">
 

R.E.M.
Monster


3.5
great

Review

by Zebra USER (177 Reviews)
December 4th, 2006 | 6 replies


Release Date: 1994 | Tracklist


When Monster hit the stores is 1994 everybody was shocked. Following the slow, dreary Automatic for the People Monster showcased a completely different side of R.E.M.. The album is probably the bands most controversial release as some die hard fans can’t stand it and others regard it as their favorite R.E.M. album. I’m one of those people that really enjoy Monster,it’s not one of the bands stronger 90's efforts but it sure is one hell of a rock album.

After the first listen Monster is without a doubt the hardest rocking R.E.M. album to date. Instead of playing downbeat folk tunes (Everybody Hurts) or whimsical pop songs (Shiny Happy People) the band decided to take a more hard-rocking and grunge influenced route. At first the loud guitar distortion is difficult to adjust to but after a while you’ll be singing a long with Michael Stipes muffled and uncontrolled voice. Songs such as What’s the Frequency Kenneth? and Star 69 feature the band at its finest as they crank up the distortion and bust out three-chord riffs. A good portion of these tracks are played at a fairly slow tempo, the overall sound is extremely sludgy and sloppy. However Monster isn’t a complete sludgefest as Stipe manages to fit in a couple of subdued and downbeat tracks. Tongue is a very relaxing tune as it features a soft, soothing piano part without any guitar or bass. The strange electronic glitches in I Don’t Sleep, I Dream give the album a bit of variety as the song is a mix of subtle piano chords and western guitar riffs. These two tracks provide the listener with a casual break from the noise and they are also some of the strongest tracks featured on the album.

If Monster has one flaw it’s that the album gets way to repetitive and distortion-heavy. Once you get deeper into the album all of this becomes tedious and you’ll begin wondering why Stipe wouldn’t just turn down the distortion just at little bit. The boisterous riffs of Circus Eny and I Took You In sound like re-hashed b-sides as the band begins to retreat to the same old riffs that started off the album. Another minor downside is the lack of the strong song-writing. This is why many people dislike the album and although I personally think that Monster would have been a more complete album if there were more songs focusing on the lyrics rather than distortion it doesn’t really bother me since Monster is so fun to rock out to.

While Monster may not contain the strong songwriting of Automatic For the People or the upbeat pop tunes featured on Green it’s still a great listen. Monster is often regarded as the bands low point but I strongly disagree. I think that people take the album a bit too seriously, Peter Bucks guitar work may not be revolutionary but it’s fun to listen to a fairly conservative band rock out. If one thing hasn’t changed it’s Michael Stipes voice, you still can’t tell what the hell the guy is shouting in his shrill, lazy, and dreamy voice. I must admit that Monster does have a few dud tracks but in the end the loud, grimy guitar distortion will force you to turn up the volume and rock.



Recent reviews by this author
The Dead C Secret EarthJohn Coltrane Lush Life
Crystal Castles Crystal CastlesUlaan Khol I
Four Tet RingerHarmonia Musik von Harmonia
user ratings (581)
3.5
great
other reviews of this album
putnam39 (3.5)
REM did not make Monster easy – it is difficult to warm to the impersonality of the album’s form...

tribestros (4)
Wait, wasn't Monster released in 1994 and not 1983? Who cares, it's a fresh, upbeat, and heavy trip...

Aeaon (3)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Neoteric
December 4th 2006


3243 Comments


Nice review but do I really need to say that at this point? :p

JohnXDoesn't
December 4th 2006


1395 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

nice review. this is one of their weakest albums...

tom79
December 4th 2006


3936 Comments


Solid review. I need some more R.E.M. and this doesn't seem as bad as some people make it out to be.

The Jungler
December 4th 2006


4826 Comments


What Neoteric said.
I've been listening to more REM as of late, but I don't think I'll like this too much, I think I'm gonna get Reckoning next, that or The IRS Years (whichever's a better deal as I'm sure they IRS has my fav tracks off Reckoning). Great review and stuff.

Two-Headed Boy
December 4th 2006


4527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Don't buy this based on IRS material, it's much mainstream-ier. My recomendation for WB is New Adventures in Hi-Fi.



Great review, very detailed.This Message Edited On 12.04.06

AnyColour74
December 9th 2006


1054 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I forgot how much I love this album. Most underatted REM album imo. A nice review as well.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy