| |
|
|
Review Summary: The Beatles' great musical encyclopedia. The double album that wrote the book on double albums. Double albums have always been an anomaly for me. I can never look at them the way I would look at single albums, and I can never listen to them the same way, either. It’s difficult to understand exactly why a second piece of vinyl can so radically change my perception of a work of music. What is the difference? Tangibly, there isn’t one. Strictly speaking, music should not be affected by the amount of other music surrounding it. But when an artist goes out on a limb and decides to record a double album, something changes.
I’m going to say that this difference is that, for me, a double album isn’t a collection of songs in the conventional sense. It is an artistic statement, a musical destination to travel to. The songs themselves become less important than the overall picture. The best double albums are the ones that demand to be played through cover-to-cover. During a great double album, the listener does not want to skip a single track because weak as the track may be, it is a vital part of the experience of the album and without it, something would be missing. Albums like this take some getting used to; they often take a long time and many listens to properly understand and appreciate. However, once one has broken that barrier, the double album offers a rich, deep listening experience like no other. Successfully creating such an album is a very difficult task suited for only the most adventurous and talented bands.
So then what better band to record a timeless double album then the Beatles, arguably the most adventurous and talented band the world has ever known? None, of course. Of every double album I have heard, none has been quite as marvelous as the White Album in terms of overall effect. As such, I don’t think I have ever heard an album that took me as long to get into as this one. And it was immensely rewarding. In my mind I place this masterpiece on a pedestal where it sits alone, unlike any other piece of music ever recorded.
The story behind the album is famous. In 1968, the Summer of Love was over and the “hippie” movement was coming to a close. As such, The Beatles wanted to strip down from the trippy, psychedelic excesses of their 1967 albums, concentrating on simpler, worldlier music. However, the band was in a fractured state of turmoil at the time and they fought constantly during the album’s creation. In both songwriting and recording, there was very little collaboration between the band's members on The White Album, but each member was at the absolute peak of his powers. This gives the album an initially disjointed feel, but in time the tracks start to form an overall picture.
The White Album is well-known to be staggeringly, immensely diverse. It can be viewed as a literal encyclopedia of musical styles and genres. And, as the cliché goes, the Beatles had the talent and creativity to master every one of them. Piano pop, hard rock, psychedelia, folk, heavy metal, show tunes, doo-wop, country, classical, blues, avant-garde sound collages, Disney-style lullabies? You name it; it’s here. While I may not be a fan of all of these styles, they all contribute greatly to the experience, and even from a purely technical standpoint, the album contains no poorly-written or poorly executed songs bar maybe a few experimental tracks. With thirty songs total, that amounts to a massive amount of well-crafted music, and I wouldn’t change a note of it. The highlights? Even selecting highlights betrays the nature of the work, but if I was forced to choose, I would say that the moments of the album that I enjoy the most are the exquisite acoustic ballads throughout such as "Julia" and "Mother Nature's Son," as well as the brilliant, multipart “Happiness Is a Warm Gun.”
So, what exactly is this “overall effect” I keep mentioning? It's not easy to describe. The White Album, when taken in two discs as prescribed, is a journey through time and space, to all sorts of styles of music throughout the world. After you’ve gone through the whole thing, track for track, experiencing all the styles and lyrical stories, you really get the feeling that you’ve witnessed something monumental. The experience is truly spectacular, and it never gets tiresome. I have listened to this album many, many times, and I plan on listening to it much, much more in the future. It is a transcendent musical journey that anyone can enjoy, regardless of tastes and genre preferences.
other reviews of this album |
|
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Ah shoot, I didn't leave double spaces between the paragraphs. For some reason now the indentations are all gone.
| | | Go to your profile and you can edit the review.
| | | Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Ah, okay, thanks. Now it doesn't look like a mindless wall of text.
| | | I've always thought this album was overrated a tad, but that's probably just me and few others.
nice review, especially if it is your very first.
| | | this is probably the worst thing the beatles did during the last 8 albums of their career
| | | Let It Be
| | | I find my self dividing this album up depending on my mood. I'll either listen to all the acoustic(ish) tracks or all the more electric material.
| | | Let It Be isn't long as shit, and it also has the best beatles track ever...Let It Be on there
| | | Album Rating: 3.0
this is probably the only worthwhile thing the beatles did during the last 8 albums of their career yep
| | | I could have sworn the best Beatles track was A Day In the Life but whatevs
| | | I believe I am one shy of having all official Beatles albums and can say I absolutely love all of their work. This album is great, although atleast for me I find it near impossible to rank Beatles albums. They all offer different things, but I truly find them all to be exceptional!
| | | Album Rating: 4.0
this is probably the only worthwhile thing the beatles did during the last 8 albums of their career
extremely epic fail sir.
Piano pop, hard rock, psychedelia, folk, heavy metal, show tunes
I might be COMPLETELY wrong, but I'm pretty darn sure "real" heavy metal had never been played before. Deep Purple, Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath would all be among the first.
The review is okay, but it would be nice to add more about the music. I realize that's a bit hard to do when there's so many songs and styles here, but you could try. 2 out of the 6 paragraphs describe/analyze the music, and I don't think that should be the case in a review.
| | | Album Rating: 4.5
^^ I think he means Heavy Metal by using Helter Skelter as an example. It aint "heavy" per se, but its the hardest track they ever laid to tape though, and its fitting that the song is on the White. And yes, Sabbath were the first to play the Devil's Note.
And might I add you have my vote for your review being well-written!
| | | Album Rating: 5.0
good review for one of the greatest albums of all time, and the best double album ever recorded.
what makes this so amazing is that the songs everyone labels as "filler" still are so fucking amazing, had any of them been recorded by almost any other band it would be their everlasting magnum opus. I mean, just take for example "Martha My Dear", a song no-one ever mentions when talking about this album; listen to it closely and then tell me it's not a fucking masterpiece.
| | | Album Rating: 5.0
Good review!
| | | Now that would be a conversation (the best Beatles track).
| | | Album Rating: 4.0
Good review. And for the best Beatles track, thats debatable. I Will, Blackbird, Dear Prudence?
| | | Album Rating: 5.0
While My Guitar Gently Weeps, Blackbird, Happiness is a Warm Gun, Sexy Sadie, I'm so Tired, Glass Onion? ;)
| | | Album Rating: 4.0
I think Happiness is a Warm Gun is easily the best song on this.
| | | Good review. I think this album, like pretty much every other Beatles album, is great.
| | |
|
| |