Judas Priest
Redeemer of Souls


3.0
good

Review

by ExplosiveOranges USER (72 Reviews)
July 3rd, 2014 | 31 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Priest delivers a mixed bag that nonetheless stands out on its own when compared to other recent albums.

In almost every classic heavy metal band’s career, there is a certain time period, be it only one album or a string of releases, in which the band hit their climax, be it critically or commercially. For Black Sabbath, it was from Sabbath Bloody Sabbath to Sabotage. For Metallica, it was from Ride the Lightning to their self-titled album. For Judas Priest…. Well, it depends. Critically, Priest hit their zenith from Sad Wings of Destiny to Stained Class, but commercially, it was from British Steel to Defenders of the Faith. However, it is mostly agreed that the band’s undisputed masterpiece came in their 1990 comeback album, Painkiller. But, unfortunately, as with Sabbath and Metallica, Priest was never able to truly rise back up to what they once were. Sure, Angel of Retribution was a nice return to form after the travesty now known as the Ripper Owens era, but even then, after the excitement of Rob Halford’s return died down, the album just didn’t seem to be anything besides above average. Worse still, in 2011, longtime guitarist K.K. Downing left the band, and the band ceased any studio activity for the next two years, leaving fans with the disappointing Nostradamus as the seemingly final taste of Judas Priest that they would ever get. Then, last year, Priest began making several announcements leading up to the release of a new album: Redeemer of Souls. In the following months, the fanbase turned into a warzone. Some argued that the band sounded too old and tired, and that they should simply stick to touring live. Others showered praise upon the band, and stated that no one could remain a true Priest fan unless they had undying devotion to everything the band would release. So, the question remained: Could Judas Priest finally create the masterpiece that we had all yearned for them to give to us?

The answer is yes, and no.

Right off the bat, there will be several glaring problems within the music. Rob can’t sing as high as he used to, Richie is an inferior replacement for K.K., and the lyrics are okay at their best and cringe-worthy at their worst. But here’s the thing: These “problems” shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone. Rob is 63 years old, K.K. was one of the greatest metal guitarists of all time, and essentially all of the band’s post-Stained Class lyrics are cheesy as hell. These “problems” are benign and aren’t capable of truly “ruining” the music for anyone who has spent even a remote period of time listening to 80’s Priest. But, are there actually any positives for the album? The short answer is, yes.

Richie is definitely nowhere near as respected, skilled, or accomplished as K.K., but he does actually make decent use of his talents. Sure, the riffs aren’t anything you haven’t already heard before, but they still do manage to come off as somewhat catchy. Lead guitarist Glenn Tipton is a different story. His input isn’t bad by any means, but his solos don’t nearly have the flair or energy of earlier works, and just sound, dare I say it, lazy. Surprisingly, the best performance on the album comes from drummer Scott Travis, who keeps a steady support for the other instruments with solid drum beats and makes do with even the most monotonous of fills. The biggest disappointment comes from bassist Ian Hill, who, as the last remaining member of the original incarnation of Judas Priest, could put out more of a standout performance from an unexpected end of the musical spectrum. Unfortunately, he usually just blends in with Richie and Glenn, and there are times where his bass is far too low in the mix. This may not be a big deal to most fans, but it just feels like they could’ve done more with him. And that’s ultimately where this album’s Achilles heel lies. The band just sounds tired. It’s almost as though they recorded an album only because of the fact that their record label forced them into it as part of a contract, and they came up with the songs as quickly as possible to compensate for a lack of ideas.

Overall, if you’re a big fan of Painkiller or Priest’s 80’s material, you’ll probably dig this album. However, if you were hoping for a love letter from the 70’s (and if so…… really?), you will be disappointed greatly. But to say that this is somehow the final nail in the Metal Gods’ coffin would be straight-up hyperbole. There are still some fantastic tracks on here, such as “Halls of Valhalla”. To exaggerate and say “R.I.P. Priest” is just absurd. It’s obvious, that, like most bands, Judas Priest will never truly be able to recapture what made them so amazing in their youth. But to just dismiss the fact that, even in their 60’s, the members are still alive and kicking, would be downright disrespectful. Because in the end, this isn’t Priest’s version of Brave New World or Endgame. It’s closer to 13 by Black Sabbath or Death Magnetic by Metallica: Not great, but still a much better piece of work compared to their recent albums.



Recent reviews by this author
Every Time I Die Low TeensAsking Alexandria The Black
School of Seven Bells SVIIBTextures Phenotype
Fat White Family Songs for Our MothersIntervals The Shape of Colour
user ratings (596)
3.2
good
other reviews of this album
1 of
  • Jordan M. EMERITUS (3)
    "...feel as though nobody cares, if we live or die..."...

    MetalMeltdown (4)
    Steadfast, strong that's for sure!...

    kvltwalter (3.5)
    Priest return from rock opera territory with a largely by-the-numbers release. Unfortunate...

    Xenorazr (2.5)
    Once again, the Priest is back. And they're not getting any younger....

  • Friday13th (2.5)
    No amount of heavy riffs can redeem the soul of this recycled mess....

    PsychicChris (4)
    Redeemer of Souls is a respectable outing if this does turn out to be Priest's last effort...



Comments:Add a Comment 
ExplosiveOranges
July 3rd 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

And thus, the great Judas Priest debate of 2014 begins. Feedback and constructive criticism welcome as always.

betray
July 3rd 2014


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Disagree slightly with the rating but fantastic review





"But here’s the thing: These “problems” shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone. Rob is 63 years old, K.K. was one of the greatest metal guitarists of all time, and essentially all of the band’s post-Stained Class lyrics are cheesy as hell. "



Very solid point for all the people rating 1.5/2

Friday13th
July 3rd 2014


7623 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Nice. I disagree of course on the magnitude of this disappointment, but you bring up some good points. I have no idea how you can distinguish between the guitarists on this album though haha. I assume when the guitar solo pans from left to right it's a trade off, but other than that I can just tell it's all pretty standard riffs/solos. Travis is solid though I would expect no less. Ian Hill...lol why do you even bother bringing him up since he hasn't played a decent bass line since God only knows how long.

ExplosiveOranges
July 3rd 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Thanks, fellas. As for the whole bass thing: I really don't know. Maybe somehow, Ian could see this album as his opportunity to shine. Guess not. Honestly, though, you all have to agree that this is way better than Nostradamus.

Friday13th
July 3rd 2014


7623 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I haven't listened to all of Nostradamus, but the the t/t and "Persecution" are better than anything on here for no other reason than Halford still sounds godly.

jefflebowski
July 3rd 2014


8573 Comments


http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/jul/03/judas-priest-rob-halford-quentin-crisp-interview-redeemer-of-souls

pretty good interview with halford in the guardian, he comes across as a completely awesome guy, even if the writer makes the common UK press mistake of calling british steel their best

ExplosiveOranges
July 3rd 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Halford is a cool guy, but he sadly doesn't have the same vox that he used to.

jefflebowski
July 3rd 2014


8573 Comments


anyone who says 'metal will find its way into your heart if you accept it' with a straight face in an
interview has my undying respect forever

Friday13th
July 3rd 2014


7623 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

The guy is more metal than stainless steel...but he's rusting vocally. He should continue to host metal concerts or something awesome like that.

ExplosiveOranges
July 3rd 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Halford > Ozzy

betray
July 3rd 2014


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

"The guy is more metal than stainless steel...but he's rusting vocally."



zing

danielcardoso
July 3rd 2014


11770 Comments


"Halford > Ozzy"

Without question, Oranges.
Great review, I pos'd it.
Don't know if I'll check this out.

ExplosiveOranges
July 3rd 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Halls of Valhalla is probably the best track on here.

danielcardoso
July 3rd 2014


11770 Comments


I'll listen to that track, to see if it sparks some interest in me to check out this album.

ExplosiveOranges
July 3rd 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Honestly, this album is getting way more shit thrown at it than it really deserves. It's not bad, but it does sound tired.

SteveTurnsInsideYou
July 3rd 2014


48 Comments


don't understand the hate for this, it's much better than nostradamus

ExplosiveOranges
July 3rd 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

^ Egg-fucking-zactly!

RunOfTheMill
July 3rd 2014


4515 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

very nice review, still haven't gotten around to listening, but I will in due time. Like Betray, I totally agree with that point, very well put

Achilles32094
July 3rd 2014


8 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I really don't understand how anyone can be disappointed with this album. After they were supposedly retiring I'd say any Priest is good Priest. Who are we to say they should retire if making music is what they want to do? But if you were naive enough to believe Priest could top Painkiller in their 60's, or if you were expecting that, then you were setting yourself up for disappointment. Appreciate it for what it is rather than trash it for what its not.

trackbytrackreviews
July 3rd 2014


3469 Comments


13 >>>>>>>>> Death Magnetic



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy