aBp
01.14.10 | help a brutha out. |
Dreamsoffew
01.14.10 | I don't get it. |
Kiran
01.14.10 | to be honest, none of these things matter. objectivity score and rating variance is just how evenly distributed your ratings are and site rank, as far as i can tell, is based on your number of reviews, approval rating, and possibly other things like band edits and news articles. |
Douglas
01.14.10 | Objectivity is based on your album ratings. The more balanced they are the higher it will be.
Site rank is to do with how many reviews/Soundoff's you have written and judged on quality. Though that system is so out off date. |
Dreamsoffew
01.14.10 | Seriously when I looked at list list all that you had written was yo, sorry! |
Powerban
01.14.10 | I think it's good to be in the objectivity score of about 70-85%. It means you actually listen to more good music than bad. People in the 90%'s with a lot of ratings sometimes confuse me since they must listen to a shitload of mediocre albums.
3 = the average score to get you to 100% if you want to know. 3 is a "good" rating. Mines personally at the average rating of 3.5 or something. |
Asiatic667
01.14.10 | Mine was well balanced last time I looked.
I thought it meant how balanced your ratings were, say rating all a certain artists albums between 4 to 5's.
3 is a good album, and welcome to the site |
Douglas
01.14.10 | 81%. Whoop. |
Jim
01.14.10 | 79%
does this mean i win or lose, dougie? |
Jim
01.14.10 | actually it's 78%
i'm drunk or something |
Douglas
01.14.10 | Ha you can win. |
Vooligan
01.14.10 | 71%
i think i win, guys... |
Powerban
01.14.10 | Like I said I personally think 70-85% is good because you're mostly listening to music you like, but you're not some super fanboy. |
Jim
01.14.10 | oh it's like golf
i see |
Powerban
01.14.10 | I'm 76% at the moment. |
Vooligan
01.14.10 | Golf's a shit sport.
But cool beans, anyways.. |
Jim
01.14.10 | cool beans old sport
tally-ho and a bing and a bang and a buzz buzz buzz |
IRAI
01.14.10 | i agree with powerban, i think thats how the objectivity works.
mines @ 54%, but it used to be so much higher.
once you really start to get some ratings to pile up, you soon realize some of the ratings you gave to albums that werent really AS high as they should be amongst the others in that column, and so on.
|
JemsRoker
01.14.10 | I am not clear about most of them. |
bloc
01.14.10 | i'm at 93% objectivity.
i've always wondered about site rank, but i don't think they do it anymore with newer users. first place goes to wither Mikesn or Dethrasher. |
AnotherBrick
01.14.10 | http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=533862
it breaks it all down in there for you |
cirq
01.14.10 | Approval 49%
Site Rank 2024
Album Ratings 118
Objectivity 46%
i suck. |
jagride
01.14.10 | It's pretty meaningless, i don't rate that many albums anyway. Mines at 90% |
Spec
04.22.10 | Sputnik says you actually want your objectivity as high as possible. Not sure what it means or how they get it though haha. |
intothepit83
04.22.10 | keep listening to garbage and you won't have to worry about any of that |
mmfarva
04.22.10 | So if I'm at 57%... that's bad? I'm a fanboy? Damn. I just don't rate music I don't like. |
