">
 

Opeth
Watershed


3.5
great

Review

by testicularcancer USER (2 Reviews)
August 21st, 2008 | 21 replies


Release Date: 2008 | Tracklist


“Watershed” is a terrible name for an album. Listeners will almost immediately expect either some sort of radical departure from the artists’ catalogue or a full re-imagining of their sound, so even if the album is enjoyable it may be viewed as a disappointment simply because expectations were skewed. It is then much more difficult to critique an album such as Opeth’s “Watershed,” the band’s ninth studio album in 13 years, if only because what the listener expects and what the listener perceives are two completely different reactions.

Opeth’s core sound, dark progressive death metal interspersed with sections of soft acoustic beauty, mystique, and bluesy guitar work, has remained relatively unchanged over the band’s tenure. In recent years, however, lead compositional mastermind Mikael Akerfeldt has indulged his interest in 70’s progressive rock, yet this has resulted in the band’s trademark experimental, heavy sound becoming somewhat diluted and softened, especially on 2005’s “Ghost Reveries.”

There is certainly nothing wrong with a metal band playing softer music; in fact, Opeth are undoubtedly the masters of juxtaposing heavy and light playing, weaving a tapestry of monumental, brutal, and beautiful sounds together into ten-minute masterworks. It is discerning, however, to hear a band so clearly adept at playing heavily fall into the pitfall of grasping for mainstream exposure. By all means, Opeth should have a rather large fan base, especially in the underground metal community, but by streamlining their material somewhat, they risk alienating their old fans.

2008’s “Watershed,” then, may prove to be a rather important album in the band’s discography, if for no other reason than it shows Opeth playing music for themselves and indulging in their own interests as opposed to appeasing old-school listeners. The first track, the beautiful “Coil,” is a prime example of this. Mikael’s opening vocal melody is unabashedly singable and catchy, and doesn’t quite sound like anything else the band has written. Unfortunately, the pristine atmosphere of the first minute or so is marred by an incompetent female vocalist, who takes over the second half of the song yet can’t quite sing with the same power as Akerfeldt.

“Heir Apparent” is the obvious centerpiece of the album; immediately brutal, rocking, and heavy, it exhibits everything great about the classic Opeth sound without, somewhat unfortunately, any particularly resonating guitar or vocal licks. Regardless, the driving force of Mikael’s booming growls is a real treat for long time fans who may have been put off by the relatively soft quality of “Ghost Reveries.” The outro is pure, classic Opeth and a real treat for any metalhead.

With “The Lotus Eater,” Opeth explore new sonic territory, and the results are a mixed bag. This song is all about atmosphere, yet at times the melody and structure of the piece suffer at the hands of this technique. Additionally, the inclusion of a Dream Theater-esque keyboard groove, completely out of place in the song, was an incredibly poor decision by the band. Opeth have always maintained an air of subtlety and intrigue that Dream Theater haven’t been able to match in a decade, yet this little slip into prog-metal wankery is extremely disquieting. Regardless, some of the album’s best vocal melodies are hidden within, and Akerfeldt’s ability to switch between growls and clean vocals is admirable (though I still suspect the two vocal lines were recorded separately).

And then there’s “Burden,” which sounds like Opeth’s attempt at a Kansas tribute tune. The opening vocal melody is actually rather original; in fact, Akerfeldt’s clean vocals have never quite sounded better than on this record, and even when the melodies miss, his incredibly clean and powerful delivery is able to work wonders. Unfortunately, “Burden” presents a problem that has persisted in Opeth’s discography for the last half-decade: overlong, “soft” songs containing no climax or hint of metal. Opeth are at their best when they bridge the gap between progressive metal, death metal, and progressive rock, so removing two of these elements severely dampers their appeal.

This doesn’t mean that “Burden” isn’t enjoyable; it is in fact a rather listenable and darkly interesting tune. One does wish, however, that the progressive style had been implemented in conjunction with the band’s heavier side, not against it (and the inclusion of a dreadful Hammond organ solo does not help). The severely out-of-tune acoustic guitar outro, no doubt recorded purposefully, is actually physically painful to listen to.

“Porcelain Heart” is the single from the album, which is odd considering the tune lasts for eight minutes and contains no discernible chorus, save for a droll “Ah-Ah-Ah” theme repeated ad nausea. The transitions between light and dark are particularly effective here, yet the complete absence of Akerfeldt’s growls dampers the impact. A few exciting drum fills, courtesy of new studio drummer Martin Axenrot, are powerful and technical despite sounding slightly out of place, though he proves a worthy successor to previous percussionist Martin Lopez.

“Hessian Peel” is the other heavy-hitter of the disc, and at nearly twelve minutes it contains almost everything one would expect from a typical Opeth epic. Compositionally the song is all over the place, with the various sections fighting to flow together smoothly and nearly succeeding. Despite its choppy nature, the song maintains a powerful drive and purpose throughout, which is more than can be said for the previous two (shorter) tracks.

The closer, “Hex Omega,” is the oddest track on the album. After an unassuming metal riff, the song devolves into what sounds like modern-day Porcupine Tree, particularly the vocals and ambience of the verses. Porcupine Tree frontman Steven Wilson and Akerfeldt are renown friends, and countless times before the two have either collaborated or borrowed ideas from one another (Wilson produced Opeth’s classic album “Blackwater Park” in 2001), yet never before has either band’s influence been so readily portrayed. The song’s boring harmonic movement threatens to ruin the vibe, but the sense of dark atmosphere that pervades the composition pulls the listener in, ending the album on a strong, if anticlimactic, note.

So, is “Watershed” a bad album? Hardly. When Opeth rock out and bring the metal, the results are staggering and among the strongest music currently in the scene, while the more wayward, experimental nature of some of the tracks, particularly “The Lotus Eaters” and “Hex Omega,” is only minimally detrimental to the album. Technically speaking, Akerfeldt and company still have some awesome chops, yet many of the songs lack that one defining hook to make them truly classic tracks among Opeth’s 13-year oeuvre. Fortunately, every track seems to age extremely well with repeated listening, as the slightly stripped down nature of the riffs and composition appear to make more sense.

All of which almost makes “Watershed” live up to its name; while the music contained within can hardly be seen as a drastic departure save for a few radical inclusions here and there, fan reaction is almost certainly going to be more divided than ever before. The keyboards have been thankfully toned down quite a bit since “Ghost Reveries,” yet the introduction of two new members, guitarist Fredrik Akesson and Axenrot, has still left many fans in unwarranted disarray.

While the record may never be held in the same regard as such as classics as 1999’s “Still Life” and 1997’s “My Arms, Your Hearse,” “Watershed” will almost certainly be remembered as one of the most thoroughly original and difficult records of Opeth’s discography. What it lacks in melody, resonance, and structure, it almost makes up for with daring, experimentation, and intrigue, not to mention the band’s trademark dark and beautiful atmosphere. Any open-minded music fan will find plenty to enjoy, while longtime Opeth fans would do well to listen with open ears and an open mind.


user ratings (4207)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
SHOOTME
August 21st 2008


2393 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

nevemind about that, good review sunny boy.This Message Edited On 08.21.08

botb
August 21st 2008


17935 Comments


attention new reviewers, there don't need to be any more watershed reviews. that is all.

Cuban Pete
August 21st 2008


3813 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

are you fucking kidding

fireaboveicebelow
August 21st 2008


6835 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

we could probably use more cattle decapitation reviews that I'm sure you'd do

Willie
Moderator
August 21st 2008


20214 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

“Watershed” is a terrible name for an album.
Why?
Listeners will almost immediately expect either some sort of radical departure from the artists’ catalogue or a full re-imagining of their sound
Why?
if only because what the listener expects and what the listener perceives are two completely different reactions.
What?
It is discerning, however, to hear a band so clearly adept at playing heavily fall into the pitfall of grasping for mainstream exposure.
I think you believe that "discerning" means something other then what it really does. Also, not growling and not being heavy through an entire song does not equal "grasping for mainstream exposure". ... I can't read any more.



SHOOTME
August 21st 2008


2393 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

hey everybody



quit being such douche bags about albums with such and such amount reviews getting reviewed again, people get to review what they want and it should be fine.

bustyagunz
August 21st 2008


911 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yea this isnt the greatest review, your just making a bunch of completely false assumptions and backing them up with a pretty good vocabulary, and then its a track by track of an album that has 25092350 reviews......

ninjuice
August 21st 2008


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Willie made some great points.

It is rather annoying seeing reviews for this though.

BallsToTheWall
August 21st 2008


51260 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Nevermind, i'll justwrite one for my new metalreview.com account.This Message Edited On 08.21.08

Hawks
August 21st 2008


88861 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Everyone should be banned from reviewing this album from now on.

McP3000
August 21st 2008


4121 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

no



thats a bad idea. This album hasnt even gotten a rating under a 2.5 yet

Hawks
August 21st 2008


88861 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

What does that have to do with stopping people from reviewing it?

botb
August 21st 2008


17935 Comments


sarcasm is a wonderful thing

Willie
Moderator
August 21st 2008


20214 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I didn't say shit about how many other better reviews are already posted for this album. I was just curious about specific things he said, that's all. I don't think he thought this through.

freudianslipknot
August 21st 2008


803 Comments


Just read this review at RYM on this page:
http://rateyourmusic.com/collection/deadwing12/reviews,ss.r
by Deadwing12

And also here:
http://clubs.wcsu.edu/echo/a%20and%20e.htm

by Thomas Jacob
Arts and Entertainment Editor

Also your Dragonforce review is at RYM here:
http://rateyourmusic.com/collection/Jaxijin/reviews
by Jaxijin

I am not insinuating anything, but are you actually all three of these people?

testicularcancer
August 21st 2008


4 Comments


I start a new account on every website I go to.

freudianslipknot
August 21st 2008


803 Comments


OK

Willie
Moderator
August 21st 2008


20214 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

So, what you'd like us to believe is that you are Thomas Jacob, the Arts and Entertainment Editor at Western Connecticut State University?

Essence
August 22nd 2008


6694 Comments


You have a fondness for stringing three adjectives together when one is sufficient, even if they are not synonyms.This Message Edited On 08.21.08

SCREAM!
August 22nd 2008


15755 Comments


can we get a mod to delete some of these Watershed reviews? Only half of them are worth more than two shits anywayThis Message Edited On 08.22.08



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy