Cannibal Corpse
Evisceration Plague


2.5
average

Review

by Ahrimanic Trance USER (2 Reviews)
March 22nd, 2009 | 33 replies


Release Date: 2009 | Tracklist

Review Summary: a bunch of good ideas executed in a boring/Cannibal Corpse way.

So with my first listen of Evisceration Plague, I thought for a second that Cannibal Corpse had improved over their career and had finally made the awesome death metal that they had the potential to make, proven on inconsistent but great albums like The Bleeding and Tomb of the Mutilated. After that first listen, however, I remembered one thing, that Alex Webster is a gore-obsessed nut and who soully gives everything his fans want, that gory, slimy, and grimy death metal that they are highly known for. So yes, Evisceration is a slight improvement over the inconsistency of other Cannibal Corpse releases, but it’s only an improvement in that sense. As a whole, it is much more consistent, but it’s more consistent in the fact that’s its also as brutal as it is generic.

Essentially, this is Kill 2.0, with Cannibal Corpse moving into a more technical range. The riffs have a certain frenzied motion to them, and for some tracks, it works. “Scalding Hail” can be noted for its short length and its grind influence in the fact that it punches everything into a single burst. “To Decompose” as well, features this sort of combustible factor, but even more so, with Cannibal Corpse experimenting with a Necrophagist-like arpeggiation. “Evidence in the Furnace” is possibly the fastest track of these, entire starting o with some System of A Down-like riffing and moving into a more de-tuned Slayer sound. However, Cannibal Corpse doesn’t just experiment with quicker, grindier sounds here; Alex Webster instead has also added a hint of metals from all over. The title track maybe one of the few cases of a death metal ballad, and if not that, then it moves in a more doom-like pattern to the music. It’s still heavily Cannibal Corpse, and while the riffs are much slooooooooooooower, they still have a purely CC feel, but its just something completely new for Cannibal Corpse.

However, despite all this experimentation, what went on to make this boring still? Well, while the ideas are all excellent, they aren’t exactly superbly carried out. It feels like Cannibal Corpse went through their book of influences and just made songs spread out and diverse just for the sake of it and it sounds as boring as all hell. Yeah sure, the look-at-us-we-can-do-what-Necrophagist-do-to tracks are fun to listen to, but damn it does it get tiring after a while. With multiple listens you realize this just another Cannibal Corpse album with layers of ‘experimentation’ to make it spicier and fresher. It’s an entertaining listen every once and a while, but don’t expect anything more than that.

Evisceration Plague, again, is a great first listen and its mediocre after that. It’s somewhat ambitious, and that’s only if taking every influence you can while still remaining the same boring band is ambition. It is one of Cannibal Corpse’s better albums, for sure, but it’s still incredibly tiring to listen to and lacks any originality. No doubt, it will keep CC fans incredibly happy, but for people who want something aspiring in death metal, well, you’re retarded if you went to CANNIBAL CORPSE for that. Alex Webster doesn’t give a fuck about you anyways.


user ratings (919)
3.5
great
other reviews of this album
Trey STAFF (4)
Cannibal Corpse can no longer be the poster children for everything that is wrong with death metal....

My Name Is Mud (4)
And you thought 'KILL' was brutal.......

godiseverywhere (4)
While it's not the greatest they've put out, this record still has "Quality Death Metal" written all...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

approval needzorz



also woah flaggedThis Message Edited On 03.21.09

KILL
March 22nd 2009


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

neged

bastard
March 22nd 2009


3432 Comments


pretty good review

Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

thanks for the comments folks

Willie
Moderator
March 22nd 2009


20214 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

I realized one thing, that Alex Webster is a gore-obsessed nut and doesn’t give a flying fuck what his listeners think, just as long as Cannibal Corpse continues to make that gory, slimy, and yucky death metal that they are always highly known for.
The irony is that there's an album called "Gore Obsessed"... so I'm thinking that the fact that he is, in fact, gore obsessed shouldn't have ever been a surprise or something that had to be "realized". Second, if you were to poll the average CC fan I'm sure that'd tell you that what they want is for the band to continue to make "yucky" death metal, so it seems that Alex does care about what his fans want, just not what you want.



It's a good first review... advice for a second, spelling and grammar checks.







This Message Edited On 03.21.09

Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

good point

Rugter32
March 22nd 2009


754 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Good for a first.

Needless to say, I completely disagree about the rating. Best Cannibal Corpse album IMO, they show that they're insanely skilled. I hate Barnes era Cannibal Corpse, and Corpsegrinder era went from "eh" to "****ing awesome". Carnivorous Swarm owns.

Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

they've had better albums, but this is easily some of their better stuff.

Hawks
March 22nd 2009


89021 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I still think The Bleeding is their best.

Anthracks
March 22nd 2009


8045 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

vile and tomb are my favs

Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

amen brotha



vile sucks, but tomb and the bleeding are awesome.This Message Edited On 03.21.09

Willie
Moderator
March 22nd 2009


20214 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

Reviewer Said:I thought for a second that Cannibal Corpse had improved over their career and had finally made the awesome death metal that they had the potential to make.
But then he said:vile sucks, but tomb and the bleeding are awesome.


Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

grrrrrr willie lol



but i also mentioned their inconsistentcy

This Message Edited On 03.21.09

Willie
Moderator
March 22nd 2009


20214 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

Well, why would you think they "finally made" the awesome death metal album if you already think they've made two awesome albums already... more contradictions

So yes, Evisceration is a slight improvement over the inconsistency of other Cannibal Corpse releases
The inconsistency of other albums such as tomb and bleeding cause they're... inconsistently awesome... but Evisteration is an improvement on that then; right?

Hawks
March 22nd 2009


89021 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

You're just tearing this guy to shreads Willie lol.

Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i mean that's my first impression.



god i feel dumb, i might just re-write the first paragraph.

Willie
Moderator
March 22nd 2009


20214 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

I'm not trying to. I'm trying to find out whether it's his review that's bullshit or that comment where he suddenly thinks two of their albums are "awesome".

Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i totally rushed the review, i wrote it in like 5 minutes. Particularly the first paragraph.

Willie
Moderator
March 22nd 2009


20214 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

naughty, naughty...

Ahrimanic Trance
March 22nd 2009


62 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

indeed



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy