Album Rating: 2.0

Anyone else find it sort of amusing how the people who claim to hate this album and think it's the worst piece of shit ever created spend about 10x as much time commenting on this album than the people that actually enjoy it?

Album Rating: 3.0

xfearbefore, I noticed the same thing but thought it'd be a waste of time to say anything about it, given that no real discussion of the album takes place on these boards; just mob mentality record bashing and self-congratulory attempts at witty insults. Thanks for saying that.

its possible to enjoy it?

Album Rating: 1.0

@ xbefore



Are you sure that isn't because almost NOBODY even enjoys this record? Those who do fall for the whole avant-garde pretense have probably never heard Angel Dust by Faith No More.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Lol, how is this anything like Angel Dust? And how do you come up with that album as your example when trying to point out something "avant-garde" and make some kind of point?



Just lol.

Album Rating: 1.0

Lol. Judging from the rating I'm assuming that it was a troll comment so it's safe to take you with a grain of salt here. :D



Anyway, just used Angel Dust as an example of an experimental record with avant-garde elements that manages to succeed on its own grounds. Lulu, in comparison, claims to be avant-garde but has nothing remotely experimental or anything that pushes the envelope.



Again, safe to assume that was a troll comment. Either that or you're one of these fanboys that thinkp St. Anger was awesome (which would explain the rating). :p

what are you talking about, st anger is awsum!!1!!