">
 

R.E.M.
Up


2.0
poor

Review

by Zebra USER (177 Reviews)
August 10th, 2007 | 7 replies


Release Date: 1998 | Tracklist


R.E.M. sure have come a long way from their original lo-fi, jangle pop roots. Met with mixed reviews when it was first released Up is probably the most controversial R.E.M. album to date. Instead of sticking with their college rock upbringings the trio heavily experimented with their sound and incorporated deep electronics into their music. The ironic shift in sound from New Adventures in Hi-Fi to Up is often compared to Radiohead’s change from alternative rock to deep, mournful electronica with their 2000 release Kid A.

I can only think of two explanations as to why R.E.M. would go for such a cold, keyboard influenced sound. Most importantly drummer Bill Berry shockingly left the band in 1997, one year before the release of Up. Without a drummer while recording Up lead singer/songwriter Michael Stipe relies heavily on drum machines and the occasional use of a session drummer. Secondly R.E.M. ended their nine year relation with co-producer Scott Litt handing over the production duties to Peter Buck and Pat McCarthy. In result Up is an odd clash of sparkly keyboard tones, charming acoustic arrangements and Michael Stipes strange yet emotional vocal delivery.

As controversial as it is I think that Up could have been a great effort but the bottom line is that it just has too many flaws. Tracks such as ”Lotus” and ”Suspicion” feature nice blends of lo-key keyboard notes and simple yet catchy guitar hooks. ”Airportman” is another highlight, a slow, melancholic tune that consists of a scratchy synthesizer tone. The trio is at their best when they craft pop songs with slight electronica influences, and they stick with this formula on about half of the tracks. Unfortunately Mr. Buck had a little too much fun in the studio and it really shows bringing what could have been stand out songs into complete catastrophes. ”Why Not Smile” is a horrid blend of countless bleeps and synths, the same thing can be said for ”Daysleeper” which is an odd combination of staccato piano notes and medieval sounding acoustics. It’s easy to tell that R.E.M. where going for a relaxing, soothing electronica release but Buck and McCarthy just add way too many useless keyboard overtones.

Clocking in at sixty-four minutes Up can be a draggy affair. Despite the flack that it receives R.E.M.’s eleventh studio album isn’t a horrid listen like the bands later work on Around the Sun (I know, that’s not really saying much) it’s just an awkward experimental phase. While there are moments of promise by the eighth track or so Up becomes very hard to sit through just because the music isn’t very captivating or interesting. The melodies are pleasant enough, the synthetic soundscapes are a great addition on a couple of tunes but in the end Up is just way too boring, cluttered, and directionless.



Recent reviews by this author
The Dead C Secret EarthJohn Coltrane Lush Life
Crystal Castles Crystal CastlesUlaan Khol I
Four Tet RingerHarmonia Musik von Harmonia
user ratings (342)
3.1
good
other reviews of this album
theTourist (4.5)
Upside Down and In the Air...

MasterSan (2.5)
Wildly inconsistent and boring....

tjrd (2.5)
...

mcdaid (2)
Not Up on this album....



Comments:Add a Comment 
La Revolucion
August 10th 2007


1060 Comments


Good review in a descriptive sense, but you still don't seem to know where to put commas. The ones that are in there are all in the right place, but many more are needed.

FriendofTheDevil70
August 10th 2007


388 Comments


Nice review. I like REM but judging by your rating I probably won't be checking this out.

Two-Headed Boy
August 12th 2007


4527 Comments


This album is very ehh.

AtavanHalen
August 15th 2007


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I don't think this album is as bad as people say it is. Daysleeper and At My Most Beautiful are two of my all-time favourite songs.

low88
August 18th 2007


11 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Zebra, I agree with almost everything you said, though I could never get into New Adventures in Hi-Fi as most of the people does. Still, it's better than Up, which is one of R.E.M.'s strangest and poorest albums. It's far too long, irregular and it contains some truly awful songs, although I can identify some good tracks as well ("Suspicion", "Sad Professor").



I'm not sure which one of R.E.M.'s albums has been more harshly critisized, any of the three last albums has received bad reviews at first glance, though it seems like with the years, both Up and Reveal are gaining acceptance. I'm not sure if that will happen with the terrible Around the Sun. You made a great review, btw.This Message Edited On 08.18.07

dudeinthepassinglane
August 20th 2007


192 Comments


I'd like to hear the album. R.E.M. with electronic influences sound very interesting - I'm thinking "New Orleans Instrumrental No. 5;" but most of their catalogue after around 1990 would do well with some electronic stuff. I'll think aobut picking this up.

dudeinthepassinglane
August 20th 2007


192 Comments


And speaking of Radiohead's Kid A, did anyone catch Thom Yorke's REM name-drop in Live at the Glastonbury?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy