Album Rating: 4.0

Wow, so fucking good....



I cant decide between this and Two Hunters though =/ Im leaning towards this

because it's more consistent, but I like the overall sound on Two Hunters more.This Message Edited On 01.02.08

Album Rating: 4.0

Two Hunters is more refined and the vocals are better. Also, on this one, they seem to be having somewhat of an identity crisis in a few spots. Whenever I listen to this I think it's better, then I listen to Two Hunters and think it's better, then I change my mind...I'll just say I like them equally.

Album Rating: 4.5

This band is completely overrated IMO. When i first looked into them i was pretty optimistic because a lot of people were saying they were the most epic Black Metal band ever. After listening to this a couple times my opinion is that they are the most boring Black Metal band of all time.

Album Rating: 4.0

I haven't listened to this in a while. I was incredibly bored last time I remember listening to this though.



@ Hawks10Pec: Get Two Hunters if you haven't it's much easier to digest. It's more enjoyable than this because of that.

Album Rating: 4.5

I dont know if i'll get that because i truly dont like this band. Its USBM in general. I dont know why America cant produce good Black Metal bands. The only Black Metal bands from America that i like are Kult Ov Azazel, Judas Iscariot, Leviathan, Nachtmystium, and some Xasthur.

Album Rating: 4.0

QUOTE: I dont know if i'll get that because i truly dont like this band. Its USBM in general. I dont know why America cant produce good Black Metal bands. The only Black Metal bands from America that i like are Kult Ov Azazel, Judas Iscariot, Leviathan, Nachtmystium, and some Xasthur.



*Cough* Agalloch *Cough*

Album Rating: 5.0

i just got this album in the mail



i came

Album Rating: 4.0

Very good review of this Coke. I just got this in the mail and I will be sure to comment back when I've given it my undivided attention.

Album Rating: 3.5

This could have been so much better. There just doesn't seem to be enough content to validate the song lengths. The good parts are awesome, but every song has a slow, plodding section or a part that just goes on for too long.

I have the other CD too, so hopefully that one is better.

Two Hunters is much better.

Album Rating: 4.0

Both are pretty similar. Many like this better and many like Hunters better. I'm on the fence because both are incredible.

Tbh i found this kinda boring

Album Rating: 4.0

Listen to it again. This is a grower, more so than Two Hunters was for me at least.

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

This is better than Two Hunters to be honest. Two Hunters feels like an over-thought version of this, while this one is a lot more natural and free.

Album Rating: 4.5

Neither are that great tbh.This Message Edited On 08.26.08

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

You tend to like bad music so yeah.

Album Rating: 4.0

Stick to your sympho melo crapola, hawks. Just kidding man, but you are wrong.

they're no cradle of filth

Album Rating: 4.5

Stick to your sympho melo crapola, hawks. Just kidding man, but you are wrong.

Album Rating: 4.0

I found Two Hunters to be more focused and better structured, thus a wee bit better. They are both solid though and I can't disagree with that. This Message Edited On 08.26.08