Metallica
St. Anger


4.0
excellent

Review

by BackInBlue USER (3 Reviews)
March 7th, 2015 | 36 replies


Release Date: 2003 | Tracklist

Review Summary: it aint that bad guys.

I relly, really like metallica. they are one of my top favorite bands next to Disturbed and Seether. this album, titled st anger, was different from all there other stuff so of course it got $hit. but in reality it aint that bad to be hinest.

but it DOES have bad things about it. like the vocals. James sounds like lars stuck his wee wee in his throat and he cant get it out. his worst singing is on Shoot Me Again and frantic, the latter is actually good btw. the album has some of the bands finest moments thogh like on "Some Kind of Monster" i thunk if this song were an instrumental, it would be better. but instead, we got $#||ty vocals.

the album, aside from alot of solid songs, also has nice and raw production. Some people may not like it cause it sounds like nu metal and ya know, nu metal sucks (coughLIMPBIZKITcough) but it can be really pleasing to some fans. now , to some metallica fans or just metal fans in general, this band is the definition of sellout. I disagree. The band just wanted to try different things, just let them fu€<ing do that.

overall st anger is a solid album, despite a few downsides. dont overlook it and give it at least one chance. this is BackInBlue, signing off.

rating: 4/5


user ratings (6320)
2
poor
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
JJKeys
March 7th 2015


1322 Comments


Nice meme :^)

LaughingSkull
March 7th 2015


860 Comments


they are one of my top favorite bands next to Disturbed and Seether


Stopped reading there.

Anyway, even if I agree that St Anger is definitely not that bad, and I prefer it to Cum and pre-Cum, you have a lot to learn in writing reviews.

JJKeys
March 7th 2015


1322 Comments


You didn't stop reading after BackInBlue somehow spelled 'really' in two different ways right next to eachother?

WesleyJones
March 7th 2015


199 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"Cum and pre-Cum" ?????????

WesleyJones
March 7th 2015


199 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Awful review btw

Alastor
March 7th 2015


2151 Comments


thunk thogh.

Tunaboy45
March 7th 2015


18425 Comments


Title track isn't bad but other than that...

Artuma
March 7th 2015


32769 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

2nd paragraph = insta pos

Confucius
March 7th 2015


505 Comments


lol

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
March 7th 2015


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 2.3

Apply for staff

rockandmetaljunkie
March 7th 2015


9620 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"you have a lot to learn in writing reviews"



the teacher has spoken

Supercoolguy64
March 7th 2015


11787 Comments


MY LIFESTYLE
DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE

MattTD
March 7th 2015


678 Comments


Good god this review

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
March 7th 2015


11570 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This is backinblue signing off

Totengott
March 7th 2015


4252 Comments


''2nd paragraph = insta pos''

LOL.

Supercoolguy64
March 7th 2015


11787 Comments


in reality it aint that bad to be hinest.

Subho
March 7th 2015


128 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"thunk"



How gangsta!

VaxXi
March 7th 2015


4418 Comments


titled st anger, was different from all there other stuff so of course it got $hit

When will people understand that just because it's different does not mean it's good? Also, the irony of this statement is that Metallica changed their sound for The Black Album but no one really shits on it except metal purists.

turnip90210
March 7th 2015


451 Comments


wow *winks*

michaelmyerstbh
March 7th 2015


144 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Apply for staff



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy