Album Rating: 4.5
And Pit
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
i like sum underoath
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Me too
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I agree with Emim. TOCS was sugary fluff to keep the kiddies entertained. They graduated to the big leagues with this album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Maybe that's true but I don't think Underoath was taking the popular route with this album. They actually went in a different direction than what typically makes a band popular. The irony is, they became popular for it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
tocs wasn't that big
|
| |
It was huge
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I mean to the general public
|
| |
Didn't it hit high in the billboard charts?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It sold 500,000 copies
That is pretty big for it's genre actually
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
They played Writing On The Walls like 50 times a day on Fuse
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
TOCS is still nowhere near as good as this.
And I would say this has much more memorable songs, as well.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"A surprising and massive accomplishment for a band who was previously trivial and unmemorable."
Amen. Totally deserving of its classic status, and you backed it up well, so have a pos. I cannot
for the life of me get into their other albums, and it makes my constant fawning over this album just
that much more difficult to justify as a result, but this is an accomplishment in the metalcore scene.
Also, They're Only Chasing Safety sucks ass, sorry guys =/
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I still think LitSoS is better or at least as good as this.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
LitSoS is a close second to this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This is easily their best. Review is average.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
So harsh, David :P
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
review seems good enough. I slightly prefer LITSOS personally. not a TOCS fan though at all, for the reasons you stated. pos.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
its a rehash and nowhere near as good
sequel =/= rehash
and
rehash =/= bad
|
| |
I'm the only person I know that liked the changing of times..
|
| |
|
|
