Morbid Angel
Illud Divinum Insanus


1.5
very poor

Review

by Necrotica USER (196 Reviews)
December 11th, 2011 | 89 replies


Release Date: 2011 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An inglorious song-burst of tragedy and pain.

One really has to wonder what some bands want from their fans, let alone their fame. When we last saw Morbid Angel, they were in a bit of a slump with 2003's Heretic. While the album had it's own perks, it showed the band growing a little stale in the creative department, especially considering the legendary statuses of past efforts like 1993's Covenant and 1989's Altars of Madness. After 8 years apart, one would honestly think that a band like this one would make a solid return to form and get back to basics... and yet, to say that this is not the case is a massive understatement.

First of all, the line-up is a tad different from the last couple of releases, bringing back David Vincent but with no Pete Sandoval (!) this time around. Considering that David Vincent was in the classic golden-era of the band, it was expected that he and Trey Azagthoth would get the creative juices flowing again and create their good-old death metal. And what do we get? An industrial/quasi-darkwave/bone-headed metal album???

It's safe to say that if the material presented here was on a Marylin Manson or Rob Zombie album, it wouldn't be considered too bad. On the other hand, having Morbid Angel try to experiment with this kind of work is certainly in vain. Just one look at the songtitles could be enough to show how bad and corny the quality is; We've got songs like "Radikult (what the f*ck is a Radikult?)," "Destructos Vs. the Earth/Attack (which now has a dance remix... ugh)," and "I Am Morbid (wooo, clever!)."

For the sake of remaining glass-half-full here, I'll mention some positives that warrant the 1.5. YES, there is some death metal buried within the sh*t-mound here. Among the most noteworthy songs on the album are "Blades of Baal" and "Nevermore," both of which display the band's signature riffing and powerful guttural growls. Unfortunately, even these songs tend to sound like pale imitations of better tracks Morbid Angel made in the past, and sometimes they lose their way and eventually the music has a bit of a bland quality.

Now for the rest of this album: As it's been seen with the general diversity of the albums I review on this site, it can be said that I like experimentation. If you don't experiment, you don't know if it's going to work or not, right? Morbid Angel took this concept and escalated it to a new level that most bands wouldn't have the balls to even attempt. Unfortunately, it's a failed experiment in this case, as cheesy industrial work isn't exactly their strong suit. Also, in certain areas, it seems that the band are trying to imitate Devin Townsend, what with the wall of sound and forced humor; However, where Townsend revels comfortably within this territory, Morbid Angel simply sound like they're trying too hard here, and suffer as a result.

One other thing: If there's one song that has to be mentioned over ALL the others on this album, it's Radikult. This song is simply one of the worst imitations of industrial metal out in the market today, from the cringe-worthy vocals to the drums which sound like a kid with mental retardation pounding on a keg. Even the "sinister" build-up at the beginning is weak, trying too hard to have a darkwave-influenced sound to boot. Overall, the song pretty much sums up the numerous flaws plaguing the album.

The last thing I'd like to bring up; the vocals. David Vincent's voice sounds about as unappealing as James Hetfield did on Metallica's St. Anger. Also similar to that album's vocals are the chanted "Hey Hey Hey" shouts and the bone-headed caveman-sounding grunts. David Vincent used to have such an intimidating voice back when Covenant was released in 1993, but now he sounds like he's attempting a mix of nu-metal and thrash. He simply adds to the disappointing quality of the record rather than improving it.

All in all, this album provides a few lessons: 1. Don't try to "modernize" music with genres that don't fit in your style; 2. Actually tell fans before you try something new (the singles preceding the album were the death metal ones); and 3. Try to freshen things up with a little diversity, or the album will become riddled with banality as this one is.

Please do not buy this.

For this album, Morbid Angel are:

David Vincent – bass guitar, keyboard, vocals
Trey Azagthoth – guitar
Destructhor – guitar
Tim Yeung – drums



Recent reviews by this author
Genesis Selling England by the PoundTool Fear Inoculum
Taylor Swift LoverCarnifex World War X
Kendrick Lamar To Pimp a ButterflyYanni In My Time
user ratings (940)
1.6
very poor
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
December 11th 2011


18257 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I agree,

Aids
December 11th 2011


24512 Comments


jesus christ Valerius you are such a dumbass

DeadBeat
December 11th 2011


529 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Pos





Album is complete shit

Wizard
December 11th 2011


20512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

David Vincent was in the classic golden-era of the band, it was expected that he and Trey Azagthoth would get the creative juices flowing again and create their good-old death metal. And what do we get? An industrial/quasi-darkwave/bone-headed metal album???



Once again I reiterate my statement, you fucking retards expected this to be Morbid Angel when everybody should have known full well that David Vincent would take this in the direction he's been heading towards since Heretic. He did several interviews saying the same fucking thing so why everyone is butthurt is completely beyond me. I think this album is a case where you almost have to catagorize the band as another sub-genre of metal which you did right here:



It's safe to say that if the material presented here was on a Marylin Manson or Rob Zombie album, it wouldn't be considered too bad.



This redeems your review to some extent but I still think you and the rest of the people reviewing the album need to focus on the facts and not the expectations of the fans. I'm not defending this album by any means even though I enjoy it from an industrial metal standpoint. The hate train that people have jumped on is totally unnecessary given that people were retarded in thinking this might be another Altars of Madness.

GodL1ke
December 11th 2011


809 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

agreed. even though i don't objectively like this album, there's no need to criticize the band coz of your mislead expectations

DeadBeat
December 11th 2011


529 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

It's not just because of people's mislead expectations, I would give this album the same rating even

if it had been released by any other band.

GodL1ke
December 11th 2011


809 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

it's not just about you alone and i don't think you can speak for the rest. most comments clearly show that people are hating on this album because it isn't another old school death record. check wizard's quote from the review to see what he means rather than misinterpreting.

Pharoh
December 11th 2011


3325 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

This review is.. Too Extreme!

bloc
December 11th 2011


70183 Comments


Album is too extreme

HeathenEarthling
December 11th 2011


93 Comments


For what it's worth, I like industrial metal a lot more than I like death metal, and I do not like anything I've heard from Illud Divinum Insanus. All around fail.

BallsToTheWall
December 12th 2011


51228 Comments


That band picture....ugh...

xorax
December 12th 2011


96 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I don't think I hated this album as much as everybody else did.

Ignimbrite
December 12th 2011


6880 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

well duh

Trebor.
Emeritus
December 12th 2011


59861 Comments


This is a joke right

Pharoh
December 12th 2011


3325 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

yeah

Wizard
December 12th 2011


20512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

1. Yes, I realize it was a bit of a fanboyish statement, but they really didn't reveal anything about their new direction, considering their singles were misleading.



2. David Vincent wasn't even in Heretic, that was Steve Tucker.




Singles were misleading but his interviews where he's talking about his love of disco and shit.....come on!



And I realize Vincent wasn't on Heretic but at least the band was pulling towards this direction, you can hear it.

Wizard
December 13th 2011


20512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

They're terrible songs but I have to admit that they're catchy and fun if you don't take them seriously. It's like a guilty pleasure of mine and I dig industrial metal which this totally is.



And I apologize for coming off like a douche, I was only complaining about how people critique this with a tiny magnifier instead of putting it into it's proper context.

KILL
December 13th 2011


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

i dig it too but this is just bad i mean come on wizard the wise

Wizard
December 13th 2011


20512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Bad =/= unlistenable. And I'm far from wise hahahaha.

KILL
December 13th 2011


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

yea but i'd rather not listen to bad music i dont know



GHOULS ATTACK THE CHURCH



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy