Sum 41
Chuck


3.5
great

Review

by punkbass0327 USER (2 Reviews)
September 25th, 2006 | 20 replies


Release Date: 2004 | Tracklist

Review Summary: This album is certainly not your typical Sum 41 or pop-punk album. Despite taking on a heavier sound the band really shines through on here and show what they are capable of.

Before releasing the third LP, Chuck, Sum 41 was widely regarded as your basic, bread and butter pop-punk band. Some loved this band for their fun songs and the simplicity that the songs were all about. Others hated them for that very reason. However, once Chuck was released the band seemed as if it completely changed its sound. No longer were the lyrics the lyrics all about fun and the music was much darker/heavier than before. Whether the new idea was a good idea was widely debated between music fans. There were Sum 41 fans you lost interest in the band, while other music enthusiasts (mainly metal fans) got into this band for the first time.

So why the sudden switch from typical pop-punk to metal? Well, Sum 41 has always regarded, even from their earliest days, that bands such as Iron Maiden and Metallica are their among their biggest influences and their favorite bands. Maybe in Chuck they thought they should pay homage to their idols and take their shot at a new direction. There could be another reason, however. Before Chuck was released the band took a trip to Congo to make a documentary on the civil war and the hardships that were taking place in the country. While they were there they saw and experienced things that changed their lives and made them open their eyes to the world around them. There was one point where the hotel that Sum 41 was staying in was being bombed, and the band said that they didn’t know if they were going to make it out alive. What happened in Congo made them angry, and that anger came out in the music.

Despite the different direction that Sum 41 has taken, there are still traces of the old, more poppy Sum 41. The Intro of the album does a great job of leading into No Reason, which is one of the stronger songs on the album and has the most punk feel to it. The song explodes with a very energetic intro and has a more old-school Sum 41 chorus to it. Pieces was the strongest single off of the album, as it combines beautifully written lyrics with softer instrumental parts. A few other notable songs off of this album are the metal influenced The Bitter End, We’re All to Blame, 88, Angels With Dirty Faces and Open Your Eyes. The ballads Slipping Away and [b] Some Say[b] are also solid numbers.
The instrumentals on Chuck are the strongest Sum 41 has ever shown in their career. Unlike their previous records, songs aren’t simply made up of three chords. The metal sound of the album really brings out solid instrumentals, especially in the guitar work. Derek shows he can shred when he wants to and write riffs that takes strong technical ability.

When it comes down to it, the album is a good solid piece of music. Sure, it’s not your typical pop-punk Sum 41 that so many people love, but the music on this CD bring out Sum 41’s real technical ability and their capability of writing solid metal songs and nice ballads. If you’re willing to try this out and aren’t afraid of something new from a band that is usually distinctively pop-punk, then you won’t be disappointed. If you’re looking for a fun pop-punk album, this probably isn’t for you and you are better off checking out the bands first LP, All Killer No Filler.


user ratings (1601)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
Acey (4)
Sum 41 can be a fun loving pop-punk band until you hear this CD. It is a side that some have never ...

Xav (4)
A legislative listen still relevant...

Fox83 (4)
...

stke22 (3.5)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
The Door Mouse
September 26th 2006


2092 Comments


it was good. sum is probably my favorite pop punk band. i havent heard much from them but wat i hear, i like. anyways about the review. you could have touched up a little bit more on the punkier side. i guess out of kindness i will pos it cuz it wuz ur first review

tom79
September 26th 2006


3938 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Good review, but 'All Killer No Filler' was the bands second LP. 'Half Hour of Power' was their first.

The Door Mouse
September 26th 2006


2092 Comments


im gonna get mobbed for this but wat is a LP? live performance? w/e. i bet this one will be better than acey's

tom79
September 26th 2006


3938 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

LP is a full length album...

CanonInD
September 26th 2006


359 Comments


pretty good job punkbass

The Door Mouse
September 26th 2006


2092 Comments


[quote=tom79]LP is a full length album...[/quote]

thxThis Message Edited On 09.25.06

f_u_c_t
September 26th 2006


1406 Comments


some true competition for Acey, did he finish his already or not?

Violents
September 26th 2006


4 Comments


88's solo is a DIRECT rip of "One" by Metallica.
Not to mention "The Bitter End" is just "Battery" by Metallica with bad vocals.
Go download the two and tell me I'm wrong.

Bron-Yr-Aur
September 26th 2006


4405 Comments


Punkbass, this is a good review. So uh... yeah. Anal sex.

NortherlyNanook
September 26th 2006


1286 Comments


[quote="Zepdude7"]i bet this one will be better than acey's[/quote]
You REALLY aren't helping Acey by saying that his review (which you haven't read) is probably worse...

As for this review, it was nice and to the point.

Acey
September 26th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

good review, for a first one, i still plan on doing it as well, and to the guy above me, i havent started because as soon as i did that journal i had to go to a banquet for work. and i just got home six hours laterThis Message Edited On 09.26.06

MyRamona
September 26th 2006


1098 Comments


Lp = long play, usually associated with vinyl. Good review, I enjoy the fact that it gets straight to the point and describes the overall sound.

711
September 26th 2006


1340 Comments


Great review. Pretty much got right to the point. Excellent for a first.
I used to like Sum 41, but I got tired of their music really quickly. It just doesnt appeal to me much anymore.

Acey
September 26th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yeah, good review, i am working on mine throughout the course of the day.

Two-Headed Boy
September 26th 2006


4527 Comments


A pleasantly suprising review. Nice work. :thumb:

iarescientists
September 26th 2006


5865 Comments


You surprised me Punkbass. That was really a high quality review. Nice job.

Waterloo_Sunset
September 26th 2006


452 Comments


that Congo stuff looks like clutching at quite a few straws as to why they would change their direction!

The Door Mouse
September 26th 2006


2092 Comments


[quote=some guy who accused me]You REALLY aren't helping Acey by saying that his review (which you haven't read) is probably worse...[/quote]

i actually did read this very thurouly and im not dissing acey im just saying that this is a hard review to beat



Acey
September 26th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i'm submitting mine right now, sorry for the wait

NortherlyNanook
September 26th 2006


1286 Comments


[quote="Zepdude7"]i actually did read this very thurouly and im not dissing acey im just saying that this is a hard review to beat[/quote]
I get what you're saying then. Your word choice in it just sounded... negative.

[quote="happyisgooda"]very good review. check out my jimi hendrix are you experienced review rite here







http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?reviewid=9314[/quote]
For God's sake, how many reviews are you going to do this in?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy