">
 

The Beatles
Revolver


1.0
awful

Review

by The Human Language USER (3 Reviews)
June 7th, 2008 | 199 replies


Release Date: 1966 | Tracklist


Culture is a rather elusive thing to describe, it is a slippery concept. For some culture is the peak of high arts, intellect and design unique to a civilisation, and unfortunately for some the lowest echelons of society ultimately have more influence for defining it.

In case of the latter four British men spearheaded the origins of popular music and coerced the world into the state of culture it resides in today. Though most certainly not popular opinion it is a true proposition that The Beatles signalled the deterioration of western society through taking the medium of music and simplifying it for mass consumption, producing generations of settle for less people labelling any group who can work fundamental musical theory into a generic work as genius; the deterioration of the term is so that the juvenile lyrics of Kurt Cobain are akin to the prose of Dostoevsky to the naive.

Revolver is a musical insult, a gun which fires blanks. Upon first listen quite some time ago I had a clear recollection of several praises I had read for it in publications active in my mind, which led me to an expectation of genius. The pedestrian arpeggio work and chord strumming of such tracks as I'm Only Sleeping, Here There & Everywhere, Good Day Sunshine, and For No One are met with themes which are simply weak and uncompelling, resulting in quite the disappointment.

The string section of Eleanor Rigby is more appaling then the collective whole of the song. Any classically trained musician would be far from impressed at the simpleton use of such wonderful instruments; a pathetic circumstantial happening mainly for the same reason as the following. Dabbling in Indian Classical music does not work in a pop context, where the musicianship and technical ability of such artists as The Dagar Brothers takes these instruments to an unbridled potential none of this can be captured in a watered down arrangement such as Love You To.

The loud and energetic numbers here feature an ugly aesthetic in the form of She Said She Said, And Your Bird Can Sing and Got To Get You Into My Life. The clean guitars have a distinct ogre-like subtlety in their tone, with some disgustingly hacked out ostinatos masquerading as spice on a musical cake lacking in choice ingredients. Yellow Submarine is stupidity defined; drug-fueled nonsense provides the lyrics whilst plodding musicianship provides the rope to hang itself with. I could criticise until the sun goes down at the poor craftsmanship of any of the remaining songs, but I won't. Featuring a production that has a tendency to hard pan instruments to either speaker I don't believe the sum of the parts on this album are really worth discussing.

Revolver is akin historically to the world of music stumbling on stunted legs, thoughtless musicianship not equating to good songwriting but receiving more then ample praise. The fact that The Beatles shaped the face of music into the commercialisation of watered down compositions based on hacked out melodies and dullard lyrics disgusts me. As far as I am concerned the legs have given way, and the world of music has long since toppled.

Experience Brahms, experience Tchaikovsky, experience Bach. At expense of a lack of bona-fide culture in your life I urge you not to experience The Beatles.


user ratings (4282)
4.5
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Meatplow
June 8th 2008


5523 Comments


lol

Crysis
Emeritus
June 8th 2008


17626 Comments


Here we go again...

Mikesn
Emeritus
June 8th 2008


3707 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

0/10 would not rage againThis Message Edited On 06.07.08

username345
June 8th 2008


594 Comments


I'm not a fan of The Beatles myself, but 1/5? They're hardly the same level of atrocity of Soulja Boy.

foreverendeared
June 8th 2008


14720 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

civilisation


spelling error....

otherwise, besides the completely ridiculous rating, this is quite well written. though i disagree with 85% of what you say.

As far as I am concerned the legs have given way, and the world of music has long since toppled


if you really believe this, i pity you. This Message Edited On 06.07.08

AggravatedYeti
June 8th 2008


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

hehehe...you're a fool.

rotterdog
June 8th 2008


489 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

is this a joke? Or are you just really really really desperate for attention? I'm not a huge beatles fan, but this is just ludicrously off the mark. Don't criticize the Beatles for not sounding like Bach. They weren't trying to.

Ampersand
June 8th 2008


111 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Not really sure what to say about this review. I can't argue the 1/5 seeing as it's your opinion. As I read, it sounded more and more like I was reading a rant from a renaissance artist and not so much a reviewer. Personally, your fourth paragraph bugs me because not all of us are classically trained musicians and many of us like "simpleton" songs. The end of the same paragraph (when talking about the indian classical music), makes it sound like NOBODY can dabble into the realms of indian classical music unless they are at the proficiency level of The Dagar Brothers. I like your writing style, however, and would definitely read more reviews, it just seems like you would pretty much give anything that wasn't flourishing with classical virtuosity a 1/5. This Message Edited On 06.07.08This Message Edited On 06.07.08This Message Edited On 06.07.08

foreverendeared
June 8th 2008


14720 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Ampersand... well said

MrKite
June 8th 2008


5020 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I don't know, you just kind of try and insult the album (nothing really that wrong there with valid reasons) by comparing it to a bunch of names few people could stand up to. You just sound like you're pissed and a pseudo intelligent being.



Your standards seem much too high and it seems like you need to just sit back and enjoy music. I don't care if you don't like this but just loosen up.This Message Edited On 06.07.08

FriendofTheDevil70
June 8th 2008


388 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Its a troll reviewer, no big deal, ban him, etc., etc.



And for the off chance that the review was serious, it should be deleted based on the simple fact that it is utter tripe.

Ampersand
June 8th 2008


111 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

On another note, upon reading your last paragraph it seems you're more in disgust that people listened to this and not so much that The Beatles wrote it.

TheGreatD17
June 8th 2008


1141 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

At expense of a lack of bona-fide culture in your life I urge you not to experience The Beatles.




Duly noted! Thanks for the warning, I shall avoid these up-and-comers at all costs.This Message Edited On 06.07.08

flamethisuser
June 8th 2008


395 Comments


5-5-5-5-1

hummer
June 8th 2008


228 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Thinking music has to be technical to be good is one of the stupidest notions in the world. That, and this is the most brilliant album ever written.

dub sean
June 8th 2008


1011 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Why is this being compared to Bach, Brahms, and Tchaikovsky?

Wildcatforever
June 8th 2008


441 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

I think you need to listen to this again. At first I didn't like it at all; now it is really really good.

JumpTheF**kUp
June 8th 2008


2722 Comments


Good review.

Wildcatforever
June 8th 2008


441 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

I won't neg this, but I don't think you justified giving this album a 1.

ninjuice
June 8th 2008


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Everything in me wants to neg this, although it's pretty well written. Definitely doesn't justify a 1. It's not the best Beatles album, but none of them deserve anything near a 1.

Maybe I will pos it just cause this will likely get negged into oblivion.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy