Cute Is What We Aim For
Rotation


3.5
great

Review

by ilikemusicthatsucks USER (3 Reviews)
June 27th, 2008 | 107 replies


Release Date: 2008 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Pretty drastic improvement over the last effort. Lyrics are still terrible though. Also, not obscure/faux-intellectual enough for most Sputnik users' tastes.

When "Doctor" was first released on the band's Myspace, many people were shocked to learn that Shaant Hacikyan was a male. Even more shocking was the fact that Cute is What We Aim For actually have a bassist (even after that slot notoriously "rotated" over and over). But most shocking of all was that this could actually be classified as a "pop-punk" song, whereas you would have a hard time slapping even that label on their debut, Same Blood Rush with a New Touch.

The album opens with single "Practice Makes Perfect," and it's the track that most resembles their old work. Still, producer John Feldmann has given this band a bigger and less whiney sound, and it's clear even here. As mentioned above, Hacikyan voice sounds less high-pitched and feminine. And even better, the chorus is as infectious as the bands' sound should have been on their first album; for a band that labeled its self pop-rock it was hard to find anything resembling a good pop-hook on their debut. Here, the hooks never stop.

Granted, a Cute is What We Aim For song is a Cute is What We Aim For song. Their upbeat pop sound is still identifiably "Cute," and if you can't reconcile yourself with that then this won't change your mind. But every track tries a new dressing on this feel good pop-punk, some of them cliché, some of them original but all of them fun.

The straight-up rockers "Doctor" and "The Lock Down Denial" are easily the best tracks. Their ability to sound raucous is pretty surprising, and at times they almost sound threatening, especially on the closing breakdowns of "Doctor" and "Miss Sobriety." Well, you know, not Sex Pistols-threatening. Like, New Found Glory-threatening. But yeah.

"Loser," is a good, if a tad cliché', pop-punk mediation on the mentality of those people we all know who enjoy insulting others for the sake of their own insecurities. "A loser can win whenever they want to, all that they gotta, gotta do, is bring you down." Not a stroke of lyrical genius, but it is a catchy way of formulating an idiom that still delivers a valid message that might help some of the miserable snobs that nobody in the real world actually likes here on Sputnik.

Elsewhere, the band branches out. No, not kidding. "Hollywood," featuring horns and a Coldplay-esque (?!) phrasing, borders on the absurd, though it gets props for ambition. You'll also find some a cappella and synthy dance-beats. Don't ask.


The ending track, the faux-epic "Time," will no doubt be blaring out of the speakers of thousands teenagers' bedrooms after an August breakup, and for that it does its job well. The acoustic-electric buildup is impressive. But you can't help but shake the feeling that the band thinks they put together a far greater song than they actually did.

Actually, you get that feeling the whole album. True, this a drastic improvement over their last album. But this isn't "classic" material, and judging by the press releases and interviews from this band recently you'd think that they just recorded the next Nevermind.

That's impossible because the lyrics still suck. I would go into detail, but why? While the subject matter is more mature, they are still written in a childish, radio-friendly form that tend to make some people nauseous. And while some of them are fun to yell along to in the car (the chorus to "Doctor"), they're still pretty cheap.

In the end, it's refreshing to see such a drastic improvement on a sophomore effort. Every song does its job pretty well. The problem is that, plainly, the lyrics are bad. I've come to ignore that problem in this genre. But is that a good thing? Has pop-punk fully exhausted all of its lyrical potential? Those are the questions that came to my mind after listening to this. But really, that's not their problem. They just wanted to make a cool pop punk record, and on this level they succeeded.

But hey! Why the hell would you want to listen to this, anyway? Shouldn't you be listening to some of the "great" music the people here at Sputnik are hawking every week? Shouldn't you be feeding your false view of yourself as an elite music aficionado who knows better than everybody else? Go pick up some Protest the Hero or Have A Nice Life or Thrice, because seriously, this stuff is for 14 year old girls that aren't smart like Sputnik users. We all know that there is no way you actually like it. It's really because you are somehow uneducated and we, my friend, will fix that!


user ratings (198)
2.4
average
other reviews of this album
dylantheairplane (1.5)
Rotation is an album that is bland and emotionless. Not an ounce of effort is present on this sophom...



Comments:Add a Comment 
ilikemusicthatsucks
June 27th 2008


1063 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Best band everrrrrrrrrrrrrrz.

joshuatree
Emeritus
June 27th 2008


3744 Comments


i lol'd at the last paragraph

pretty bad review too, wont vote thoughThis Message Edited On 06.27.08

timbo8
June 27th 2008


633 Comments


negged, mostly for acting childish and bashing sputnik readers as elitists

Serpento
June 27th 2008


2351 Comments


needs moar crazy namedrops/comparisons to bands that aren't similar at all

slyguy
June 27th 2008


22 Comments


Ending wasn't necessary... at all. Otherwise I have no problem with your review, I quite enjoyed the last album.

Smileyface
June 27th 2008


309 Comments


Bad review.

robin
June 27th 2008


4595 Comments


this music is far too above this website.

foreverendeared
June 27th 2008


14741 Comments


i'm better than this website.

Smileyface
June 27th 2008


309 Comments


For your description of "Loser" you should die in a fire.

Go join Ouch on AbsolutepunkThis Message Edited On 06.27.08

Athom
Emeritus
June 27th 2008


17244 Comments


pop punk can be good if its done right... and this is not done right. And if you think we're all elitists obviously you've never taken a gander at Pitchfork. Now they are some uptight assholes.

Smileyface
June 27th 2008


309 Comments


You really aren't funny Ilikemusicthatsucks.

Athom
Emeritus
June 27th 2008


17244 Comments


i was just stating the obvious.

ilikemusicthatsucks
June 28th 2008


1063 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

and this is not done right.




So I assume you have actually listened to this album and aren't judging it based on the last one/the band's retarded image? Actually I assume the opposite.





Smileyface
June 28th 2008


309 Comments


Writing a shitty positive review, railing against the users of sputnik, for a band almost unanimously hated on sputnik, as well as just about anywhere else, will get you nowhere fast. This Message Edited On 06.27.08

ilikemusicthatsucks
June 28th 2008


1063 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

^I'd prefer if you didn't try to school me on Sputnik and where I "will get" on it as if I was your pupil and you are some sort of high priest in some sort of hierarchy, since you haven't been here very long. I have been here for a number of months (absent about a month due to no internet access) and have written a bunch of reviews, under this screenname and others that were banned (they all got deleted when the database crashed or whatever). And to brag, only my second review was featured (Forever the Sickest Kids.)



Basically, stfu noob.This Message Edited On 06.27.08

Athom
Emeritus
June 28th 2008


17244 Comments


actually i have heard this. I have a friend of mine that listens to a lot of the Fueled By Ramen type bands and also a lot of that electro pop stuff. And I'm one of the 3 people on this site that actually likes Underdog Alma Matter.

Serpento
June 28th 2008


2351 Comments


my second review was too, and yet I can get away with being a twat. you obviously didnt read the enclosed instruction booklet.

Smileyface
June 28th 2008


309 Comments


If you constantly rail against the site, why then do you stay?

Also, you seem to ram against people because of their liking of "obscure/faux-intellectual" music. It is all a matter of taste, and all you do is just ram against them for the same thing you get rammed at for: liking something different.

I really don't care I haven't been on that long, and I don't care your second review got featured, because that review is probably so much better than this piece of shit review.

ilikemusicthatsucks
June 28th 2008


1063 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

actually i have heard this.




Well whatevvvv fine. Like I said in the review if you just couldn't even stand a single thing about the band before, even the singles or the catchiness then you probably won't find anything to change your mind here. But I liked "The Curse of Curves" from the last one. And the tracks on here are just way fun to me. Especially "Doctor" and "Marriage to Millions."

ilikemusicthatsucks
June 28th 2008


1063 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

If you constantly rail against the site, why then do you stay?




Because I like the concept behind the site and its format, just not a lot of the users. Plus it's a good way to hone your writing skills, even though this one clearly was no attempt at good writing.





Also, you seem to ram against people because of their liking of "obscure/faux-intellectual" music. It is all a matter of taste, and all you do is just ram against them for the same thing you get rammed at for: liking something different.




Not really. I don't care if you like PTH or Have A Nice Life. I even like the latter. What I don't like at all is that anybody on this website who says they think PTH isn't any good becomes a sort of leper on this website as long as they stay. And don't even say that isn't true. I know it from experience.





I really don't care I haven't been on that long,




Then let's not tell people what they should and shouldn't do on Sputnik as if we know anything, k?



and I don't care your second review got featured, because that review is probably so much better than this piece of shit review.




Yup, it was.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy