Album Rating: 2.0
[quote=jokesor]
And yet because he's a performer to more than a Christian audience he should have to censor his beliefs to be accepted? That's ****ing unfair.[/quote]
What the hell are you talking about? No one has said anything like this.
[quote=chan]
well, there is a difference. christian artists normally sing about their faith in god. they're singing about a religion, and that has a much deeper meaning than what secular bands usually write about. so it's understandable that a christian would like christian music more because it's talking about their complete lifestyle and beliefs.[/quote]
You have no proof it's a deeper meaning. Some people think love is strongest of all human thought/emotions and consider love songs to have the deepest meanings.
Others think the deepest meaning is about social justice and leftist politics, others consider that childish and silly.
If christian can like something more on the basis that they relate to the lyrics I should be able to like something less because I don't relate to the lyrics.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
You yourself said that he wouldn't be accepted by a secular audience,
[quote=lunch]The bit about the religious lyrics not putting off non believers is pretty silly.[/quote]
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
lunch is a pretty intelligent dude from my experience on here, minus any review that has to do with this band. but hes better than snackary
iarescientists is legit
but most importantly chan you are really gay for saying this
but you'll notice that people actually like me as opposed to you, who everybody hates This Message Edited On 10.29.08
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Alright, I'm done then I guessThis Message Edited On 10.29.08
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Good God does this have to happen every day?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
it's sort of obvious that christians generally feel more strongly about their beliefs than other groups
but okay, i think everyone's had enough of this so yeah
woah there what? Are you honestly claiming that christians care more about their beliefs than muslims or the extreme left and right. Haha wow.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Not what you said originally at all and you're still avoiding to lefties and the right wingers (we have that one Prussian Blue review)
|
| |
Good God does this have to happen every day?
I'm just glad they're not arguing about something stupid/off topic. And glad SnackaryBinx hasn't popped up and said something like "you fail lunch, you should not continue using this site."
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I can't stop listening to Brother, Sister right now so I'm definitely listening to this very soon.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
you fail lunch, you should not continue using this site.
i was pushed to do it i say!This Message Edited On 10.29.08
|
| |
^fail.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
no u
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
That's what I was trying to say in the review, how the meanings are so universal and stuff, but maybe I didn't really hit upon that as much as I should've.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
don't blame yourself bro, your wrote a fine review
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
lunchforthesky is so silly i wouldn't be surprised to learn his real name is billy or willy or philly or something else that rhymes with silly
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
now I'm stuck, I dunno whether this or [A→B] Life is better lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I like A-->B Life better than this by just a little bit...but Brother, Sister trumps them both tbh...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yea, too bad you don't love it enough to review it john eh?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
rofl snackary you got em
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
[A→B] Life is definitely more quotable, I sing Gentlemen all the time.
But I like this album's flow better, and it still has great lyrics, especially stuff like Torches and J. 1979
and yeah marksellsus, Brother, Sister is still better than this, even if I would rate all three 5/5.This Message Edited On 10.29.08
|
| |
|
|
