Underoath
Ø (Disambiguation)


4.5
superb

Review

by UORawker USER (8 Reviews)
May 4th, 2011 | 44 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Underoath’s consistency and creativity keep them creating music that is both intense and challenging.

With Aaron Gillespie and a chunk of their fan base gone, you could say that Underoath (and replacement drummer Daniel Davison) had a lot to prove. The loss of the beloved vocalist/drummer brought about many questions and concerns about the future of the band. However, Underoath has proven that they are more than just one talented musician by releasing one of the strongest albums of 2010 and one of the best surprises for their fans.

Immediately as the record starts, it sets the tone as dark and brooding. Gone is the fun catchiness that plagued past albums and we plunge full force in to the darkness of addiction, struggle, and uncertainty. The lyrics are as well-written as ever and the musicianship sets up the tone of the whole album as only the expert musicians in Underoath can do. Daniel Davison is a most welcome addition to the group as his stylistic drumming fits right in to the bands overall vision. Spencer Chamberlain has taken the throne of the only vocalist and listeners won’t be displeased. We still get treated to a good amount of guttural growls and screams but his clean vocals are much more focused and on-key.

The best thing that can be said about this album is its tightness. Everything transitions together perfectly and creates a “more than just music” feeling. This is the type of album that is best to be listened to in one sitting in order to get the full effect of what the band is trying to accomplish. The album is a great deal more piercing and intense than anything they’ve ever done. It’s definitely not a light listen.

Although the album is best to listen to as a single entity, that doesn’t mean that you can’t listen to a single song and not enjoy it. The single off the album, “Illuminator” is a great taste of what the rest of the album brings. It even has a slight degree of the aforementioned “catchiness” from their Aaron days. The song “Paper Lung” is an exceptional tribute to the style of Tool and Deftones. Don’t confuse “tribute” with “rip-off” as Underoath makes it their own with their signature ambient guitar work and Spencer’s growling. However, the absolute pinnacle of the album happens on the ninth track “Vacant Mouth” with exceptional, well constructed drum work and the always welcome choral track overlapping with Spencer’s improved vocals.

In point of fact, I believe the only negative thing that can be said about the album is its length is too short, weighing in at only 38 minutes (Between the Buried and Me just released a 3-track EP that is 30 minutes long) . As the last track comes to an end you’re left with a sense of wanting more. But it puts Underoath fans in a perpetual state of suspense for what’s coming up next for the band. I, for one, am extremely excited for the future of Underoath.

If you HAVE to listen to just one or two tracks I’d recommend Paper Lung and Vacant Mouth.



Recent reviews by this author
Blessthefall AwakeningUnderoath Define the Great Line
Death Cab for Cutie Codes and KeysDestroy Rebuild Until God Shows D.R.U.G.S.
Page 9 Addiction in RecoveryA Skylit Drive Identity on Fire
user ratings (1877)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of
  • Athom EMERITUS (4)
    They were made for this...

    wyankeif1337 (4.5)
    With a major lineup change and a heap of new influences, Underoath unleash what is indispu...

    Alexd93 (4.5)
    A Dark, Haunting, and Powerful Experience. Truly Superb....

    ebay (4.5)
    Chamberlain's fix set Underoath on an arguably improved path....

  • Chevy182 (5)
    An ever evolving/changing band finally achieves consistency, Ø (Disambiguation) proves to...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Pyosisified
May 4th 2011


2450 Comments


horrible band neg

kingjulian
May 4th 2011


1799 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Not a bad review, though I don't think it's very accurate to say "Gone is the fun catchiness that plagued past albums." TOCS was their only album you could possibly say that about imo. DTGL and LITSOS are pretty freaking dark, massive and brooding, and their stuff before TOCS was basically death metal.

Pyosisified
May 4th 2011


2450 Comments


"and their stuff before TOCS was basically death metal"

lmao you sure know your shit

kingjulian
May 4th 2011


1799 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

There are a few things I simply cannot take seriously in this album: The absurd amount of lyrical cliches and that stupid farting beat in Reversal. In Division, Divine Eradication, Vacant Mouth and Deteriorating Incline absolutely rule, tho.



Ah wut, 1000 comments.





tkxxx7
May 4th 2011


6168 Comments


It’s definitely is not a light listen.


*It is definitely not

Don’t confuse “tribute” with “rip-off” the style is that same but Underoath claims it with their signature ambient guitar work and Spencer’s growling.


Bad grammar, slightly confusing.

Otherwise nice review. I'd give it a 4 (If I haven't already). I actually don't think the album is too short, but I wish more of it were like Paper Lung. The lyrics aren't amazing but they aren't bad either, and I honestly think that Aaron held them back on previous releases. Here, they feel at home with their sound, whether it be the slow rolling before the huge climax on Paper Lung, the frenzied screams on the opener, or the closing track's roooooooooooooar.

tkxxx7
May 4th 2011


6168 Comments


pos'd on the good faith that you'll make those tiny corrections

UORawker
May 4th 2011


123 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah but if you look at songs like "Writing on the Walls" and "Too Bright To See Too Loud To Hear" and compare them to "Illuminator" and "Paper Lung" there is a DEFINITE difference in catchiness... Even the heavier songs on DTGL still have catchy choruses. They got rid of it a bit in LITSOS but it was still there... I still think that DTGL is one of the best hard rock albums ever made. I was just making a point that if you're looking for catchy, sing along choruses that were featured in past albums then you'd be disappointed by this album.

kingjulian
May 4th 2011


1799 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

'kay whatever, modern death metal/metalcore/emo. I'm not saying it was good (it really wasn't) but they were going for a death metalish sound. Ugh what am I doing trying to reason with you anyway.

Pyosisified
May 4th 2011


2450 Comments


yea just shut up

kingjulian
May 4th 2011


1799 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

@UORawker: I gotcha. It just sort of sounded like you were implying that their past stuff was sprinkled with pixie dust or something lol not really but you know what I mean. I see what you're saying, tho.

tkxxx7
May 4th 2011


6168 Comments


um.

UORawker
May 4th 2011


123 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

@kingjulian Congratulations on 1000 comments lol...



I'm still pretty new to writing reviews but I'm enjoying every second of it! To me, it seems like a near-perfect release. I don't think they were going for a "Death-Metal" sound. I think they were going for a dark sound and they achieved it but they didn't step outside of their element to do it. I think Aaron's writing held them back as well. He seemed to have the need to have light spots in the albums (the catchy points) that didn't always quite fit.



@tkxxx7 Thanks for the grammar corrections. I fixed them and I think it looks better.

kingjulian
May 4th 2011


1799 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Just makin' sure you know I was saying they were going for a death metalish sound with their oooold stuff (act of depression and cries of the past), not this lol. This is a good album but I do enjoy DTGL and LITSOS more for various reasons. I guess I envy you because I really wanted to love this haha but keep reviewing!

SHAKEandBAKE
May 4th 2011


1346 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

I just can't take this guy seriously.



UORAWKER? C'mon now...

kingjulian
May 4th 2011


1799 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

my name was BTBAMF when I joined. Changed that as soon as I learned I could.

Trebor.
Emeritus
May 4th 2011


59850 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I don't get it.

Maniac!
May 4th 2011


28545 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"is its length is too short weighing in at only 38 minutes "



needs a comma after 'short'

UORawker
May 4th 2011


123 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Lol What? I like Underoath... But I did my best to remain objective in the review... I think I achieved it... If UO's next release is god awful then I'll rate it as such... I can't STAND anything before TOCS and TOCS was just OK...

twlight
May 4th 2011


8732 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

rating is too high

UORawker
May 4th 2011


123 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Its a damn near perfect album... How is the rating too high?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy