">
 

Against Me!
Searching for a Former Clarity


2.0
poor

Review

by Garrett_CivilCrisis USER (1 Reviews)
September 11th, 2005 | 43 replies


Release Date: 2005 | Tracklist


Against Me!'s third full-length "Searching for a Former Clarity" (released by Fat Wreck Chords) was a dissapointment. There are a lot of songs about the band's struggle with popularity, but these songs all lack energy. A few songs stand out, but not enough to make it a good album.

1. Miami - This song never stood out to me. The music is boring and the vocals sound cheesey (especially the chorus). It is hard to listen through this entire song.

2. Mediocrity Gets You Pears (The Shaker) - I cannot help but skip this song when I listen to this CD. The verse is so poppy it's annoying. The chorus lacks energy. I can't find anything to like about this song. I have "no connection at all" with Mediocrity Gets You Pears.

3. Justin - There's not much to say about Justin. A slow, stiff song with obviously corny politics. "They're advertising on the TV become a soldier...". That line doesn't make me wanna hear the rest of their statement.

4. Unprotected Sex with Multiple Partners - Everyone can make the relation to that ***ty song "Take Me Out" by Franz Ferdinand, but this is one of the better songs on the album. It's one of the several songs talking about their struggle with popularity.

5. From Her Lips to God's Ears (The Energizer) - I have to say I do enjoy this one. It's one of the faster songs, though still a bit too poppy. The lyrics are more original than the politics of Justin. It's a good sing-along as well.

6. Violence - Once again, a slow, boring as *** song that has no energy or emotion that goes on for a solid 5 minutes. This is a song I go to sleep to. That's all I have to say about Violence.

7. Pretty Girls (The Mover) - This song is a wake-up that Against Me!'s lyrics are going down the drain. "What are you gonna say when she picks up the phone? Should you leave a message when she's not at home? Wanted to know if you'd like to see a movie or get a drink. It'd be cool just to be in your company."??? What the *** happened? And not only do the lyrics suck, the music is obvious.

8. How Low - Ohhhh boy, the worst song on the album. When I first started to listen to it, I was like "it's kinda like the acoustic "You Look Like I Need a Drink"", but as I continued to listen, it got bad... real bad. There's some guest vocals on the chorus, and it's just ***ing corny. The drums sound so mechanical and fake. This is another song I will skip.

9. Joy - I cannot believe they ***ed up a song that's so good. The original (demo) was so much better. It is ruined by a childish twinkle star noise in the backround. So corny. The vocals also seem to be watered down.

10. Holy *** - A pretty good song. I do not have much beef with Holy ***. It tells about how the band is getting sick of doing the same stuff over and over again. I'd have to dat that the lyrics are well-written.

11. Even at Our Worst We're Still Better Than Others (The Roller) - Probably the best song on the album for me. It reminds of 35% for some reason. It has the right emotion that will Against Me! me. This is another song of how they can get sick of all the pressure they get from their fans. You can start to understand where they're coming from with songs like this.

12. Problems - They really slowed this one down from all the other versions I heard, but overall, I'm gonna say it's an imporvent. The vocals are more powerful as is music (though slower). This song has a great ending as well. Another good sing-along.

13. Don't Lose Touch - My god, this catchy, poppy, slow, repetative piece of ***. It gets so ***ing boring, I cannot take it. The drums are so bland and boring it hurts. This song gets old after playing it 2 or 3 times. (Music Video... absolutely disgusts me).

14. Searching for a Former Clarity - A great song. The lyrics are meaningful and deep. This is a solid Against Me! song. A good way to end an album.

In the end, this album is poor. You can tell the band is heading towards the more poppy, watered down side of music. It makes me sad to say that they are losing it. They need to get their exclamation point taken away.


user ratings (582)
3.7
great
other reviews of this album
PuddleSplasher (4)
What would happen if Stephan Malkmus had a relative named Justin who died in Iraq, so he decided to ...

Two-Headed Boy (4.5)
Flordia's Against Me! have been prying into the punk playists for four years now, and their third st...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Toaster
September 11th 2005


343 Comments


Pretty decent review. You don't really describe the genre at all, and if you do a track-by-track, you may want to rate each song. Good otherwise.

Berserker!
September 11th 2005


73 Comments


Too vague.

Happymeal
September 11th 2005


330 Comments


I agree. It looks like something from Forced Listening. People, don't review an album for the sake of being the first one to.

Storm In A Teacup
September 11th 2005


45797 Comments


Isn't this a remake of a review from yesterday or something?

SlappedByTheClash
September 12th 2005


19 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Dude, if you're gonna give an album a bad review, at least give valid reasons. "Boring as a'ss" is not a valid reason.





Besides, even if it wasn't the best AM! record, it's still good. It deserves more than a 2. And I just plain don't like you, considering I had a review written out when you posted yours.



B'astard.

Storm In A Teacup
September 12th 2005


45797 Comments


[quote=SlappedByTheClash] I had a review written out when you posted yours.[/quote]

You can still post another reveiw of this cd, especially if it's a different rating and written better, which I'm sure won't be hard to do.


And I'm pretty sure this GarretCivilCrisis did reveiw this yesterday and it was a lot worse than the new one.
This Message Edited On 09.11.05This Message Edited On 09.11.05This Message Edited On 09.11.05

SlappedByTheClash
September 12th 2005


19 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Yeah, but I don't like reviewing something when it's already been done. Besides, I posted my opinion, so I'm satisfied.

Fabz
September 12th 2005


136 Comments


I prefer the two other Against Me! album, but it deserve much more than 2/5. I still really like the sound, the lyrics are less good in my opinion but it still a good album.

SGlove
September 12th 2005


11 Comments


"The lyrics are less good"
Interesting.

A review after each track would have been beneficial to all of us.This Message Edited On 09.12.05

Garrett_CivilCrisis
September 13th 2005


8 Comments


well arent you guys snobby

the cd blows, no excuses, if you think this is good, youre probably one of those kids that only own eternal and axl... shit album, it deserves a 1, i was being generous

and i never said boring as a'ss, i said boring as fukk... what more do you need to know, you know what boring means, but whatever, be cocky close-minded fags who run pop reviews...

Electric City
September 13th 2005


15756 Comments


I saw Against Me open for Jimmy Eat World and Green Day and sweet god, they're awful. The crowd hated them.

Fabz
September 13th 2005


136 Comments


Green Day and Jimmy Eat World are AWFUL

SlappedByTheClash
September 13th 2005


19 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Well, I love how how you spelled Fuck with 3 letters, and it still got bleeped by the curse censor. 3 Times.





And for the record, I know for a fact that I own more of Against Me's! material. You're just pissed off that everyone criticized your review. Frankly, it sucked. Get over it. I'm done with you, so don't even reply to this. Consider this constructive criticism, and use it to write a fair, unbiased and coherent review.





And the comment about AM! being hated by JEW's fans, well, I got no problems with that. Tom and the guys were never meant for stadiums.

Garrett_CivilCrisis
September 13th 2005


8 Comments


oh my god, whatever, you win with your internet scene.

and am! does belong in stadiums if they want to. i mean, the did sell out. theyre another pop band. front covers of magazines, greenday shows, fat records, pix represses, cencored versions, music videos, 15 dollar tickets sold at strawberrys, front page of myspace, being on sputnikmusic.com (you have to admit theres no other respectable bands on here), etc...

Electric City
September 13th 2005


15756 Comments


(you have to admit theres no other respectable bands on here), etc...



Hmmm how bout any other band on here. Let's see, The BEatles are on here, every good classic rock bands on here, Straylight Run, Green Day (Or r they not "respectable" with their new image?) Nirvana, Jimmy Eat World, The list goes on.

Storm In A Teacup
September 13th 2005


45797 Comments


[quote=Garret Civilcrisis](you have to admit theres no other respectable bands on here)[/quote]

Screw you as's hole why even bother to make an account on here and then do a poor ass reveiw of a band you actually respect, but then call them sellouts.

Soundgarden, Ramones, and Megadeth are respectable are they not?


Ass
This Message Edited On 09.13.05

Brain Toad
September 14th 2005


27 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Horribly vague review, if you are going to give something bad ratings, come up with better opinions

Garrett_CivilCrisis
September 14th 2005


8 Comments


i'm not going to accept against me! progressing because they're progressing into poppy shit. i dont really want the old against me!, i can live without it. its not like theyre some revolutionary band. theyre just another fucking cliche story.

id rather listen to a band with bad music and good kids

and fuck the ramones, punk didnt come from the ramones, punk would be dead if it werent for bands like crass and reagan youth etc. bands like the sex pistols clash are shit.

nirvana was trendy shit as is GD, jimmy eat world? this is fucking MTV

Sid
September 14th 2005


2 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Aren't you cool.



While I disliked this album, I think I'll write a better review.

Storm In A Teacup
September 15th 2005


45797 Comments


Because all other bands he says on this site are unrespectable, yet he calls them sellouts and rates the album low.

Garret, why don't you rate something from the band you like and do it good actually.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy