The Who
Tommy


3.5
great

Review

by elcrawfodor USER (5 Reviews)
March 19th, 2015 | 24 replies


Release Date: 1969 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An expansive and ambitious album that collapses under its own weight.

Some of the most successful works of art are successful largely because of their ambiguity. Authors such as Mark Twain and Herman Melville specialized in setting up a conflict for the reader only to never fully resolve it, allowing for the ambiguity to challenge the reader to draw their own conclusions. A work’s ambiguity is only as strong as its implementation, however, and there’s a fine line between the moral uncertainty that challenges a listener and a mere lack of substance masquerading as inconclusiveness. Although an instrumentally strong album and holding the historic distinction as the first successful “rock opera,” The Who’s overly ambitious Tommy buckles under the weight of its own concept, asking the listener to draw a conclusion without providing any real substance to go off of.

Instrumentally, Tommy fails to reveal any significant faults. The Who had evolved from the loud and raucous band that brought “My Generation” to the radio back in 1965 and were developing a more progressive-minded type of storytelling rock that had already been hinted at in “A Quick One, While He’s Away." Trading in his electric guitars (perhaps after smashing too many) for a mostly acoustic-minded approach, Pete Townshend brings us some of the most impressive acoustic work of his career, using complex strumming patterns and acoustic finger work to create complicated and memorable musical themes throughout the album, many of which are highlighted in the opening “Overture." Many of the songs focus on these acoustic backings with beautiful and memorable harmonies between Townshend and Roger Daltrey, who avoid the energetic and hyper-masculine vocals of their earlier works and settle for a more restrained and thoughtful approach. These layers of melodies are accompanied by John Entwistle’s smattering of horn sections pervading the album, and, like any self-respecting band with a bloated concept album, Keith Moon gets to hit a gong at some point. Moon’s drumming deserves praise here too. Following suit with the rest of the band, he’s more constrained in Tommy when compared to the rest of The Who’s discography, but he still lets loose a variety of frenzied drum fills and patterns to spice up the rest of the record. The music rarely drags (with the exception of “Underture” who repeats the same musical theme for 10 minutes), and the vocal melodies are pleasant enough to enrich the entire listening experience.

Historically, however, Tommy isn’t an album remembered for its instrumental prowess but rather for introducing the “rock opera” format to the masses, providing a concept album telling a story that would inspire future works such as Pink Floyd’s The Wall and Genesis’s The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway. The album tells the tale of the titular protagonist as he goes “deaf, dumb, and blind” after seeing his father kill his mother’s new lover upon returning from the war. Without his senses, Tommy comes to terms with his spirituality from within and eventually becomes a messiah-like figure to the rest of the world when he finally regains his hearing, speech, and sight. The album ends with Tommy’s followers rejecting him and rebelling against him, leaving Tommy (and the listener) unsure of what to make of everything that’s happened.

At many points in the album, individual songs are strengthened by the story of the album, especially when the instrumentation works in tandem with the concept. “Cousin Kevin” is an early highlight, depicting the senseless Tommy left home alone with his cousin to be tormented. The instrumentation is as cold and indifferent as John Entwistle’s vocals, sadistically toying with the idea of “Maybe a cigarette burn on your arm/Would change your expression to one of alarm." There are many instances where the music is directly at odds with the lyrical content with great effect, such as the mocking “HA HA HA HA” in the background of “Christmas” as Tommy’s father contemplates his son’s fate in the afterlife or the goofy chorus of “Fiddle About” as Uncle Ernie plans to molest the boy. This dissonance between the music and the lyrical content works to increase the discomfort one feels when considering Tommy’s loss of innocence throughout these events.

Lyrical themes such as religion, bullying, and molestation have cropped up in this review, but where Tommy ultimately falls is its inability to tie these themes together to say anything of note or to demand any answers from the listener. Ambiguity plagues the album from the onset, with the lyrics of “1921” failing to even hint that it was a murder that set off Tommy’s disabilities. We don’t learn much of what Tommy discovered in his inward meditations in “Amazing Journey” outside of a general focus on simplicity. What exactly it is that he’s trying to teach his followers is unclear and thus fails to give the listener anything to contemplate, and as the album ends with a repeated sequence of lines referring to a mysterious “you,” we’re completely removed from the story as Townshend just pays his respects to his spiritual mentor Meher Baba. This isn’t some Socratic dialogue where thought-provoking statements lead to aporia, or a state of confusion; this is a bloated concept that fails to have anything to say to or ask of the listener, neither up to nor including its conclusion.

It’s a shame that despite its massive influence on future rock records, Tommy fails to actualize what the rock opera is meant to do. Despite the growth the album demonstrates The Who had undergone since their debut, they were still very much a band in musical puberty, exploring new ideas but not fully up to the task of understanding what they were doing. It’s telling that for the next album Townshend would drop concepts altogether for the highlight of their career, and it wouldn’t be until 1973 that they would return to the format with the much more successful Quadrophenia.


user ratings (1356)
4.1
excellent
other reviews of this album
EverythingEvil2113 (5)
The Who give birth to the "Rock Opera"....

DesolationRow (3)
...

EVedder27 (3.5)
A significant, yet flawed effort that would serve as a model for rock operas...

Drbebop (3)
Come on the (not so) amazing journey...



Comments:Add a Comment 
elcrawfodor
March 19th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Dammit, the formatting messed up when I copied and pasted it, I'll edit that now.



Despite those issues, constructive criticism is welcome! Been a long time since I wrote anything so I wanted to throw my hat into the ring again.

Tunaboy45
March 19th 2015


18429 Comments


This is a great review, have a pos.

elcrawfodor
March 19th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Alright, fixed the formatting issues. Also didn't carry over my italics for album names, I'll fix those up later tonight.

Thanks Tuna! I first heard this several years ago at like 15 and was completely enamored with it, thinking it was so cool that an album was fully dedicating itself to expressing an idea, but whenever I tried to explain it to anyone I realized I couldn't. I chalked it up to just me not understanding it back then, but as time has gone on and I've revisited the album I've realized it was because there just wasn't much to extrapolate from it.

WatchItExplode
March 19th 2015


10460 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Good points made here. Smash the Mirror will always be my favorite here, but there is a lot of great stuff.

elcrawfodor
March 19th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Musically the album is great, lots of fun little tunes, and with lots of albums I'm willing to forgo lyrical issues, but when the album is designed around a concept and a general message I felt like I had to give it more scrutiny.

What are other people's thoughts about the album's concept? Would love to spark a discussion about that.

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
March 20th 2015


22500 Comments


This was a great read Michael. It flowed really well and was extremely informative. Kudos to you.

Since I fell into the trap in my early reviewing days, my major nitpick with the review itself would be length. BUT considering the subject matter, I can see why this particular album would require that.

The only thing I might add is that the intro paragraph could freakily suggest that you maybe explain too much in your review. I'm torn on it myself, but it does kind of come off more as a - dare I say it - discussion, than review. I'd be careful about that. The lines can be blurred - especially on concept albums like this - but always keep in mind that you are writing a review. Be as succinct as possible and always look to edit (eg: combining 2 sentences into 1).

facupm
March 20th 2015


11857 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

nice read, agreed with some points you made, pos'd

Mongi123
March 20th 2015


22035 Comments


Dude great job! Very insightful read and you write very well. Just one thing I spotted though: You use the word "ambiguity" six times in the review, 5 of which are in the first paragraph. I suggest using a thesaurus for a situation like this cause it makes it less tedious on the reader when you use your words dynamically. Other than that, fantastic job. Pos.

elcrawfodor
March 20th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

@DaveyBoy I see what you're saying, but I feel like the intro was written with the end goal in mind of what the thesis and driving force behind the review was, mainly the way that the ambiguity in the concept fails to deliver the message that Townshend wanted to deliver. To me, how an album expresses its ideas falls under what a review should be able to criticize.

@Mongi Yeah I thought about that, maybe it was out of laziness but I justified it with the thought that "Oh ambiguity is the general theme I'm trying to cover here, of course I can use it multiple times!" Looking back, I did use it three times in one sentence; I'll try and edit that now. Thanks!

cara123
March 20th 2015


1 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Dude this is a great review! I love the emphasis on ambiguity. You are like God..

MrSirLordGentleman
March 20th 2015


15343 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Great review, pos'd. Album's overrated

elcrawfodor
March 20th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

@Cara thank you for that unexpected compliment haha



@MSLG Appreciate it!

KILL
March 20th 2015


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

you prick!

elcrawfodor
March 20th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

KILL while doing some research on this album I noticed you had it 5'd yesterday so something's changed for you too

KILL
March 20th 2015


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

yea it wasnt a real one i was jammin hard and someone told me to 5 it and i said ok cos i am a nice person

elcrawfodor
March 20th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"cos I am a nice person"

"you prick!"

K

KILL
March 20th 2015


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

a good review tho it seems you cant handle the pedo tunes maybe you were diddled in your youth so i can understand but whats unforgivable is that you didnt even mention one of the best rock songs ever recorded pinball fuckin wizard

Tunaboy45
March 20th 2015


18429 Comments


He was diddled by a wizard, he doesn't like to talk to about it.

Tunaboy45
March 20th 2015


18429 Comments


There's a reason he hasn't rated any Electric Wizard.

elcrawfodor
March 20th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Thank you guys for going all Freud on my ass haha

Yes Tuna there is a reason, that reason being I started Dopethrone but never got to finish it :/



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy