The Beatles
Revolver


5.0
classic

Review

by ArtHerring USER (2 Reviews)
June 9th, 2008 | 34 replies


Release Date: 1966 | Tracklist

Review Summary: A masterpiece of popular culture, "Revolver" revolutionized Rock and Roll in its musical and lyrical composition - for the better.

“Revolver” revolutionized music. It brought a new level of musical and lyrical sophistication and genius never before seen in rock and roll. It did not “simplify music for mass consumption.” The Beatles and Rock and Roll were and are folk music. This is music of the people that emerged like any other genre in the modern history of mankind. Only technology allowed it to be exposed to such a huge amount of people, and because of this is changed popular music forever. For the better.

What set apart “Revolver” was the analytical depth and musical exploration it featured that had never been seen before in Rock and Roll. In the album, the meaningful and poetic lyrics often only found in the folk movement of that area collided with Rock and Roll, the music of blues and country, here on Revolver immersed with so many other wide genres like never seen before at the time.

To insult the musical quality of revolver is not dissimilar to insulting its roots. This is not to say that they are one in the same, but the music of Revolver is inherently inspired and related to American blues and country, true products of culture before widespread technology and communication. One has the right to not enjoy the album, simply not liking the songs. But when one talks of quality, more often than not one steps into the subject of the music’s roots. No, this is not of the same level of musical “theory” as Bach or Stravinsky or even Philip Glass. That is because this is a different kind of music, the offspring of music with a different kind of history and purpose. There is no way one can compare the two genres on the same “musical battlefield.”

The album begins with “Taxman,” a work of George Harrison, one of the first politically motivated Beatles songs. It has one of those “classic riffs,” perfect in its simplicity, the solo as the song fades out beautiful in its “ogre-like tone.” All of the guitar lines on the album, for that matter, are beautiful in their “ugliness.” In the early days of the Beatles when they played in Hamburg, they were actually known for their high volume, one of the loudest rock groups of the time, despite many youth of today ignoring them as being too “soft.” This clearly resonates on the distortion in Harrison’s guitar lines throughout the album and changed the course of music history. Not everyone is required to enjoy this type of guitar sound and distortion, though I personally find it a beautiful sound. One must, however, respect it as a legitimate musical style with its own history and evolution.

And then there is Eleanor Rigby. “Eleanor Rigby” is famous for that it is not an orthodox rock song, it only being Paul McCartney’s voice and a string section backing him. The strings, arranged by George Martin, were inspired by Bernard Hermann, the great movie composer who wrote the score for such films as Citizen Kane, Psycho, and Fahrenheit 451. Its lyrics dealt with a series of created lonely characters, and it was one of the first popular songs of its kind to seriously deal with a kind of loneliness and depression. Following it is “I’m only sleeping,” a John Lennon trance-like song that was one of the first instances to use a guitar playing backwards, previously used only with vocals on “Rain” (the backside to the “Paperback Writer” single). “Love to you” was the second Beatle song to explore Indian themes, a kind of genre-reaching musical exploration previously unseen in music of the time, “popular” or not. No, it did not feature perhaps the musicianship and technically ability seen in true Indian classical music of Ravi Shankar or Zakir Hussein, to mention a famous few. But it cleared the way for genre exploration unmistakably influential in the history of Rock. In addition, the Beatles, despite what most people think, were actually quite familiar with many concepts and techniques of Indian classical music theory. And you know what? It’s also damn good music too.

“She Said She Said,” and “And Your Bird Can Sing,” two other Lennon songs, feature that same recognizable lead guitar style contained on “Taxman” and throughout the album. The lyrics, though they had still not reached their Lennon potential, are nevertheless sufficiently surreal and poetic. “Here, There, and Everywhere,” is a quiet tune by McCartney, essentially featuring only McCartney's voice, the soft strum of an electric guitar, and the occasional soft beat from Ringo in the background. “Yellow Submarine,” contrary to popular belief, was not “drug-fueled,” but inspired by children’s drawings, like “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds” (Sgt. Pepper), another song with false rumors of drug influence. “Good Day Sunshine” was Paul McCartney’s tribute to the Lovin’ Spoonful’s “Daydream.” Though simplistic on first glance, its arrangement is actually quite daring.

“For No One,” a poignant, softer tune by McCartney, is known for its unique French horn solo. “Doctor Robert,” a song that was actually drug-inspired, contained references that ironically went largely unnoticed. It has that familiar guitar line style, even featuring a brief interlude of only vocals and a harmonium, as they sing “Well, well, well, you’re feeling fine / Well, well, well, he’ll make you.” “I Want To Tell You,” another Harrison song, is another daring arrangement. As Harrison sings, “When you're here / All those words, they seem to slip away,” a piano in the background accompanies Harrison, playing a note and then a note a half-step down (F to E), and, amazingly it fits. This song also had heavy Indian influence, though less obvious with the absence of any Indian instruments.

“Got to Get You into My Life” is a McCartney song backed by a horn section and a constant tambourine, consciously influenced by the Motown sound. The only guitar in the song comes in half way through it to deliver a classic solo. The final song on the album, “Tomorrow Never Knows” was perhaps the most experimental of the Beatles songs to that point. The entire song is backed by a constant sound bite of some seagulls, various other background noises and riffs, and an unchanging drum loop. Lennon’s voice was fed through a Leslie speaker, a type which was usually used only for rock organs. The entire musical experience of the song almost single-handedly ushered in the psychedelic movement.

This is a masterpiece of popular culture. Learn to deal with it.


user ratings (4282)
4.5
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Mendigo
June 10th 2008


2299 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

so I guess this is The Human Language's alter ego?

interesting exercise, exactly as well written, but it's as wrong as the 1 star review.

HighandDriving
June 10th 2008


3288 Comments


Lol a counter review, awesome.

The Human Language
June 10th 2008


21 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I did not fathom my discourse on Revolver resulting in such a jumbled and flawed criticism.

ArtHerring
June 10th 2008


31 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Ha! Yeah, it's really flawed, so jumbled and flawed you didn't even have to say how or why! I did not fathom your logic would be so excellent.This Message Edited On 06.09.08

Erratic
June 10th 2008


1120 Comments


oh god here we go

kattunlover69
June 10th 2008


1194 Comments


guys guys ...read my review...not this..u know what...@#$@ u artherring !@#$ u

thatguy84
June 10th 2008


214 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Cause this album totally needed another 5 review. It also seems like you're just rebutting to the 1 review rather than making any productive comments. This pretty much could've gone in a post responding to it with all the extra bits taken out.



Aside from that, "Here, There, and Everywhere" is a Paul song.

lateoctober
June 10th 2008


171 Comments


someone please pass the popcorn

Mendigo
June 10th 2008


2299 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

“Yellow Submarine,” contrary to popular belief, was not “drug-fueled,” but inspired by children’s drawings, like “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds” (Sgt. Pepper), another song with false rumors of drug influence.


lol... yeah, of course, children's drawings... ;)

ArtHerring
June 10th 2008


31 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

thatguy84, so what if there's another review? Were you the one who wasted half an hour writing it? People, I just felt like writing a review, plus respectfully rebutting some of the claims of "The Human Language". Chill. It's ALRIGHT. Nobody's going to get hurt.



Mendigo, is about.com reliable enough for you?

"Written by Paul one night in the summer of 1966 while lying in bed and thinking of making a children's song."

http://oldies.about.com/od/thebeatlessongs/a/yellowsubmarine.htm

I could get more sources if you want.This Message Edited On 06.10.08

Mendigo
June 10th 2008


2299 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

can about.com know something like that?

I mean, it's impossible to believe that a band with all members taking some kind of drugs recording a song like Yellow Submarine with such obvious lyrics didn't mean it that way. I know they claim that the only drug song they've ever recorded was Tomorrow Never Knows, but I guess they just made fun of their fans. After all they always were extremely humorous.

robin
June 10th 2008


4596 Comments


i like the way this has suddenly got two reviews in two days like it's just been released or something.

SHOOTME
June 10th 2008


2393 Comments


This owns the negative review.

foreverendeared
June 10th 2008


14720 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

oh god, yeah

Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds isn't inspired by drugs at allThis Message Edited On 06.10.08

SylentEcho
June 10th 2008


1606 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

No, it wasnt...Lennon himself said that his son Sean showed him a drawing when he was in pre school of his friend Lucy he said, "this is my friend Lucy in the sky.....with diamonds". Thats how they got the name.

SHOOTME
June 10th 2008


2393 Comments


George owns Lennon and McCartney imo.

ArtHerring
June 10th 2008


31 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

George is still underrated, but nevertheless, I don't think he's quite as good as Paul - I think Lennon was miles ahead both of them. Yeah, George was "only" the 3rd best songwriter in England!

SHOOTME
June 10th 2008


2393 Comments


Ringo is, obviously, the very worse.

foreverendeared
June 10th 2008


14720 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

No, it wasnt...Lennon himself said that his son Sean showed him a drawing when he was in pre school of his friend Lucy he said, "this is my friend Lucy in the sky.....with diamonds". Thats how they got the name.


please find me some reliable source that confirms this. i'm actually really interested.

ArtHerring
June 10th 2008


31 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

That's pretty widely known. Here, AUSTRALIAN News!

"in 1967, when Julian came home from school with a drawing of a girl surrounded by stars. John asked him what it was. “It’s Lucy, in the sky with diamonds,” Julian said."

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21831399-2703,00.html



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy