The Haunted rEVOLVEr
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Storm In A Teacup
February 3rd 2006


45835 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Wow, this has gotten a lot more attention than I would have ever thought. Thanks for the feedback all. I expected this to be better than I found it to be, but sometimes you are just dissapointed.

Dethtrasher
February 3rd 2006


2211 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I haven't heard these guys but they are considered to be one of the nīmost successful thrash bands yet according to the facts I have read.

And after reading all the comments yet I would say that this is a mix of thrash and death, like Arch Enemy.

Shadows
Moderator
February 3rd 2006


2530 Comments


It's not thrash. Very far from it.

Dethtrasher
February 4th 2006


2211 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I didn't say that this is thrash, I said that this may be a mix of thrash and death.

But yes, the band was created by former members from death-metal bands. The only metal-genre that is the most dominating genre in Sweden yet.

Storm In A Teacup
February 6th 2006


45835 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

It shows thrash elements somewhat, but truly isn't thrash.

blackmage2020
March 27th 2006


21 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It's scandanavian metal, and that's all there is to it. I thought it was a great album, really made me wanna go smash some skulls.

Dethtrasher
March 31st 2006


2211 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

If I say like this: It's extreme thrash, it is not death-metal that's for sure.

The band members has played death-metal in their past.This Message Edited On 03.31.06

Bron-Yr-Aur
April 11th 2006


4405 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Meh.This Message Edited On 08.13.06

evilbat
April 24th 2006


4 Comments


the haunted are haunted that they will never emerge from the shadow of at the gates.....but still good music to listen to

Bron-Yr-Aur
August 13th 2006


4405 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Yes, Storm and I both hate the Haunted equally. I wrote a Haunted Made Me Do it review that bashes them equally. :h5:

francesfarmer
August 13th 2006


1477 Comments


Copycat.

Bron-Yr-Aur
August 13th 2006


4405 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

What mean you by that?

Arrakakaka
August 13th 2006


685 Comments


Metalcore = Botch, All Else Failed, Converge, Burnt By The Sun, etc.

Bron-Yr-Aur
August 13th 2006


4405 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

bron doesnt looooove meeeeee


That won't work.

MisterPilgrim
August 14th 2006


233 Comments


No comprmise is cool though.

/OMFG not a double-post

Dethtrasher
December 27th 2006


2211 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I got this album (finally) and I actually enjoyed it, and there is no way in hell that I'm gonna accept that this band is ''considered'' to be a ''Metalcore'' band. It sickens me, nothing offensive though.

steveosk8s
July 22nd 2007


135 Comments


oh come on, it isnt that bad. and it is NOT metalcore. not by a long shot. if anythings its closer to thrash.

its not that bad, in fact it was pretty enjoyable. their lyrics are absurd though.

one comparison i never see is that their guitar work litteraly seems like a complete rip off of mastodon. their vocal stylings are similar as well.

beans
December 27th 2007


2328 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

ok so alot of debate about what genre this band is, when i voted for them, sputnik placed them under the thrash catagory, nuff said

Unhaven
October 5th 2009


2 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I got the album and i think it was quite good. It had some songs worth listening to. I like abysmal for example

bodiesinflight57
March 21st 2010


870 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I actually quite like this album.

It's not original or amazing in any way but it's a solid metal album.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy