Quartz
Stand Up and Fight


3.0
good

Review

by Mutty USER (1 Reviews)
September 27th, 2017 | 8 replies


Release Date: 1980 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Manly but... not as much as it looks like.

Quartz is a group that predated the NWOBHM; they had been active as Bandy Legs since 1974 before releasing their self-titled debut in 1977. Just like Judas Priest, Motorhead or even Black Sabbath, they actually became associated with that movement some years into their career, but unlike those prolific peers of theirs who managed to only be temporarily attached to that acronym, using it as a pivot point to reinvigorate their careers, Quartz just rode the bandwagon up to the point when the scene declined, disbanding in 1984. They made a brief reunion in 1996 and again in 2016.

Stand up and Fight, which is their most known work, was created by musicians who were around their mid-thirties when it was released in 1980, and maybe that can shed some light on why it didn't display the same amount of high-energy some younger bands offered us that same year (i.e. Maiden, Angel Witch, Tygers of Pan Tang). Vocalist Mike "Taffy" Taylor (RIP) somehow tried to spice up what turned out to be, for the most part, a mid-paced, simply structured hard rock album with some scattered bluesy undertones guitar-wise. In all honesty, this could have been released some years earlier as Quartz's overall approach probably sounded a bit safe, if not dated, even back then. What rubs me the wrong way the most is that moments here that could make the barbarian on the cover nod in approval are really scarce (e.g. the intro verse of "Stoking up the Fires of Hell" or "Revenge" and perhaps the opener). Speaking of which, the track order seems a miss. "Revenge" should have followed the title track, and I'm not sure if that song about weed sounds more out of place than the one about coke; some of the most interesting songs are buried down the middle of the tracklist and some just exist for no reason at all. On the upside, I enjoy the way this one's mixed. The guitars actually suffer a bit by a 'thinness' that was a common hurdle back then, especially when you didn't have the appropriate budget to support production, but I really appreciate that the bass and drums were given space. The most enjoyable aspect of this band is its stout rhythm section: Derek Arnold and Malcolm Cope being front spot is something that grants an organic and groove-laden feel, even to some of the weaker tracks present. It's one of those old school cases of a studio album that manages to sound live without being sloppy or overly raw.

That being said, one could probably understand why these guys didn't last and disbanded after releasing one more album three years down the road. Their works were decent enough to carry them through during that early part of the decade when NWOBHM was a thing, landing them a spot as an opening act for some more successful bands from that era; however, other than the manly cover, there are simply no truly memorable offerings here, no distinct musical direction, nothing that really stands out and could act as a foundation for a successful and lasting career. Quartz were followers, not leaders. All things considered, Stand up and Fight as a whole might sound more satisfying to fans of '70s hard rock than to strict metal enthusiasts. If you belong to the latter, you can still give this a chance, but you could save some time by sticking to the approved tracks mentioned earlier.


user ratings (17)
3.3
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
Mutty
September 27th 2017


37 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCtQS6D0JVQ

MarsKid
Emeritus
September 27th 2017


21035 Comments


Decent review. Don't have much else to add in all honesty. The main paragraph has a few errors and reads kind of jumbled at parts.

Mutty
September 27th 2017


37 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

could u point those errors out so I can edit?

MarsKid
Emeritus
September 27th 2017


21035 Comments


"Vocalist Mike "Taffy" Taylor (RIP) somehow tried to spice up what turned out to be, for the most part, a mid-paced, simply structured hard rock album with some scattered bluesy undertones guitar-wise, that, in all honesty, could have been released some years earlier: Quartz's approach probably sounded a bit safe, if not dated, even back then."

This sentence could most likely be rewritten so that it doesn't prattle on as much. Could probably be split in two so that it flows much better.

"What rubs me the wrong way the most is that moments here that could make the barbarian on the cover nod in approval are really scarce (e.g. the intro verse of "Stoking up the Fires of Hell" or "Revenge" and perhaps the opener)"

Tell me more about those moments and what makes them work instead of just rendering them a footnote. It should be easy to throw in a well-composed description so that anyone checking can get a better understanding of what's going down.

"On the upside, I enjoy the way this one's mixed. Yes, the guitars might suffer a bit by a 'thinness' that was a common hurdle back then, especially when you didn't have the appropriate budget to support production, but I really appreciate that the bass and drums were given space. The most enjoyable aspect of this band is its stout rhythm section: Derek Arnold and Malcolm Cope being front spot is something that grants an organic and groove-laden feel, even to some of the weaker tracks present. It's one of those old school cases of a studio album that manages to sound live without being sloppy or overly raw."

Provide more info here and it would honestly function better as its own paragraph. While inside one central paragraph, it feels like you're getting a huge wall of information line after the other and it doesn't all fit together.

Hope this helps





Mutty
September 27th 2017


37 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I see... perhaps ill try to edit this tomorrow and tidy things up or at least consider your points for my future reviews. thx for the help

MarsKid
Emeritus
September 27th 2017


21035 Comments


Anytime my man

Itsonlyme
November 25th 2017


127 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Decent album clothed in a cover that seems to promise more than the band could accomplish. But still nice hard rockin' album.

Drifter
June 24th 2021


21034 Comments


slaps



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy