| | | Ratings (36) |
Give your Rating |
| 4.0 excellent | Gary STAFF | January 3rd 21 |
I can echo exactly what DDD said. Too bad the great difference in the production quality between the two halves, but nothing dampens the fact: Pentagram rules. Personally I loved the Rolling Stones cover and 'Much Too Young to Know' the most. Pure rock 'n' roll / a bit doom 'n' roll, huh?
Bump |
| 4.0 excellent | Chino smoking it up! | July 29th 19 |
Its really a bummer the bad production of CD2. Those tracks would kick even more ass...disagree on
calling CD1 mainstream though. Its very well produced, and yeah more rock than doomy fuzzy, maybe
that's why the impression. Recd Tracks - Teaser; Man; Target.
Bump |
| 4.5 superb | wham49 | September 9th 15 |
I find this a great companion to the first release. It is not as consistant as the first, but has
some great tracks, especially on the second disk. The first disc plays as a failed attempt at the
mainstream with a full album, "or so it seems". They have a couple covers and things are toned
down. The second disc however, has much of the same kind of astonishing songs as the first daze,
but a little more poorly recorded
Bump |
| 4.0 excellent | SuzyC | January 4th 21 |
| 4.0 excellent | bobby72 | July 24th 20 |
| 3.5 great | Spluger | February 13th 19 |
| 4.0 excellent | Inveigh | April 5th 16 |
| 3.5 great | KILL | February 26th 16 |
| 3.0 good | Pegana | November 22nd 15 |
| 3.5 great | manosg EMERITUS | August 26th 15 |
| 4.0 excellent | vkristi | January 18th 13 |
| |
Give Your Opinion on First Daze Here Too
|
