Adam Lambert
For Your Entertainment


2.0
poor

Review

by dylantheairplane USER (70 Reviews)
January 5th, 2010 | 15 replies


Release Date: 2009 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Good voice, bad production....

American Idol is a show that sets out across the country every year to find an alleged “American Idol,” or in other words, a phenomenal singer that can rake in some decent cash. In 2009, the easy-going acoustic rock singer Kris Allen unexpectedly beat out Adam Lambert on the show. Lambert, who essentially is the direct opposite of Allen, used his flamboyant glam looks and singing ability to dominate the show, because surprisingly enough, Lambert can sing really well, probably better than Allen can. After coming in second on the show, the rock band Queen tried to get Lambert as their front man. Yes, the band Queen wanted Adam Lambert to be Freddy Mercury’s replacement, but for good reason. Even before this offer, the public had been comparing Lambert to Mercury because of his dramatic and enormous vocal range. The biggest mistake of his life was that he turned them down. Lambert decided that before joining a band, he wanted to go solo first. This solo departure resulted in For Your Entertainment, an album that combined pop, rock, and dance elements into each of its songs; basically equaling out to exactly what fans were expecting. For Your Entertainment is a no surprise attempt for Lambert to expand from beyond what people saw on the show, with this in mind he tried to put on a hard edgy image to draw in appeal. This image was easy to see as a sham, but the public bought into it anyway.

It’s probably better that Adam did not win the competition because if For Your Entertainment is what Americans idolize, then America is ***ed.

For Your Entertainment is basically everything that’s wrong with the music industry these days as it is a decent singer literally taken over and manipulated by his recording company, through over-produced and auto-tuned vocals, to horrendous song writing. Both of these factors stand out on the title-track “For Your Entertainment.” This lead single starts and finishes with the exact same loud thundering beat from start to finish that is just layers over layers of effects that over-power all the vocals by a long shot. The vocals too consist of multiple layers of high and low pitches, while one layer is singing in a normal range, the other is screaming in an unnaturally high pitch. The lyrics themselves are nothing to be proud of, “So hot/Out the box/Can we pick up the pace?/Turn it up/Heat it up/I need to be entertained.” The song is just a mess of sounds that is more confusing than entertaining…what a misleading song name! The song that had preceded it in context of the album degrades “For Your Entertainment” even more; “Music Again” is easily the most standout and most authentic song of the album. The song is simply a straightforward rock song that makes use of Lamberts excellent singing range. The guitars are not anything extraordinary but are atmospherically entertaining to the songs tone.

Another problem with the album is the big names that were attached to writing for the album. That may sound like an odd statement, but it is undeniably true, just by listening to a song on the album you can guess who wrote it because it makes Lambert sound like he is doing a cover of their work, not his own solo album that For Your Entertainment barely is. This is most notable on, “Whataya Want From Me,” written by Pink, a pop singer full of angst, an image that Lambert tried to but on for the song. Compared to the previous single, “Whataya Want From Me” is a musical improvement, but its sounds too much like Lambert trying to be Pink, rather than taking what she wrote and making it original. Falling to this same curse is “Fever” a song written by recent pop-princess Lady Gaga. “Fever” is lyrically the best song on the album, (“Oh baby, lights on/But your mom’s not home/I’m sick of laying down alone/With this fever – fever, yeah”), but again, sounds like a flimsy cover of a Lady Gaga song rather than a strong Adam Lambert song. It did not help that Lady Gaga had her own version of the song circulating around the internet for the past year. Anyone who has heard the two different versions can pick out Gaga’s own rendition as the clear superior. Despite some of the horrendous things on this album, it is very marketable and will sell many copies around the world, it would not come as any surprise if Lambert becomes very successful in the pop world. For Your Entertainment is the true definition of sellable pop music, but that does not make it good by any means.


He should have gone with Queen….



Recent reviews by this author
Kelis FoodBjork Vulnicura
Sharon Jones and the Dap-Kings Dap Dippin'Blondie Panic of Girls
Bjork TelegramCher Closer to the Truth
user ratings (120)
2.9
good
other reviews of this album
Blindsided (2.5)
Say hello to the male version of Lady Gaga....

caiocoletti (3)
He's got the voice... but "For Your Entertainment" is more the work of a well-connected production t...



Comments:Add a Comment 
dylantheairplane
January 5th 2010


2181 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I tried to have some fun with this review, my rating and comments about the album are serious, but I tried to add some humor.

Fuff24
January 5th 2010


1120 Comments


Good review.The worst song here is Soaked, which is radiohead lite taken to a new level.

dylantheairplane
January 5th 2010


2181 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

A neg with no reasoning....fuck heads

ov420
January 6th 2010


300 Comments


shouldn't you be flying or something u airplane

dylantheairplane
January 6th 2010


2181 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Oh sorry I will go jump in my plane right now and crash it into your house hopefully killing you and your family.





Just kidding

but seriously don't be a faggot

ov420
January 6th 2010


300 Comments


considered

dylantheairplane
January 6th 2010


2181 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

If your going to neg you have to post your reason. If you don't that just makes a douche that needs to gtfo

ov420
January 6th 2010


300 Comments


i didin't neg omg, i'll pos right now if it will stop your whining

dylantheairplane
January 6th 2010


2181 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Maybe if you didnt post mindless comments I wouldn't have to assume.

Parallels
January 6th 2010


10154 Comments


if only he had a dick like lady gaga....

br00talexpress
January 6th 2010


47 Comments


^^^true that!

mvdu
January 6th 2010


992 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Good variety of songwriting here and I LOVE the glam production. Right up my alley, and I'll agree to disagree. This CD made my honorable mentions of 2009.



BTW, I posted my favorite albums of 2009 on my profile page.

inthiscolony
January 7th 2010


12 Comments


it's just another shitty pop album from another faggy pop singer. as disposable as they fucking come.

fr33convict
March 16th 2010


11723 Comments


He should have gone with Queen that way they could get the faggot Paul Rodgers (no pun intended) out of there. Instead Adam and Queen both made crappy albums.

Ocean of Noise
August 23rd 2014


10970 Comments


He's with Queen now!



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy