King Crimson
In the Wake of Poseidon


3.0
good

Review

by Nagrarok USER (219 Reviews)
March 31st, 2010 | 22 replies


Release Date: 1970 | Tracklist

Review Summary: In the Court/Wake of The Crimson King/Poseidon?

Most prog listeners will immediately agree with me when I say that In the Court of the Crimson King was a truly amazing, compelling, creative, daring and overall astounding album. King Crimson, in their first manner of existence, was a unique ensemble. King Fripp himself had a jazz-influenced manner of playing that could be both menacing and calm; it was so unique and inventive that the term ‘Frippian’ was devised by us proggies especially to describe his style. The rest of Crimson, however, was just as talented. Who could forget Lake’s amazing, dreamy voice and equally strong bass performance, McDonald’s multi-instrumental abilities, or Giles’ perfectly-p(l)aced drumming? King Crimson’s first incarnation, as they have often been referred to, was any prog band’s dream line-up.

Then WHY did they have to break up?

Less than a year in the game, the original King Crimson had already disbanded partially, McDonald and Giles not being satisfied with the direction Fripp was steering towards. Truth be told, in the end, Crimson’s ever-revolving formation only makes the group more interesting to listen to and observe as a changing identity. Their second album, In the Wake of Poseidon, however seems basically a repetition of their debut. A lot of similarities can be found between the two, starting with Pictures of a City. The actual opener, which follows after the less-than-a-minute intro Peace: A Beginning, one of the album's three themes, is too obviously a distilled version of the menacing 21st Century Schizoid Man. The riffs and saxophone lead is extremely similar, but less aggressive, it contains an interlude called 42nd at Treadmill that is a same soft copy of Mirrors, and it concludes with the same manner of noise. Even the vocals are again (partially) distorted.

Cadence and Cascade does little to question the conclusion drawn by the album’s first 9 minutes. The only thing that really sets it apart from I Talk to the Wind is the fact that it is led primarily by acoustic guitar instead of flute (though it does have a flute performance later on), and the change of vocalists. Lake had already wanted to leave Crimson prior to the release of Poseidon, forming prog giants Emerson, Lake & Palmer, but negotiated to receive the band’s PA equipment in exchange for singing on the album’s recordings (he doesn’t play bass on this release either, which is a shame, considering his skills). Gordon Haskell, an old friend of Fripp, is the exception on the third track, and would continue with the band in the future.

Let’s get one thing straight though: Pictures of a City and Cadence and Cascade are great songs, inferior copies as they may be. The real problems start to arise with the title track. Guess what? It’s a watered-down Epitaph. An Epitaph without the bone-chilling intro and mellotron arrangement (which Fripp took over from McDonald at this point), perfect vocal delivery and haunting lyrics. Sinfield’s lyricism is still very much fitting with the band’s music, but you can’t help comparing. Those found on In the Court of the Crimson King were amazing weaved together with the enduring tunes. Those found on In the Wake of Poseidon are still trademark Sinfield, but are less effective: the combination of words and musical images made the experience so very powerful. Here, especially the musical factor in the equation was severely lacking.

The last two songs are the most original ones. Cat Food carries, apart from the distorted vocals, no similarity to the group’s debut for the first time (not counting the Peace themes, of course), and is an eclectic piece that provides a much-needed break (the addition of piano really helps here). The Devil’s Triangle is an epic, 10-minute soundscape that encompasses just a few moments of The Court of the Crimson King in it, but thankfully mostly stands on itself instead of becoming a fourth copy. Though an interesting piece, it doesn’t manage to keep up its momentum for the entire running length, similar to what Moonchild couldn’t do.

So yes, it is only two track and three themes that set In the Wake of Poseidon apart from In the Court of the Crimson King. Obviously, that isn’t enough. But looking at the good points, the likes of Pictures of a City and Cadence and Cascade aren’t half bad, the only actual disappointment being the title track. Perhaps it is no real surprise the Crimson tried to copy the success of the first work. That tradition of a changing sound was only to commence with later releases, as becomes clear when listening to the group’s second album. In the Wake of a Poseidon is certainly a major disappointment next to what came before it. It is however by no means a bad album.

In the Wake of Poseidon’s King Crimson was:

- Robert Fripp ~ Guitars, Mellotron, Devices
- Gregory Ron Lake ~ Lead Vocals
- Michael Rex Giles ~ Drums
- Peter John Sinfield ~ Words and Illumination
- Mel Collins ~ Flute, Saxophones
- Peter Giles ~ Bass Guitar
- Keith Tippet ~ Piano
- Gordon Haskell ~ Lead Vocals on 'Cadence and Cascade'




Recent reviews by this author
Genesis Calling All StationsGenesis We Can't Dance
Genesis Invisible TouchGenesis Genesis
Genesis AbacabGenesis Duke
user ratings (1287)
3.8
excellent
other reviews of this album
SgtPepper EMERITUS (4)
It may not be a groundbreaking opus like its predecessor, but it is nonetheless another valued addit...

e210013 (4)
In the wake of their debut, but it’s more than that. It’s more like a cross between their debut ...

rhcp pman (4)
While ITWOP is not as original or groundbreaking as their debut, it is still a very good album. Plea...

Iluvatar (3)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Nagrarok
March 31st 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It's been too long since I gave sputnik another review. Expect Lizard next.

NeutralThunder12
March 31st 2010


8742 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

good job Nagrarok, I actually consider this record to be a tad underrated by Sputnik. Not a masterpiece, but still not bad, even though it is a VERY inconsistent album. And yeah I agree, in a way, this is a worse version of "In the Court" (which is my favorite album of all time), but it's still good. King Crimson albums are inconsistent, but if you get their best, you can't go wrong. Are you going to be doing a King Crimson series??

LeotardMessiah2
March 31st 2010


311 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

King Crimson more like Shit Crimson

Nagrarok
March 31st 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Are you going to be doing a King Crimson series??




I'll do the Sinfield-era albums first (which is up till Islands, and then I'll see where I go from there. I hope to do them all, but I have an open discography running in Black Sabbath and hope to do another 4-album discog somewhere in between as well.

BigHans
March 31st 2010


30959 Comments


Good job Nag, where have you been?

EVedder27
March 31st 2010


6088 Comments


Great review, good to see another review from you. Have yet to hear this.

Observer
Emeritus
March 31st 2010


9403 Comments


agree with mike, good to see you still at it.

Asiatic667
March 31st 2010


4651 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

good album

shindip
April 1st 2010


3539 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

actually enjoy this quite a ton

Nagrarok
April 1st 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Glad you've missed me, Hans, Mike and Jared. I've had a broken laptop for more than a month by now, and thus my sputnik activities have been rather limited in recent times. If that hadn't been the case, my review count would have been much higher. Anyway, I plan to get back at the job now.

Piglet
April 1st 2010


8482 Comments


I was going to buy this today, but didn't.

Jethro42
April 1st 2010


18280 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It's easy to compare this album with their previous masterpiece ITCOTCK, and blame their too strong similarities. All indications are that King Crimson have made this album from some previous leftovers. Probably yeah, like it uses to happen between x album feeding the following y one. And then?...Why would they let their treasures in the hold?...An if album is so-called inconsistent, it's actually in its shape rather than in contents. The imposing and fierce 'The Devil's Triangle' hits hard with its bolero from hell, and has a paralyzing and fatal grip, similar to an acid trip, while the Peace Theme is not convincing at all, comes in sparse doses, vain, nebulous and forgettable. This is a case of two weights, two measures, and it came off balance an album that was intended to be as impressive as the previous one, really.



Apart from these weaknesses, the album has its strong points. 'Pictures of a City' (21st Century Schizoid Man II for some) is still a favorite of mine. 'In The Wake Of Poseidon' (Epitaph II for some) is a deep and intense art of work. It may stick in your head for hours. 'Cat Food' (could easily fit on 'Lizard') is a ludic, refreshing rocker. 'Cadence and Cascade' (I Talk to the Wind II for some) is peaceful and warm. Would have been sweet if they took the song to strengthen the Peace Theme, and kind of merge it to defy the psychotic and merciless 'Devil's Triangle' and just make an epic final for a triumphant win, for instance. Overall I still think that this album don't get all the attention it deserves. Its minor imperfections should not make a difference. I strongly recommend this. Call it 'In The Court Of The Crimson King II' if it helps.



Excellent review Nag. You back up very well your points.

This was meant to be a 'Sound Off', but it didn't work.



EVedder27
April 1st 2010


6088 Comments


Jethro, it probably didn't work as a soundoff because the soundoffs only allow for a certain length. Probably too long.

Jethro42
April 1st 2010


18280 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah that's what I thought.



EVedder27
May 16th 2010


6088 Comments


I'm actually really enjoying this

AnotherBrick
May 16th 2010


9807 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

my 2nd favorite KC album

vanderb0b
August 10th 2010


3473 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Listened to this, I actually really like it. Title track would slay so much if it didn't try to be Epitaph.

SgtPepper
Emeritus
June 12th 2012


4510 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Good review, theres a lot of people who dont likes this album. It has certainly grown on me over time. POS'd.

AcidCaravan
December 27th 2013


503 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Great review, even if I love this album. Yes, the Crimson pretty much stick with the previous album's formula on here, but the songs quality's always amazing.

DDDeftoneDDD
August 29th 2019


22325 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

My feelings on this one too...not only a copy of the formula but a watered one...still a great record.

I plan to jam Devil's Triangle countlessly



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy