The Devil Wears Prada
Plagues


2.5
average

Review

by Hysterical USER (2 Reviews)
August 20th, 2007 | 250 replies


Release Date: 2007 | Tracklist

Review Summary: The album is a more mature version of the last. It is much more enjoyable to listen too. If you liked the last album...you will love this one. Even though the style of play didn't change, the band has improved as a whole.

We all know that a band’s sophomore release either makes or breaks a band. And I am here to tell you that Plagues will not break The Devil Wears Prada. The album appears to be a more mature version of the previous release. The style has not changed much, but everything else has improved significantly. The songs have a stronger structure, the break downs are heavier, the choruses are catchier, and the songs as a whole seem much more powerful.

This record sounds very similar to Dear Love: A Beautiful Discord…only better. As the last album easily lost my attention, I find myself unable to stop listening to this one. There is rarely a boring moment in this album. This is largely due to the minor improvements the band made as a whole. They don't really show individual improvements, but improvements as a whole. They music falls together much better.

The structure of plagues appears to be a lot stronger. I would have to say this is due to the perfection found in the transitions. The transitions throughout each song keep them flowing. Don’t think it ends there either. The transitions from song to song are just as impressive. The first time I listened to the album...I had a hard time telling when a new song started. Don’t get me wrong, it wasn’t because the songs were repetitive. It was the fact that the songs were not repetitive and the transitions were flawless.

On top of that, the breakdowns are much heavier and catchier. As we know, most breakdowns in this genre are not very original, and by no means are TDWP’s breakdowns an exception. However, the use of an assortment of factors, specifically the synth, allows them to personalize each breakdowns to there specific style. In some cases the synth allows the breakdown to be more up-beat. While in other cases it allows the breakdowns to be more powerful. Either way the synth in this album, compared to the last, is much more effective causing the album as a whole to be simply better.

Finally, a note on the vocals in Plagues. TDWP’s vocalist has been both worshiped and ridiculed. Some love his vocals and others hate them, specifically live. I have not always been a fan of his vocals, but I must say that have improved since the past album. As the highs are virtually the same, the lows are more brutal. The clean vocals on the other hand, haven’t changed much, but they are used more frequently. At some points they sound similar to that of chiodos but not as girly. This isn’t a bad thing though, as it allows the breakdowns to appear heavier and more powerful


user ratings (1823)
3.1
good
other reviews of this album
Mikesn EMERITUS (2)
Yet another boring, rehashed metalcore album which offers little of substance to the table. Yawn....

Spec (3.5)
The album is no classic, but offers a solid list of metal-core songs....

X3ni92 (2)
Here’s an offering...of the same old formula....

mann28 (3.5)
Plagues may not be anything special in the endless world of music, but stands out from many other me...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Hysterical
August 20th 2007


161 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

This is my first review. I tryed to make it to the point and without a lot of useless information that is just there to show off my verbal skills, I willing to take any constructive criticism. Hopefully i will be able to add and correct to improve the review. On the other hand...I would like to say that i truly enjoy this album and see it in my selection for some time. I would appreciate if you guys didn't flame this review because it isn't your underground death metal. I understand they attract scene kids, but who cares...just enjoy the music.

masscows
August 20th 2007


2230 Comments


The review was too short and wasn't all that descriptive. Because I know what this band sounds like already, I can envision what this sounds like based on your description, but someone new to the band/genre will have no idea.

Talk more about the individual musicians and their performances, because their musicianship was pretty bad on their last one and you mentioned an improvement there, so an elaboration would've been good.

Just a few things. I won't neg because it wasn't a bad review, it just wasn't a very good one.

lunchforthesky
August 20th 2007


1039 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Solid first review. Personally I prefer when people write more elaborately, it's more interesting to read.



Not a fan of the music at all.

LifeInABox
August 20th 2007


3709 Comments


Doesn't this come out tommorrow?

Mikesn
Emeritus
August 20th 2007


3707 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah. There's no stream that I know of.

LifeInABox
August 20th 2007


3709 Comments


Report or no.

ToWhatEnd
August 20th 2007


3173 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'm not going to report him but to the person who wrote this I highly suggest you take this down until the release date and add a bit more detail. This is definitely an improvement over their debut though.

Shred Danson
August 20th 2007


118 Comments


Goddamn the song names are retarded. All except for number 10 anyway.

robin2220
August 20th 2007


569 Comments


Track one sounds like a spin off of Snakes On A Plane.

SpinLightTwo
August 20th 2007


1067 Comments


Number 6's title actually really pisses me off.

kalkal50
August 20th 2007


2386 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

number 4's title is completely retarded, and this album is very bad

robin2220
August 20th 2007


569 Comments


Terrible terrible band.

Confessed2005
August 20th 2007


6088 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Wow.



The song titles are worse than anything I've ever seen. Awful band, average review.This Message Edited On 08.20.07

Hysterical
August 20th 2007


161 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Pre releases have been shipped and recieved by any most whom pre-ordered it. I saw them live 2 days ago and they were selling them and i bought one. I legally purchased from the band. thanks for the imput masscows...i'll take it into mind for my next review.

Monticello
August 20th 2007


805 Comments


Wow.
The song titles are worse than anything I've ever seen. Awful band, average review.



gasmaskman
August 20th 2007


1006 Comments


Liek did u guyz no HTML rulez ?!!1 liek d00d totly

Eakflanderyof
August 20th 2007


5921 Comments


Well, I've never heard anything by this band, but they have been successful in making me hate them just with their song names.

I mean, seriosuly, does this album have a point? The album is called Plagues and the album art tries to be all dark and despairing, but then the song names are ridiculous and make no ****ing sense. This Message Edited On 08.20.07

kalkal50
August 20th 2007


2386 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

The transitions throughout each song keep them flowing.




The lack of transitions in your review stops it from flowing.

Euology650
August 20th 2007


2 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Hey great review, I had same thoughts on the album and saw these guys a couple of weeks ago. They are a great band live. Not sure why song names matter, TDWP has great lyrics and all the songs are christian based.

kalkal50
August 20th 2007


2386 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

your opinion isn't valid chumpThis Message Edited On 08.20.07



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy