Crystal Castles
Crystal Castles III


2.0
poor

Review

by derho USER (31 Reviews)
December 1st, 2012 | 19 replies


Release Date: 2012 | Tracklist

Review Summary: This is no longer the dancehall of my nightmares

It’s been 6 years since Crystal Castles released their first single. Bands are like people. Some mature and gain wisdom with age, while others refuse to grow up. A select few reach the dreaded brick wall of dark faux-enlightenment and end up just being jaded. We tend to avoid those people. Negativity can be suffocating. All we can do is hope, for their sakes, that they figure out what a waste of time it is to be stuck neck-deep in depressing thoughts all day long.

Crystal Castles’ third release, "III", is a funny thing. The band clearly, in their own way, were grasping at the mainstream here, but that doesn’t mean its welcoming. Quite the contrary, the mixing is odd, alternatively distant and abrasive. They’ve taken sandpaper to their sound, and in some places just rubbed a little too hard for too long. The dynamism and momentum of past releases are gone, no matter how hard the forceful club-beats try to convince you otherwise.

In contrast to the evenly-paced "II", more restrained (I shudder to say accessible) numbers dominate here, and generally end up sounding watery. When the band does go off (and they do), it seems more slapped together mess than carefully orchestrated chaos. “Insulin” plays a half-hearted electro-hardcore jam that got mangled somewhere between Pro-tools and the final pressing. The idiosyncrasies that seemed so fresh before (ex: sampled vocals as an instrument) seem worn out. It’s not that they couldn’t have been used effectively, there just wasn’t a will for it.

This is the music of a group that has seen a darkness, but it’s in no way enlightening. In fact, it comes off as patronizing, sheltering. “I’ll protect you from/ all the things I’ve seen” vocalist Alice Glass deadpans over the subdued spasms of “Kerosene.” We’re big kids, Alice. We can handle it.

The band’s iconoclastic status makes it all too easy for defenders to write off missteps as social statements of some kind. But statements still need to say *something*. I’d prefer to think of the Castles as drained, but it wouldn’t be a stretch to say they were bored in the making of "III". The repetition and lack of originality, paired with some mild weird-you-out effects, fails to capture me as satirical barbing of boring top-40 trash. It’s more of a dry parody of their earlier work.

Crystal Castles have always made the music for the resistance to some imagined Orwellian world-state, so what is "III"? Are they telling us the struggle just isn’t worth it anymore? This is a band that has been tenaciously experimental throughout their career. I really hope they get back on track.

4.5/10



Recent reviews by this author
Talking Heads Remain in LightYouth Lagoon Wondrous Bughouse
The Men New MoonParquet Courts Light Up Gold
Foxygen We Are The 21st Century Ambassadors...The Pop Group Y
user ratings (506)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
Trebor. EMERITUS (2.5)
We demand to be taken seriously...

diseasedracoon (4)
Crystal Castles 2012 album (III) is like diving into a warped, melancholic world governed by bleak d...

disappearhere (4)
Returning with their third album, Crystal Castles show that they are more consistent than ever. Surp...

BrianE (4)
Alice Glass is aghast with world injustice...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Trebor.
Emeritus
December 1st 2012


59868 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Sweet

derho
December 1st 2012


307 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

glad to have a bit of consensus. I saw the rating distribution and got confused. Am I missing all the "excellent" in here?

Trebor.
Emeritus
December 1st 2012


59868 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

I don't know man, my review got neg'd hard because of the rating

derho
December 1st 2012


307 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

awk hahah so much for my nice looking approval rating. Oh well, I'm sticking by it

Funeralopolis
December 1st 2012


14586 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

so much for my approval rating



1 out of 1 liked it

derho
December 1st 2012


307 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I was referring to Trebor's comment about people's response to his review

Trebor.
Emeritus
December 1st 2012


59868 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

If you post a review for an album a while after it came out on the weekend you won't get neg'd hard usually

Unless it's like Brand New or something

PistolPete
December 1st 2012


5303 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Still don't get the hate for this, it was pretty solid IMO (nothing truly special, but solid). Well-written though, that first paragraph really spoke to me. Thank you.

WashboardSuds
December 1st 2012


5101 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"Still don't get the hate for this"



ditto

Tyrael
December 1st 2012


21108 Comments


sigh

Aids
December 1st 2012


24512 Comments


"Am I missing all the "excellent" in here?"

no, this band really fucking sucks, but everyone likes them for some reason. I can't figure it out.

GlassApplesause
December 1st 2012


12 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

the 3.6-7 average ratings for each of their albums doesn't entail that "everyone" likes them

VheissuCrisis
Emeritus
December 1st 2012


1389 Comments


Good work here, pos. Still need to get this, I enjoyed their second album.

anarchistfish
December 1st 2012


30344 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

singer's hot 4.5/5

someguest
December 2nd 2012


30126 Comments


singer's hot 4.5/5


what the fuck are you on?

and can I have some?

Polyethylene
December 2nd 2012


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

She's hot in a weird anorexic banshee way. 3.5/5

Polyethylene
December 2nd 2012


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Which is also my rating for this album atm, cccooosssmmmmiiiicccccc

anarchistfish
December 2nd 2012


30344 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

http://images.askmen.com/women/singer/alice-glass/large_image-1.jpg



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/Alice_Glass_C.jpg/800px-Alice_Glass_C.jpg

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
December 2nd 2012


32289 Comments


I mean she's not unattractive, but...



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy