is the introduction of what might be called the B theme, chromatic descending 8th notes neatly placed at the end of the relentless arpeggios. This material, however, is simply too diminutive to qualify as a theme. We are teased with a recapitulation when theme A returns in the tonic. However, the “B theme” quickly interrupts with a series of relentless modulations. Finally, Beethoven takes us to the coda which incorporates both theme A and the smaller motif working vigorously to a final fortissimo F Major.

Of Op. 54, famed musicologist Donald Tovey characterized Beethoven’s 22nd as childlike, or even-dog like. Tovey writes, “those who best understand children and dogs have the best chance of enjoying an adequate reading of this music; laughing with, but not at its animal spirits; [enjoying] its indefatigable pursuit of its game whether that be its own tail or something more remote and elusive.” Tovey speaks to what struck Tommasini that evening at the Harvard Chamber Orchestra. The nature of Op. 54 is so primal and so instinctive that its music fuses you with your primordial ancestors. There is little else I can think of, even for Beethoven, that possess the power to do the same.



Recent reviews by this author
Robert Schumann Toccata in C major, Op.7Eminem Kamikaze
Fernando Sor Guitar Sonata No. 1 in D Major, Op. 14 Gran SoloLos Angeles Guitar Quartet Pachelbel's 'Loose' Canon
Roland Dyens Tango en SkaïJames Piorkowski Sentient Preludes
user ratings (11)
3.7
great

Comments:Add a Comment 
Doctuses
January 5th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

For some reason the question marks I wrote came out as ".



Also, here is a link to Tommasini's article. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/arts/music/23composers.html?pagewanted=all



And here is a link to Op. 54.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbB6aqHGuKM&t=471s

ianblxdsoe
January 5th 2018


1921 Comments


ok but why

ianblxdsoe
January 5th 2018


1921 Comments


solid review have a pos

Doctuses
January 5th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

why what?

Doctuses
January 5th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

and thanks!

CaliggyJack
January 6th 2018


10185 Comments


holy shit excellent review

Doctuses
January 6th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Thanks!!!

Divaman
January 6th 2018


16120 Comments


Good job. The question mark thing is a glitch in the site. Hopefully one day it will be fixed, but for now, question marks don't come out in reviews (although they show up OK in the review summary -- go figure).

Doctuses
January 6th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

ok cool thanks for the info.

GeorgesKan
February 9th 2018


1 Comments


French musicologist Georges Kan says the two movements might be musical painting of Flight to Varennes and Battle of Valmy. On first publication's cover (A Vienne au Bureau des arts et d’industrie) one can read "LI me SONATE", "LI" in bold as if it was engraved marble. It can't be the 51st Sonata because Beethoven composed 32 sonatas and because never had he indicated the row of his works by instrumentation. ’LI’ is a secret reference to both Louis XVI and Valmy: 10 (X) multiplied by 5 (V) plus 1 (I) equals 51 (LI), while VY interlaced letters could be seen as a crossed out V (an old L version) and an I.

In bars 3 and 7 of first movement at left hand there is an interesting quotation of 6 quavers excerpted from Menuet by André-Joseph Exaudet (F-A-C-A-B-G-F) which were used during French Revolution with lyrics "Imagine, un beau matin" in Parody Sur l’inimitable machine du médecin Guillotin propre à couper les têtes et dite de son nom Guillotine. Pun in french on title In Tempo d'un Menuet tô(t) accounts that the Guillotine is one main topic of this Sonata by Beethoven.

Minuet of 1rst movement describes sadness of Louis XVI (bars 1-24, 69-93, 105 and following) caused by threat of Sans-culottes (thema in octava triplets), then Flight of Varennes (bars 126-136) and imprisonment (bars 137-154) after The storming of the Tuileries.

Allegretto in 2nd movement paints the battlefield from afar (bars 1-36), from aclose (bars 37-44), cavalry charge (bars 45-64), canonnade's roar (bars 65-74), shell whistling (using Doppler effect description - 3 notes chromatism towards bass in bars 36, 64, 126, 129), clamour (bars 115), and final victory (piu Allegro). The two last quavers played staccato might be transcription of guillotine, an evocation of the decapitation of Louis XVI. The same technique will be used later by Hector Berlioz in his Symphonie fantastique (at the end of Fourth Part, March to the Scaffold).

Sforzandi in the first movement's triplets create a Revolutionary theme quoted in retrograde form in Symphony No. 9 (Beethoven) (Finale, bars 822-824, using lyrics was die Mode streng geteilt).

Therefore Georges Kan's proposal for tempi is: 1. In tempo d'un menuetto - 40 Maelzel Metronome for a bar. 2. Allegretto - 60 MM for a bar. Piu Allegro - 80 MM for a bar.

Doctuses
February 9th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Wtf

Koris
Staff Reviewer
February 9th 2018


21957 Comments


lol

Doctuses
February 12th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

I cant tell if this is a joke or not

Koris
Staff Reviewer
February 13th 2018


21957 Comments


Great review btw. As I said in a previous thread, we definitely need more classical reviews on the site

Doctuses
February 13th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

thanks!

hal1ax
February 13th 2018


15777 Comments


you should review some scriabin :]

Doctuses
February 13th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

got any recs?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy