Linkin Park
Minutes to Midnight


2.0
poor

Review

by Gravy USER (3 Reviews)
July 20th, 2007 | 25 replies


Release Date: 2007 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Nice points, but generally incredibly disappointing, mainly because of the hype it recieved. Average at best.

Here's a general summarisation of what I think of this album

On the downside:

> No real creativity
> No real diversity
> No imagination
> Boring riffs that require little talent
> Brad Delson's 'Solos' just prove he's not a particularly good guitarist
> No standout track
> Only 2 properly LP loud tunes, and both of which suck
> AWFUL lyrics

On the plus side

> Less Mike Shinoda 'Rapping'
> A few decent tracks
> Singing quality is very high from Beddington and Shinoda
> There's some swearing :O
.................................................. ...............................


This album is probably the most hotly anticipated album of the last couple of years, even for those who aren't particularly keen on them, as they are just such a big band, and people just take notice of them

For a band that hasn't written any new material for about 5 years, excluding a rather unnecessary mash-up with Jay-Z, 'Collision Course' you would expect there to be a great amount of imaginitive, brilliantly constructed tunes which is the result of 6 very rich musicians having lots of time to record their best work yet.

Er, as it turns out.... No

They have been their own worst enemy, they've hyped-up the album so much that whatever the result, it couldn't live up to the standards. They've spent a lot of the time talking about the sheer amount of imagination that theyve put into the album, citing a drastic change in style with elements of progressive rock rather than the Nu-metal sound that they were famous for. the anticipation was just incredible, with the majority of people incredibly excited about what the outcome could be.
but the more I listen to this bland piece of commercial averageness, the more I wonder how come their fanbase is still so high? Loyalty is the only answer I can come up with, and the lack of willinglness of the linkin park fans to accept the failure of their idols. but ah well.

Almost every point in this album has something wrong with it, and when it comes to music I am normally a very positive guy and like a lot more than i hate within the genre. but this was just SO disappointing. theres an example on the intro 'WAKE', its a good intro with typical LP noises, quiet and relaxing, slowly building up to some guitar riffage, something that would serve as a perfect lead-in to the first proper track, but no, it just stops! WHATS THE POINT!!!!!!

The second track is one of only 2 really loud moments in the entire album. (YES this IS Linkin Park apparently) and starts with a noise that sounds like someone shaking their car keys, and then begins a riff which is unquestionably a blatant rip-off of Points of Authority (another of their songs) only not as good. This again highlights only too well their lack of creativity. The next song is nothing special, a soft emo-like song with cliche lyrics that for some reason young tenage girls will probably like.

The 4th track, BLEED IT OUT has somewhat of a rarity, vocals by Mike Shinoda, the former co-frontman in the verses. It's actually pretty good tbh, one of the rare plus points of the album and something that is a little bit different from other stuff they've done, however it's still lacking that so-called creative edge that the album was supposed to have in abundance according to the guys themselves. Good track though, and Shinoda actually raps rather than talks like a gangster such as many older songs.

The next track is a very emotional and similar to LEAVE OUT ALL THE REST but just much, much better. it actually made me think that the album just had a bit of a bad start on the first listen. the song may make a cliche sound original, but it is very well done so no complaints. This ends with a sound effect that becomes the beginning of the lead single, WHAT I'VE DONE. I personally love this track, and it made me even more disappointed with what the album turned out to be, but hey-ho.

The next track is differnt. it's a Mike Shinoda-lead song which is basically an anti-war hip-hop ballad. the song is very meaningful and the lyrical content is admittedly very good. the lyrics in this are the only good ones on the entire CD, particularly towards the end when the words "With hands held high into a sky so blue, the ocean opens up to swallow you" are sung. nice. although its hard to really rate it as a song.

sadly though, this high-point of 4 good tracks comes to an end, and it's all downhill from here...

the next one is, I think, poor as hell, its the last loud song on the album (one of a whopping 2!!!) but it has a riff that is so simple and common that im sure i wrote it when i was messing about on my keyboard, so to have it featured on the biggest band on the planet's new album was funny, and made you realise that they've really lost their sparkle. The track is called NO MORE SORROW and it has some of the worst, meaningless lyrical content and rubbish riffs. not good. this is followed by Valentine's day, a song that depressive lovestruck 15 year old boys will probably love, and whilst it is typically sung well by beddington, its so commercial and soppy, without having depth, and it sounds far too similar to a couple of their other songs

IN BETWEEN is a proper big waste of time, its basically just Mike Shinoda singing the same pointless gibberish with very little backing music over and over. really unnecessary.
He has a pretty good singing voice though, which makes you wonder why they haven't unleashed his singing ability before. He actually sounds a lot like Dave Grohl I think.

The next song is just same old same old, but not awful

You may remember from reading various interviews that apparently Brad Delson performs solos in the album, and I personally was excited to hear them, as he hasn't before. the result however is poor and basically just demonstrates that he isnt the most talented guitarist in the world, its a simple-finger tapping solo thats done over and over. not the greatest.

the last song is very boring for the most part and features another Delson solo, however not really a very complicated one, the song is of a very slow pace and his solo fits in well with it, but I get the impression the song was at a slow pace BECAUSE his soloing ability is not at the highest standard, but never mind, it doesn't matter. The song ends a disappointing album on a low note.


user ratings (4115)
2.7
average
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
renegadestrings
July 20th 2007


1607 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i think the up/downsides should come towards the conclusion, but it got my attention.

ok review, work on your grammar and be a little more "professional" when you flame the album. i agree with you on most points

also, delson's guitar solos aren't supposed to be those 9-minute long "ride the lightning" solos, they're just adding a little atmosphere... on that note, the one on "in pieces" sucked

Aficionado
July 20th 2007


1027 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Try describing what made those songs so bad rather than just saying "it sucks and its bland". Try making it more cohesive and you might want to add in a conlcusion too.



"sadly though, this high-point of 4 good tracks comes to an end, and it's all downhill from here..."



This is repeated twice in the review, weird.





metallicaman8
July 20th 2007


4677 Comments


Decent enough review and appropriate rating. Linkin Park make ugly music.

Two-Headed Boy
July 20th 2007


4527 Comments


Man, this review was really needed! Kudos!

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
July 20th 2007


4957 Comments


man do I love sarcasm!

AmericnZero02
July 20th 2007


3844 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Don't forget about your Shift key. I don't really see the riff in "Given Up" being a ripoff of "Points of Authority". However I do see a ripoff-esque resemblence between your parenthetical notes and those in Abaddon2005's review.

Gravy
July 20th 2007


16 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

parenthetical as in digressive or as in too many commas and stuff? plus whatever, I didn't even read other reviews and theres no need for the snide comments.This Message Edited On 07.20.07

Gravy
July 20th 2007


16 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

tskThis Message Edited On 07.20.07

kalkal50
July 20th 2007


2386 Comments


I don't get your summary; why is an album disappointing because it gets so much hype?
The grammar could be more proper. Decent review.

kalkal50
July 20th 2007


2386 Comments


it's not a sentence that should be joined by a cause, it doesn't sound right, the album is disappointing because it is bad, not because it gets hype

Bron-Yr-Aur
July 20th 2007


4405 Comments


but see album's can also be classified as disappointing if everyone in the press is masturbating to it prior to its release and it ends up sucking.


kalkal50
July 20th 2007


2386 Comments


oh my bad.. thought when people hyped they masturbated to an album after they've listened to it

Bron-Yr-Aur
July 20th 2007


4405 Comments


i assume your angle is that i said, 'prior to its release'?

in which case, they would've done so after listening to it. respected critics often get advance pressings of albums, to review and provide exposure for.

if this is not what your comment pertains to, then wtf.

Wizard
July 20th 2007


20510 Comments


Another solid review on this album. Ive listened to this multiple times, trying to figure out why these guys are as good as some people say. Horrible at best IMO. This album is also a disgrace to rock in general.

Shattered_Future
July 20th 2007


1629 Comments


Given Up is halfway decent, as well as Bleed It Out and the rap one with just Shinoda. The rest are completely terrible. I just go back and listen to Hybrid Theory whenever I want some Linkin Park.

dub sean
July 21st 2007


1011 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

So do the other '2' rated reviews say the exact same thing as this one or what?



This review was kinda unnecessary, there's already 2 reviews that give it a '2'

descendents1
July 21st 2007


702 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

This album is awful because it's repetitive and cliche, the music contributing to the repetitiveness and the lyrics contributing to the cliche crap I heard. I'm really not a fan of these heavily opinionated angry reviews.This Message Edited On 07.20.07

dub sean
July 21st 2007


1011 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Never even heard the album, but I know it sucks

Gravy
July 26th 2007


16 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

the UK hates linkin park unless you're under 13, except a select few. MTV2s dubbed/ cut little sketch they did was hilarious!!! making it sound like they were speaking the truth. i.e, its rubbish lol. classic.



INGERLAND!!!!!! we will beat Tonga!!This Message Edited On 09.28.07

Andrew128Tou
August 6th 2007


3 Comments


What I've done directly rips off the melody from the movie Halloween, how were they not sued ?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy