Bon Iver
22, A Million


4.0
excellent

Review

by Jordan M. EMERITUS
October 1st, 2016 | 93 replies


Release Date: 2016 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Don’t believe the hype.

You’re probably going to read a lot of hastily written material in the next few days that portrays 22, a Million as something profound and unordinary for Justin Vernon. Certainly, cursory listens hint at Bon Iver having attempted to mangle and repurpose folk and soft rock tropes (“10 d E A T h b R E a s T ⚄ ⚄” most apparent). However, it's difficult to argue that case when, in the space of approximately 35-minutes, the minor distortion of form that is present on the album barely registers. It's there, somewhere, but then it's always been there to some extent ("Flume", "Woods", "Perth"). True, it’s a little more unseemly than Bon Iver, Bon Iver, and the presence of autotune and drum machines are ever so slightly more pronounced than on prior outings. But what is under that façade is pastoral, textural, and sparing folk rock; without question, it's a Bon Iver album.

Of course, there's nothing wrong with it being a Bon Iver album. Justin Vernon's always had a knack for emotional impact, and what little recorded material he has released under the moniker is consistently well-written if not well executed. If comparisons must be drawn, consider it a product of Vernon's fondness for Francis and the Lights, and not a curiosity borne of Yeezus; alienation, but nothing too difficult. These songs are, compared to prior Bon Iver albums, busier, but they're no denser nor more grandly expressed than before. Nor are they particularly challenging or aggressive; after the admittedly impressive lead in of "22" / "10", the record settles with familiarity on "715 - CR∑∑KS", a familiar monologue about heartbreak processed through vocal modulation (similarities to "Fall Creek Boys Choir" and "Woods" most notable). Of course, it's pretty, and similar moments of rawness, as in "___45___", are as musically compelling as Vernon has ever been. When Vernon does try new things, it's wonderful; tracks like "21 M◊◊N WATER" and "8 (circle)" articulate an electronic ambiance that is, admittedly, new territory for Bon Iver. Despite reservations, there's tremendous satisfaction in poignancy sounding so consistent, brief, and roundly formed. Still, it's hard to make much of 22, a Million when it's obviously just a linear continuation of Vernon's recent work. It's nothing to complain about, per se, but anybody expecting anything other than just another Bon Iver album will be disappointed. Again, that's not a point of contention, rather an assurance that, even if this is Vernon exercising his creative faculties, it retains a satisfying sense of sameness.

There are obvious conclusions to draw from this, namely that you know what to expect. Vernon’s vocals haven’t altered much, still an impressionistic falsetto. His musical accompaniment is still scant, occasionally punctuated by horns and other details. There’s pianos, there’s acoustic guitars, and there’s more than a hint of despair when Vernon delivers some acerbic line, like, ‘fuck the fashion of it, dear.’ Most importantly, though, these are things he already did on For Emma, Forever Ago and Bon Iver, Bon Iver. There's little shock that he's added a little bit of saxophone here and a hint of autotune there; after all, Vernon is exceptional when it comes to composition, and he understands the dynamics of performance well. There's something comforting in the familiarity of 22, a Million's embrace. Personally, I’m not complaining.



Recent reviews by this author
Sheck Wes MudboyTravis Scott Astroworld
Denzel Curry TA13OOPusha T DAYTONA
Post Malone beerbongs and bentleysJ. Cole K.O.D.
user ratings (1132)
3.7
great
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Frippertronics
Emeritus
October 1st 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

"Don’t believe the hype."



way ahead of you

NordicMindset
October 1st 2016


25137 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[/i]Bon Iver, Bon Iver[/i]

Frippertronics
Emeritus
October 1st 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

nice soundoff btw

Rowan5215
Staff Reviewer
October 1st 2016


47618 Comments

Album Rating: 4.8

this is more of a blurb about how it's not that different to his others than an actual review but mindpos

Gyromania
October 1st 2016


37070 Comments


I was ready to dehype the hell out of this but it rules. 33 God is otherworldly. Good review as per. Brevity ftw

theBoneyKing
October 1st 2016


24422 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"nice soundoff btw" [2]



Not that this is poorly written or anything, it's just not a review.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
October 1st 2016


70240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

better hastily written material portraying this album as profound and unordinary than a hastily written 75 word review posted the day of the albums release that literally says fucking absolutely nothing of value or insight whatsoever and reads more as a bloated (and utterly unevocative) soundoff from someone thats supposed to be a contrib tbh

Lord(e)Po)))ts
October 1st 2016


70240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

this is legitimately one of the worst reviews on the entire site and im including trebors empire empire review in that

Lord(e)Po)))ts
October 1st 2016


70240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

yeah sick fucking tumblr blurb you fucking clunge

Lord(e)Po)))ts
October 1st 2016


70240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

like how did you even fucking click submit on this you absolute moron

iloveyouall
October 1st 2016


6312 Comments


sorry pots, but this ain't even close to being as bad as a ben kettle or robert low

iloveyouall
October 1st 2016


6312 Comments


and if you actually think so, imma have to draw some hasty conclusions about your reading ability
you wouldn't want that, would you?

Lord(e)Po)))ts
October 1st 2016


70240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

well way to not be a cunt about it arcade you fuck

Pon
Emeritus
October 1st 2016


5992 Comments


I mean yeah for someone who's unfamiliar with Bon Iver this could've been a lot more descriptive but the review isn't bad by any means.

iloveyouall
October 1st 2016


6312 Comments


fuck anyone that has a fuckin history paragraph at the beginning of all their reviews fr

Lord(e)Po)))ts
October 1st 2016


70240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

no its definitely a bad review considering its not a review at all

ABond
October 1st 2016


336 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Umm... this is a strange review o_O, if you could call it that at all.

iloveyouall
October 1st 2016


6312 Comments


sorry pots, drawing some pretty hasty conclusions rn and i bet you wouldn't like any of them

Lord(e)Po)))ts
October 1st 2016


70240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

first paragraph reads like this is going to go somewhere insightful and awesome (which i would legitimately like to read considering you are right, we are going to get a plethora of reviews being like "derp bon iver does not bon iver" very shortly, but then instead its like "but anyways yeah its a bon iver album the end"

Lord(e)Po)))ts
October 1st 2016


70240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

sach why the fuck do you keep addressing me at all tbh its almost like you think i give a fuck about your thoughts



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy