Lou Reed and Metallica Lulu
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
JamieTwort
October 21st 2011


26988 Comments


Great review dude. Album is atrocious.

omnipanzer
October 21st 2011


21827 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"You need to stop reading Rolling Stone"





Haha, no



It was two independent reviews.

BigHans
October 21st 2011


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

"Wherever I go, they're still with me," Reed says with gravelly delight. "This whole thing has been the way it should be, in my mind." It's not over. Reed and Metallica are talking about promoting Lulu with some live shows. And Lulu has already had an effect on the writing for Metallica's next album. Instead of starting with riffs, "James is talking about bringing lyrics in first," Ulrich says. "What happens if the music is inspired by that?"



OH DEAR GOD

omnipanzer
October 21st 2011


21827 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Hahahahahaa

AngelofDeath
Emeritus
October 21st 2011


16306 Comments


lmao

Great review, especially the summary. More like Poolu.

MO
October 21st 2011


24039 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

"And Lulu has already had an effect on the writing for Metallica's next album."



WOW for real?

Gyromania
October 21st 2011


37170 Comments


Great review, man.

BigHans
October 21st 2011


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

THanks guys.





Maybe the new album will be called THE TABLET

AngelofDeath
Emeritus
October 21st 2011


16306 Comments


Threeloaded: I Am the Tablet Edition

Kubrick
October 21st 2011


793 Comments


I know you're probably going to discount what I'm about to say based on all of the praise you've gotten in the last few pages, but this is not a good review dude. Please understand that I'm not trying to bash you. I really just think you deserve some criticism for this because of all the positive comments you are getting when, to me, it is not warranted.

You said you wrote this up very quickly and it definitely shows. I mean come on, your ENTIRE first paragraph is literally just a slew of forced comedy and pop-culture references. You expended nearly 300 words reiterating the the exact same point, and then even drew direct attention to this redundancy by insinuating at the end that no one should be surprised by this. If that's true, then why did I just read 300 words devoted to insistently expressing how bad this is?

What's much worse than this though is the fact that you never even justify the point that you repeatedly hit us over the head with so many times. There is literally no analysis of this album or why it is as bad as you claim. The entire rest of the review is devoted to the history of the artists. Hell, you talked more about St. Anger that you did about this album.

I know you're going to say that everyone already knows this is terrible so they real redundancy would be repeating the exact same things that everyone else has already said. That's a great point, but it doesn't justify writing this and submitting it as an album review. It quite simply is not a review of the album and comes off as quite childish honestly.

Sorry I'm being so harsh, but I just strongly feel that this is a poor excuse for an album review. It's more of a blog than anything else and shouldn't appear under this album as a legitimate review.

BigHans
October 21st 2011


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Its ok Kubrick, I can take it.

fr33convict
October 21st 2011


11723 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I liked this review initially but Kubrick has opened my eyes to how shitty you are Hans. Neg. Then pos because I love you.

Kubrick
October 21st 2011


793 Comments


I'm glad you didn't take that offensively, I really am. :D

I'm really not trying to be mean for the sake of it, I promise. I know you're perfectly capable of writing a good review for this album. I think personally criticism like this is never bad though.. you just gotta realize that there's people who will read this review looking for an analysis of the album and they will react the same way that I did. Yeah, a lot of people are reading for laughs and to hear someone bash this to pieces. But you could've accomplished that and still reviewed the album too.. which I really don't think you did.

BigHans
October 21st 2011


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Yeah I wasnt really going to waste my time talking about different songs and stuff because they are all so incredibly awful. Alot of times I do stuff like this to entertain myself, if anyone likes it, all the better. Of course I could do a standard style review but this will end up with like 10 reviews and that would just be boring. In any event, at least you had the balls to say why you negged, so I dont have a problem with it.

Scoot
October 21st 2011


22227 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

nice review hans

BigHans
October 21st 2011


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

m/ Scoot

JWT155
October 21st 2011


14959 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

m/

BigHans
October 21st 2011


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

the extra point is for the lulz it brings JWT.

bloozclooz
October 21st 2011


1770 Comments


wait wtf is this? why are there so many reviews for this?

what is going on

JWT155
October 21st 2011


14959 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

That it does bring.





Does anyone else want a William Shatner public reading of some of these lyrics?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy